Cargando…

196. Impact of BioFire FilmArray® Blood Culture Identification on the Management of Staphylococcus aureus Bacteremia

BACKGROUND: Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia (SAB) is associated with 30-day mortality rates that are as high as 20 to 40%. In order to reduce mortality and treatment failures, SAB management should include prompt infectious diseases (ID) consult, repeat blood cultures, source control, intravenous a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nguyen, Kiet, McKamey, Lacie, Green, Sarah
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6809936/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofz360.271
_version_ 1783462122309550080
author Nguyen, Kiet
McKamey, Lacie
Green, Sarah
author_facet Nguyen, Kiet
McKamey, Lacie
Green, Sarah
author_sort Nguyen, Kiet
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia (SAB) is associated with 30-day mortality rates that are as high as 20 to 40%. In order to reduce mortality and treatment failures, SAB management should include prompt infectious diseases (ID) consult, repeat blood cultures, source control, intravenous antibiotics for the entirety of treatment, and optimal treatment duration. The objective of this study was to determine the impact of BioFire FilmArray® Blood Culture Identification (BCID) on the implementation of these standard of care measures in the management of SAB across a large health system. METHODS: This study was an IRB approved, retrospective chart review evaluating the impact of rapid diagnostics on the management of SAB before and after implementation of BCID. The composite endpoint consisted of mortality at 30 days, persistent SAB (≥7 days), and recurrence of S. aureus infection within 30 days. Patients were included if they were ≥18 years old and at least one blood culture was positive with S. aureus. The pre-BCID period was between September 1, 2016 and March 31, 2017. The post-BCID period was between April 1, 2017 and July 31, 2018. Fisher’s exact test, student’s t-test, and descriptive statistics were used in the analysis. RESULTS: A total of 200 patients met eligibility (pre-BCID, n = 102; post-BCID, n = 98). The composite endpoint was met in 34% of patients in the pre-BCID group and 29% in the post-BCID group (P = 0.45). Mortality at 30 days (17% vs. 17%, P = 1.00), persistent SAB (16% vs. 13%, P = 0.69), and rates of recurrence within 30 days (4% vs. 1%, P = 0.37) were similar between groups. ID consult increased after BCID implementation (83% vs. 92%, P = 0.001). More patients in the post-BCID received appropriate durations of antibiotics (75% vs. 86%, P = 0.04) and had decreased time, in hours, to definitive therapy (7 ± 17 vs. 1 ± 5, P ≤ 0.05). CONCLUSION: The management of SAB after implementation of BCID did not show a decrease in the primary outcome but did show an improved time to appropriate therapy. A larger study is needed to determine whether improved time to appropriate therapy translates to an improvement in patient outcomes. [Image: see text] DISCLOSURES: All authors: No reported disclosures.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6809936
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-68099362019-10-28 196. Impact of BioFire FilmArray® Blood Culture Identification on the Management of Staphylococcus aureus Bacteremia Nguyen, Kiet McKamey, Lacie Green, Sarah Open Forum Infect Dis Abstracts BACKGROUND: Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia (SAB) is associated with 30-day mortality rates that are as high as 20 to 40%. In order to reduce mortality and treatment failures, SAB management should include prompt infectious diseases (ID) consult, repeat blood cultures, source control, intravenous antibiotics for the entirety of treatment, and optimal treatment duration. The objective of this study was to determine the impact of BioFire FilmArray® Blood Culture Identification (BCID) on the implementation of these standard of care measures in the management of SAB across a large health system. METHODS: This study was an IRB approved, retrospective chart review evaluating the impact of rapid diagnostics on the management of SAB before and after implementation of BCID. The composite endpoint consisted of mortality at 30 days, persistent SAB (≥7 days), and recurrence of S. aureus infection within 30 days. Patients were included if they were ≥18 years old and at least one blood culture was positive with S. aureus. The pre-BCID period was between September 1, 2016 and March 31, 2017. The post-BCID period was between April 1, 2017 and July 31, 2018. Fisher’s exact test, student’s t-test, and descriptive statistics were used in the analysis. RESULTS: A total of 200 patients met eligibility (pre-BCID, n = 102; post-BCID, n = 98). The composite endpoint was met in 34% of patients in the pre-BCID group and 29% in the post-BCID group (P = 0.45). Mortality at 30 days (17% vs. 17%, P = 1.00), persistent SAB (16% vs. 13%, P = 0.69), and rates of recurrence within 30 days (4% vs. 1%, P = 0.37) were similar between groups. ID consult increased after BCID implementation (83% vs. 92%, P = 0.001). More patients in the post-BCID received appropriate durations of antibiotics (75% vs. 86%, P = 0.04) and had decreased time, in hours, to definitive therapy (7 ± 17 vs. 1 ± 5, P ≤ 0.05). CONCLUSION: The management of SAB after implementation of BCID did not show a decrease in the primary outcome but did show an improved time to appropriate therapy. A larger study is needed to determine whether improved time to appropriate therapy translates to an improvement in patient outcomes. [Image: see text] DISCLOSURES: All authors: No reported disclosures. Oxford University Press 2019-10-23 /pmc/articles/PMC6809936/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofz360.271 Text en © The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial reproduction and distribution of the work, in any medium, provided the original work is not altered or transformed in any way, and that the work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Abstracts
Nguyen, Kiet
McKamey, Lacie
Green, Sarah
196. Impact of BioFire FilmArray® Blood Culture Identification on the Management of Staphylococcus aureus Bacteremia
title 196. Impact of BioFire FilmArray® Blood Culture Identification on the Management of Staphylococcus aureus Bacteremia
title_full 196. Impact of BioFire FilmArray® Blood Culture Identification on the Management of Staphylococcus aureus Bacteremia
title_fullStr 196. Impact of BioFire FilmArray® Blood Culture Identification on the Management of Staphylococcus aureus Bacteremia
title_full_unstemmed 196. Impact of BioFire FilmArray® Blood Culture Identification on the Management of Staphylococcus aureus Bacteremia
title_short 196. Impact of BioFire FilmArray® Blood Culture Identification on the Management of Staphylococcus aureus Bacteremia
title_sort 196. impact of biofire filmarray® blood culture identification on the management of staphylococcus aureus bacteremia
topic Abstracts
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6809936/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofz360.271
work_keys_str_mv AT nguyenkiet 196impactofbiofirefilmarraybloodcultureidentificationonthemanagementofstaphylococcusaureusbacteremia
AT mckameylacie 196impactofbiofirefilmarraybloodcultureidentificationonthemanagementofstaphylococcusaureusbacteremia
AT greensarah 196impactofbiofirefilmarraybloodcultureidentificationonthemanagementofstaphylococcusaureusbacteremia