Cargando…

149. Short vs. Long Course of Antibiotics for Uncomplicated Gram-Negative Bacteremia

BACKGROUND: Bloodstream infections (BSI) continue to be a major cause of morbidity and mortality in the United States; thus, the correct choice of antibiotics for an appropriate duration is imperative. However, there are limited recommendations on adequate duration of treatment of bacteremia caused...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Go, James, Cotner, Sarah, Burgess, Donna R, Burgess, David, Wallace, Katie, VanHoose, Jeremy, Arora, Vaneet, Li, Nannan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6809949/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofz360.224
_version_ 1783462125615710208
author Go, James
Cotner, Sarah
Burgess, Donna R
Burgess, David
Wallace, Katie
VanHoose, Jeremy
Arora, Vaneet
Li, Nannan
author_facet Go, James
Cotner, Sarah
Burgess, Donna R
Burgess, David
Wallace, Katie
VanHoose, Jeremy
Arora, Vaneet
Li, Nannan
author_sort Go, James
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Bloodstream infections (BSI) continue to be a major cause of morbidity and mortality in the United States; thus, the correct choice of antibiotics for an appropriate duration is imperative. However, there are limited recommendations on adequate duration of treatment of bacteremia caused by Gram-negative organisms. Therefore, treating an infection for an adequate duration to prevent complications while preventing adverse effects from unnecessary antibiotic exposure remains a balancing act. This study aims to compare clinical outcomes between patients treated with a short (7–10 days) vs. long (11–20 days) course of antibiotics for uncomplicated gram-negative bacteremia. METHODS: This single-center retrospective cohort study evaluated adult patients admitted between January 2007 to October 2018 with a blood culture positive for gram-negative bacteria. Data came from the University of Kentucky Microbiological Laboratory and Center for Clinical and Translational Science (CCTS) Data Bank. Patients included must have received appropriate antibiotics for at least 7 days. Appropriate antibiotics were defined as those to which the organism is susceptible with day one of therapy as the first day of appropriate antibiotic therapy. Patients were excluded if they were treated with aminoglycoside monotherapy, had polymicrobial bacteremia, or if treated for longer than 20 days of therapy. RESULTS: A total of 466 patients were identified (208 in the short-course group and 258 in the long course group). Gender and ethnicity were similar across both groups. The patients in the long course group had more ICU admissions compared with the short-course group (52.7% vs. 43.3%, P = 0.0426), tended to be older (57 ± 16.7 vs. 53 ± 15.9 years, P = 0.0119), had a higher Charlson Comorbidity Index (5.7 ± 3.6 vs. 4.6 ± 3.6, P = 0.0009) and remained admitted to the hospital longer (23.2 ± 25.6 vs. 15.8 ± 17.5 days, P = 0.0002). However, patients treated with a long course had no difference in 30-day mortality compared with the short-course group (3.9% vs. 3.4%, P = 0.7701). CONCLUSION: Patients with an uncomplicated gram-negative BSI treated with a short course (7–10 days) of antibiotics do not appear to have a significant difference in 30-day mortality compared with those patients treated with a long course (11–20 days). DISCLOSURES: All authors: No reported disclosures.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6809949
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-68099492019-10-28 149. Short vs. Long Course of Antibiotics for Uncomplicated Gram-Negative Bacteremia Go, James Cotner, Sarah Burgess, Donna R Burgess, David Wallace, Katie VanHoose, Jeremy Arora, Vaneet Li, Nannan Open Forum Infect Dis Abstracts BACKGROUND: Bloodstream infections (BSI) continue to be a major cause of morbidity and mortality in the United States; thus, the correct choice of antibiotics for an appropriate duration is imperative. However, there are limited recommendations on adequate duration of treatment of bacteremia caused by Gram-negative