Cargando…
2287. Real-world Use of Tedizolid Phosphate: A Case Series of Long-Term Tolerability
BACKGROUND: Tedizolid is an oxazolidinone antibiotic with broad-spectrum Gram-positive activity approved for the treatment of skin and skin structure infections with a 6-day course. Oxazolidinone antibiotics represent appealing options for prolonged antimicrobial therapy due to their available oral...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6809895/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofz360.1965 |
Sumario: | BACKGROUND: Tedizolid is an oxazolidinone antibiotic with broad-spectrum Gram-positive activity approved for the treatment of skin and skin structure infections with a 6-day course. Oxazolidinone antibiotics represent appealing options for prolonged antimicrobial therapy due to their available oral formulations with excellent bioavailability and potent in vitro activity against various multidrug-resistant Gram-positive organisms, Mycobacterium spp., and Nocardia spp. Although tedizolid and linezolid offer a similar clinical spectrum based on antimicrobial activity alone, long-term use of linezolid is often limited by serious adverse effects. Preliminary assessments have suggested better tolerability with tedizolid; however, these are limited by shorter exposure duration. The objective of this study was to evaluate the long-term safety and tolerability of tedizolid. METHODS: Retrospective cohort of adult patients receiving tedizolid for ≥ 28 days, with baseline complete blood cell (CBC) indices available, and CBC indices drawn ≥ 14 days into tedizolid course. The primary objective was to evaluate the long-term tolerability of tedizolid. RESULTS: 13 patients met inclusion criteria: median age 61 years (IQR, 51–64 years), 69% male, 85% Caucasian. The majority of patients utilized tedizolid for suppression (85%), and the median duration of tedizolid was 113 days (IQR, 71–204 days). There were no differences in CBC indices when comparing baseline to last laboratory draw throughout tedizolid exposure: platelets (baseline: 203 x 10(9)/L (IQR, 186–283 x 10(9)/L) vs. last: 196 x 10(9)/L (IQR, 161–303 x 10(9)/L; p = 0.65), hemoglobin (baseline: 9.8 g/dL (IQR, 8.8–11.1 g/dL) vs. last: 11.7 g/dL (IQR, 11.0–13.1 g/dL; p = 0.10), and white blood cells (baseline: 6.2 x 10(9)/L (IQR, 5.6–7.6 x 10(9)/L) vs. last: 6.5 x 10(9)/L (IQR, 6.3–7.3 x 10(9)/L; p = 0.45). The final laboratory draws were obtained a median of 78 days (IQR, 44–119 days) into therapy. No patients experienced peripheral neuropathy, optic neuritis/visual changes, or serotonin syndrome during treatment/suppression with tedizolid during the period evaluated. CONCLUSION: Long-term therapy with tedizolid appears to be well-tolerated. Treatment and suppression with tedizolid seems to be a safe alternative to linezolid. DISCLOSURES: All authors: No reported disclosures. |
---|