Cargando…

125. The Clinical Impact of 16S rRNA Bacterial Sequencing in Infective Endocarditis

BACKGROUND: Cases of possible and/or culture-negative endocarditis continue to be a diagnostic challenge. Performing bacterial 16S ribosomal RNA polymerase chain reaction (rRNA PCR) sequencing on cardiac valves now allows providers to make microbiologic diagnoses that were previously unobtainable (s...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: El-Dalati, Sami, Cinti, Sandro, Owczarczyk, Anna, Riddell, Jamie, Fagan, Christopher, Chanderraj, Rishi, Fukuhara, Shinichi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6809846/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofz360.200
_version_ 1783462096984342528
author El-Dalati, Sami
Cinti, Sandro
Owczarczyk, Anna
Riddell, Jamie
Fagan, Christopher
Chanderraj, Rishi
Fukuhara, Shinichi
author_facet El-Dalati, Sami
Cinti, Sandro
Owczarczyk, Anna
Riddell, Jamie
Fagan, Christopher
Chanderraj, Rishi
Fukuhara, Shinichi
author_sort El-Dalati, Sami
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Cases of possible and/or culture-negative endocarditis continue to be a diagnostic challenge. Performing bacterial 16S ribosomal RNA polymerase chain reaction (rRNA PCR) sequencing on cardiac valves now allows providers to make microbiologic diagnoses that were previously unobtainable (sensitivity 66–80.5%). However, few publications address how the PCR results impact clinical management in endocarditis patients. METHODS: Between July 1, 2014 and December 31, 2018, the results of all 16S rRNA PCR tests collected from cardiac valves at the University of Michigan were reviewed. Samples were sent to the University of Washington for sequencing. Each chart was then reviewed by two independent ID physicians to determine whether patients’ medical plans were impacted by the PCR results. RESULTS: 41 patients were identified with associated 16S rRNA PCR testing from cardiac valves. 16 cases met Duke Criteria for definite endocarditis, 22 for possible and 3 were rejected endocarditis. Overall, 18 (43.9%) samples were positive. Of these, 10 patients had concordant positive blood cultures. In 8 patients a previously unsuspected organism was identified. Twenty-four out of 41 patients were considered to have culture-negative endocarditis with October 24 (41.7%) who had positive PCR results. Twenty-two patients were noted to have operative findings consistent with infection with 16 (72.7%) having corresponding positive PCR results. 4/41 (9.8%) patients had their management plans changed based solely on the PCR findings. In 23/41 (56.1%) cases the PCR result was never referenced by any medical provider in the electronic medical record. There were 7 (17.1%) cases where patients received 6 weeks of antibiotics despite presenting with possible culture-negative endocarditis, noninfectious operative findings and negative valve PCRs which were not reviewed. CONCLUSION: 16S rRNA PCR sequencing is a useful tool for obtaining a microbiologic diagnosis in cases of possible or culture-negative endocarditis. The test has significant potential to impact individual patient care and in a subset of cases may be used to de-escalate antibiotic therapy. However, testing delays and cumbersome resulting methods impede bacterial sequencing from reaching its full potential as a diagnostic modality. [Image: see text] DISCLOSURES: All authors: No reported disclosures.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6809846
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-68098462019-10-28 125. The Clinical Impact of 16S rRNA Bacterial Sequencing in Infective Endocarditis El-Dalati, Sami Cinti, Sandro Owczarczyk, Anna Riddell, Jamie Fagan, Christopher Chanderraj, Rishi Fukuhara, Shinichi Open Forum Infect Dis Abstracts BACKGROUND: Cases of possible and/or culture-negative endocarditis continue to be a diagnostic challenge. Performing bacterial 16S ribosomal RNA polymerase chain reaction (rRNA PCR) sequencing on cardiac valves now allows providers to make microbiologic diagnoses that were previously unobtainable (sensitivity 66–80.5%). However, few publications address how the PCR results impact clinical management in endocarditis patients. METHODS: Between July 1, 2014 and December 31, 2018, the results of all 16S rRNA PCR tests collected from cardiac valves at the University of Michigan were reviewed. Samples were sent to the University of Washington for sequencing. Each chart was then reviewed by two independent ID physicians to determine whether patients’ medical plans were impacted by the PCR results. RESULTS: 41 patients were identified with associated 16S rRNA PCR testing from cardiac valves. 16 cases met Duke Criteria for definite endocarditis, 22 for possible and 3 were rejected endocarditis. Overall, 18 (43.9%) samples were positive. Of these, 10 patients had concordant positive blood cultures. In 8 patients a previously unsuspected organism was identified. Twenty-four out of 41 patients were considered to have culture-negative endocarditis with October 24 (41.7%) who had positive PCR results. Twenty-two patients were noted to have operative findings consistent with infection with 16 (72.7%) having corresponding positive PCR results. 4/41 (9.8%) patients had their management plans changed based solely on the PCR findings. In 23/41 (56.1%) cases the PCR result was never referenced by any medical provider in the electronic medical record. There were 7 (17.1%) cases where patients received 6 weeks of antibiotics despite presenting with possible culture-negative endocarditis, noninfectious operative findings and negative valve PCRs which were not reviewed. CONCLUSION: 16S rRNA PCR sequencing is a useful tool for obtaining a microbiologic diagnosis in cases of possible or culture-negative endocarditis. The test has significant potential to impact individual patient care and in a subset of cases may be used to de-escalate antibiotic therapy. However, testing delays and cumbersome resulting methods impede bacterial sequencing from reaching its full potential as a diagnostic modality. [Image: see text] DISCLOSURES: All authors: No reported disclosures. Oxford University Press 2019-10-23 /pmc/articles/PMC6809846/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofz360.200 Text en © The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial reproduction and distribution of the work, in any medium, provided the original work is not altered or transformed in any way, and that the work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Abstracts
El-Dalati, Sami
Cinti, Sandro
Owczarczyk, Anna
Riddell, Jamie
Fagan, Christopher
Chanderraj, Rishi
Fukuhara, Shinichi
125. The Clinical Impact of 16S rRNA Bacterial Sequencing in Infective Endocarditis
title 125. The Clinical Impact of 16S rRNA Bacterial Sequencing in Infective Endocarditis
title_full 125. The Clinical Impact of 16S rRNA Bacterial Sequencing in Infective Endocarditis
title_fullStr 125. The Clinical Impact of 16S rRNA Bacterial Sequencing in Infective Endocarditis
title_full_unstemmed 125. The Clinical Impact of 16S rRNA Bacterial Sequencing in Infective Endocarditis
title_short 125. The Clinical Impact of 16S rRNA Bacterial Sequencing in Infective Endocarditis
title_sort 125. the clinical impact of 16s rrna bacterial sequencing in infective endocarditis
topic Abstracts
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6809846/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofz360.200
work_keys_str_mv AT eldalatisami 125theclinicalimpactof16srrnabacterialsequencingininfectiveendocarditis
AT cintisandro 125theclinicalimpactof16srrnabacterialsequencingininfectiveendocarditis
AT owczarczykanna 125theclinicalimpactof16srrnabacterialsequencingininfectiveendocarditis
AT riddelljamie 125theclinicalimpactof16srrnabacterialsequencingininfectiveendocarditis
AT faganchristopher 125theclinicalimpactof16srrnabacterialsequencingininfectiveendocarditis
AT chanderrajrishi 125theclinicalimpactof16srrnabacterialsequencingininfectiveendocarditis
AT fukuharashinichi 125theclinicalimpactof16srrnabacterialsequencingininfectiveendocarditis