organisms. Therefore, treating an infection for an adequate duration to prevent complications while preventing adverse effects from unnecessary antibiotic exposure remains a balancing act. This study aims to compare clinical outcomes between patients treated with a short (7–10 days) vs. long (11–20 days) course of antibiotics for uncomplicated gram-negative bacteremia. METHODS: This single-center retrospective cohort study evaluated adult patients admitted between January 2007 to October 2018 with a blood culture positive for gram-negative bacteria. Data came from the University of Kentucky Microbiological Laboratory and Center for Clinical and Translational Science (CCTS) Data Bank. Patients included must have received appropriate antibiotics for at least 7 days. Appropriate antibiotics were defined as those to which the organism is susceptible with day one of therapy as the first day of appropriate antibiotic therapy. Patients were excluded if they were treated with aminoglycoside monotherapy, had polymicrobial bacteremia, or if treated for longer than 20 days of therapy. RESULTS: A total of 466 patients were identified (208 in the short-course group and 258 in the long course group). Gender and ethnicity were similar across both groups. The patients in the long course group had more ICU admissions compared with the short-course group (52.7% vs. 43.3%, P = 0.0426), tended to be older (57 ± 16.7 vs. 53 ± 15.9 years, P = 0.0119), had a higher Charlson Comorbidity Index (5.7 ± 3.6 vs. 4.6 ± 3.6, P = 0.0009) and remained admitted to the hospital longer (23.2 ± 25.6 vs. 15.8 ± 17.5 days, P = 0.0002). However, patients treated with a long course had no difference in 30-day mortality compared with the short-course group (3.9% vs. 3.4%, P = 0.7701). CONCLUSION: Patients with an uncomplicated gram-negative BSI treated with a short course (7–10 days) of antibiotics do not appear to have a significant difference in 30-day mortality compared with those patients treated with a long course (11–20 days). DISCLOSURES: All authors: No reported disclosures. Oxford University Press 2019-10-23 /pmc/articles/PMC6809949/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofz360.224 Text en © The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial reproduction and distribution of the work, in any medium, provided the original work is not altered or transformed in any way, and that the work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Abstracts
Go, James
Cotner, Sarah
Burgess, Donna R
Burgess, David
Wallace, Katie
VanHoose, Jeremy
Arora, Vaneet
Li, Nannan
149. Short vs. Long Course of Antibiotics for Uncomplicated Gram-Negative Bacteremia
title 149. Short vs. Long Course of Antibiotics for Uncomplicated Gram-Negative Bacteremia
title_full 149. Short vs. Long Course of Antibiotics for Uncomplicated Gram-Negative Bacteremia
title_fullStr 149. Short vs. Long Course of Antibiotics for Uncomplicated Gram-Negative Bacteremia
title_full_unstemmed 149. Short vs. Long Course of Antibiotics for Uncomplicated Gram-Negative Bacteremia
title_short 149. Short vs. Long Course of Antibiotics for Uncomplicated Gram-Negative Bacteremia
title_sort 149. short vs. long course of antibiotics for uncomplicated gram-negative bacteremia
topic Abstracts
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6809949/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofz360.224
work_keys_str_mv AT gojames 149shortvslongcourseofantibioticsforuncomplicatedgramnegativebacteremia
AT cotnersarah 149shortvslongcourseofantibioticsforuncomplicatedgramnegativebacteremia
AT burgessdonnar 149shortvslongcourseofantibioticsforuncomplicatedgramnegativebacteremia
AT burgessdavid 149shortvslongcourseofantibioticsforuncomplicatedgramnegativebacteremia
AT wallacekatie 149shortvslongcourseofantibioticsforuncomplicatedgramnegativebacteremia
AT vanhoosejeremy 149shortvslongcourseofantibioticsforuncomplicatedgramnegativebacteremia
AT aroravaneet 149shortvslongcourseofantibioticsforuncomplicatedgramnegativebacteremia
AT linannan 149shortvslongcourseofantibioticsforuncomplicatedgramnegativebacteremia