Cargando…

191. Appropriateness of Empiric Antibiotics for Enterobacteriaceae Bacteremia

BACKGROUND: Appropriate empiric antibiotic therapy is associated with decreased mortality and recurrence in patients with Enterobacteriaceae bacteremia (EB). Increasing bacterial resistance adds an additional layer to this complex clinical scenario. Swift utilization of appropriate antibiotics is cr...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Smith, Brandon J, Kois, Abigail, Gartland, Nathan, Tholany, Joseph, Arbulu, Ricardo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6809945/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofz360.266
_version_ 1783462124684574720
author Smith, Brandon J
Kois, Abigail
Gartland, Nathan
Tholany, Joseph
Arbulu, Ricardo
author_facet Smith, Brandon J
Kois, Abigail
Gartland, Nathan
Tholany, Joseph
Arbulu, Ricardo
author_sort Smith, Brandon J
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Appropriate empiric antibiotic therapy is associated with decreased mortality and recurrence in patients with Enterobacteriaceae bacteremia (EB). Increasing bacterial resistance adds an additional layer to this complex clinical scenario. Swift utilization of appropriate antibiotics is crucial for improved patient outcomes. However, prolonged and excessively broad antibiotic coverage is not without its own complications. Our study aimed to review the appropriateness of empiric antibiotics for EB. METHODS: A retrospective chart review of all patients >18 years of age who were admitted to a single academic community hospital during 2018 EB anytime throughout their hospitalization. The primary endpoint was the appropriateness of empiric antibiotic therapy, defined as receiving active therapy prior to the return of antimicrobial sensitivities that were susceptible to the empiric agents used. Appropriateness was further adjusted for standard of care (SOC) practices. Specifically, despite in vitro susceptibility of piperacillin/tazobactam and cefepime, carbapenem therapy is preferred for ESBL infections. RESULTS: Our study identified 178 patients with EB. Most common organisms included E.coli (64.6%), K. pneumoniae (11.8%) and P. mirabilis (7.3%). Resistance patterns included 1 CRE (0.57%) and 17 ESBL (9.7%) isolates. Most common sources of infection included urinary (63.5%) and intraabdominal (13.5%). Based on the sensitivity reports of tested isolates, 83.7% of patients received appropriate empiric antibiotics. After adjustment for SOC, 11.8% of ESBL patients (2/17) and 0% of CRE (0/1) patients received appropriate therapy. Comparatively 89.0% of patients without ESBL or CRE (137/154) received appropriate care (P < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: The results of this study demonstrate that across our patient population, over 80% of patients received appropriate empiric antibiotics for EB; however, this percentage was dramatically lower for patients with ESBL or CRE infections. This highlights room for improved rapid diagnosis and identification of risk factors predisposing to resistant organisms thereby decreasing the time to appropriate antibiotic therapy. [Image: see text] [Image: see text] DISCLOSURES: All authors: No reported disclosures.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6809945
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-68099452019-10-28 191. Appropriateness of Empiric Antibiotics for Enterobacteriaceae Bacteremia Smith, Brandon J Kois, Abigail Gartland, Nathan Tholany, Joseph Arbulu, Ricardo Open Forum Infect Dis Abstracts BACKGROUND: Appropriate empiric antibiotic therapy is associated with decreased mortality and recurrence in patients with Enterobacteriaceae bacteremia (EB). Increasing bacterial resistance adds an additional layer to this complex clinical scenario. Swift utilization of appropriate antibiotics is crucial for improved patient outcomes. However, prolonged and excessively broad antibiotic coverage is not without its own complications. Our study aimed to review the appropriateness of empiric antibiotics for EB. METHODS: A retrospective chart review of all patients >18 years of age who were admitted to a single academic community hospital during 2018 EB anytime throughout their hospitalization. The primary endpoint was the appropriateness of empiric antibiotic therapy, defined as receiving active therapy prior to the return of antimicrobial sensitivities that were susceptible to the empiric agents used. Appropriateness was further adjusted for standard of care (SOC) practices. Specifically, despite in vitro susceptibility of piperacillin/tazobactam and cefepime, carbapenem therapy is preferred for ESBL infections. RESULTS: Our study identified 178 patients with EB. Most common organisms included E.coli (64.6%), K. pneumoniae (11.8%) and P. mirabilis (7.3%). Resistance patterns included 1 CRE (0.57%) and 17 ESBL (9.7%) isolates. Most common sources of infection included urinary (63.5%) and intraabdominal (13.5%). Based on the sensitivity reports of tested isolates, 83.7% of patients received appropriate empiric antibiotics. After adjustment for SOC, 11.8% of ESBL patients (2/17) and 0% of CRE (0/1) patients received appropriate therapy. Comparatively 89.0% of patients without ESBL or CRE (137/154) received appropriate care (P < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: The results of this study demonstrate that across our patient population, over 80% of patients received appropriate empiric antibiotics for EB; however, this percentage was dramatically lower for patients with ESBL or CRE infections. This highlights room for improved rapid diagnosis and identification of risk factors predisposing to resistant organisms thereby decreasing the time to appropriate antibiotic therapy. [Image: see text] [Image: see text] DISCLOSURES: All authors: No reported disclosures. Oxford University Press 2019-10-23 /pmc/articles/PMC6809945/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofz360.266 Text en © The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial reproduction and distribution of the work, in any medium, provided the original work is not altered or transformed in any way, and that the work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Abstracts
Smith, Brandon J
Kois, Abigail
Gartland, Nathan
Tholany, Joseph
Arbulu, Ricardo
191. Appropriateness of Empiric Antibiotics for Enterobacteriaceae Bacteremia
title 191. Appropriateness of Empiric Antibiotics for Enterobacteriaceae Bacteremia
title_full 191. Appropriateness of Empiric Antibiotics for Enterobacteriaceae Bacteremia
title_fullStr 191. Appropriateness of Empiric Antibiotics for Enterobacteriaceae Bacteremia
title_full_unstemmed 191. Appropriateness of Empiric Antibiotics for Enterobacteriaceae Bacteremia
title_short 191. Appropriateness of Empiric Antibiotics for Enterobacteriaceae Bacteremia
title_sort 191. appropriateness of empiric antibiotics for enterobacteriaceae bacteremia
topic Abstracts
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6809945/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofz360.266
work_keys_str_mv AT smithbrandonj 191appropriatenessofempiricantibioticsforenterobacteriaceaebacteremia
AT koisabigail 191appropriatenessofempiricantibioticsforenterobacteriaceaebacteremia
AT gartlandnathan 191appropriatenessofempiricantibioticsforenterobacteriaceaebacteremia
AT tholanyjoseph 191appropriatenessofempiricantibioticsforenterobacteriaceaebacteremia
AT arbuluricardo 191appropriatenessofempiricantibioticsforenterobacteriaceaebacteremia