Cargando…

2351. Rate and Consequences of Missed Clostridioides (Clostridium) difficile Infection Diagnosis from Non-disclosure of Clostridioides difficile Multiplex PCR Results. Two-Hospital Experience

BACKGROUND: It is common practice among microbiology laboratories in the United States to blind the BioFire FilmArray GI Panel results for Clostridioides (Clostridium) difficile (C. difficile) in fear of over-diagnosis of C. difficile infection (CDI). METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort stu...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zacharioudakis, Ioannis, Zervou, Fainareti, Phillips, Michael, Aguero-Rosenfeld, Maria E
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6810000/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofz360.2029
_version_ 1783462139444330496
author Zacharioudakis, Ioannis
Zervou, Fainareti
Phillips, Michael
Aguero-Rosenfeld, Maria E
author_facet Zacharioudakis, Ioannis
Zervou, Fainareti
Phillips, Michael
Aguero-Rosenfeld, Maria E
author_sort Zacharioudakis, Ioannis
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: It is common practice among microbiology laboratories in the United States to blind the BioFire FilmArray GI Panel results for Clostridioides (Clostridium) difficile (C. difficile) in fear of over-diagnosis of C. difficile infection (CDI). METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study in 2 tertiary academic centers in New York to examine the rate of missed CDI diagnosis and the associated adverse outcomes from blinding the BioFire FilmArray GI Panel results for C. difficile. Of note, in one of the two included hospitals the list of daily positives is reviewed by an Infectious Diseases attending to determine whether cases have been tested for CDI and if not if they meet criteria for CDI. Adult patients with FilmArray GI Panel positive for C. difficile on admission to the hospital who lacked dedicated testing for C. difficile were included in the analysis and were stratified as possible, probable and definite cases of missed CDI diagnosis. RESULTS: Among the 144 adult patients with a FilmArray GI Panel test positive for C. difficile within 48 hours of hospital admission, 18 did not have a concurrent dedicated C. difficile testing. Eight patients were categorized as possible cases of missed CDI diagnosis, 5 as probable and 4 as definite, for a total of 17 cases of at least possibly missed CDI diagnosis. One case was considered to represent C. difficile colonization rather than infection for a rate of 6.9% of CDI over-diagnosis based on the FilmArray GI Panel results. Missed CDI diagnoses were associated with a delay in initiation of appropriate therapy, admission to the intensive care unit, hospital re-admission, colorectal surgery and death/discharge to hospice. Five out of 17 cases of missed CDI diagnosis (29.4%) lacked traditional risk factors for CDI. CONCLUSION: In conclusion, the practice of concealing FilmArray GI Panel results for C. difficile may lead to a higher rate of missed CDI diagnosis than over-diagnosis and might need to be re-considered at least in patients with community-onset colitis of unknown etiology on presentation to the hospital. DISCLOSURES: All authors: No reported disclosures.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6810000
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-68100002019-10-28 2351. Rate and Consequences of Missed Clostridioides (Clostridium) difficile Infection Diagnosis from Non-disclosure of Clostridioides difficile Multiplex PCR Results. Two-Hospital Experience Zacharioudakis, Ioannis Zervou, Fainareti Phillips, Michael Aguero-Rosenfeld, Maria E Open Forum Infect Dis Abstracts BACKGROUND: It is common practice among microbiology laboratories in the United States to blind the BioFire FilmArray GI Panel results for Clostridioides (Clostridium) difficile (C. difficile) in fear of over-diagnosis of C. difficile infection (CDI). METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study in 2 tertiary academic centers in New York to examine the rate of missed CDI diagnosis and the associated adverse outcomes from blinding the BioFire FilmArray GI Panel results for C. difficile. Of note, in one of the two included hospitals the list of daily positives is reviewed by an Infectious Diseases attending to determine whether cases have been tested for CDI and if not if they meet criteria for CDI. Adult patients with FilmArray GI Panel positive for C. difficile on admission to the hospital who lacked dedicated testing for C. difficile were included in the analysis and were stratified as possible, probable and definite cases of missed CDI diagnosis. RESULTS: Among the 144 adult patients with a FilmArray GI Panel test positive for C. difficile within 48 hours of hospital admission, 18 did not have a concurrent dedicated C. difficile testing. Eight patients were categorized as possible cases of missed CDI diagnosis, 5 as probable and 4 as definite, for a total of 17 cases of at least possibly missed CDI diagnosis. One case was considered to represent C. difficile colonization rather than infection for a rate of 6.9% of CDI over-diagnosis based on the FilmArray GI Panel results. Missed CDI diagnoses were associated with a delay in initiation of appropriate therapy, admission to the intensive care unit, hospital re-admission, colorectal surgery and death/discharge to hospice. Five out of 17 cases of missed CDI diagnosis (29.4%) lacked traditional risk factors for CDI. CONCLUSION: In conclusion, the practice of concealing FilmArray GI Panel results for C. difficile may lead to a higher rate of missed CDI diagnosis than over-diagnosis and might need to be re-considered at least in patients with community-onset colitis of unknown etiology on presentation to the hospital. DISCLOSURES: All authors: No reported disclosures. Oxford University Press 2019-10-23 /pmc/articles/PMC6810000/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofz360.2029 Text en © The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial reproduction and distribution of the work, in any medium, provided the original work is not altered or transformed in any way, and that the work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Abstracts
Zacharioudakis, Ioannis
Zervou, Fainareti
Phillips, Michael
Aguero-Rosenfeld, Maria E
2351. Rate and Consequences of Missed Clostridioides (Clostridium) difficile Infection Diagnosis from Non-disclosure of Clostridioides difficile Multiplex PCR Results. Two-Hospital Experience
title 2351. Rate and Consequences of Missed Clostridioides (Clostridium) difficile Infection Diagnosis from Non-disclosure of Clostridioides difficile Multiplex PCR Results. Two-Hospital Experience
title_full 2351. Rate and Consequences of Missed Clostridioides (Clostridium) difficile Infection Diagnosis from Non-disclosure of Clostridioides difficile Multiplex PCR Results. Two-Hospital Experience
title_fullStr 2351. Rate and Consequences of Missed Clostridioides (Clostridium) difficile Infection Diagnosis from Non-disclosure of Clostridioides difficile Multiplex PCR Results. Two-Hospital Experience
title_full_unstemmed 2351. Rate and Consequences of Missed Clostridioides (Clostridium) difficile Infection Diagnosis from Non-disclosure of Clostridioides difficile Multiplex PCR Results. Two-Hospital Experience
title_short 2351. Rate and Consequences of Missed Clostridioides (Clostridium) difficile Infection Diagnosis from Non-disclosure of Clostridioides difficile Multiplex PCR Results. Two-Hospital Experience
title_sort 2351. rate and consequences of missed clostridioides (clostridium) difficile infection diagnosis from non-disclosure of clostridioides difficile multiplex pcr results. two-hospital experience
topic Abstracts
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6810000/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofz360.2029
work_keys_str_mv AT zacharioudakisioannis 2351rateandconsequencesofmissedclostridioidesclostridiumdifficileinfectiondiagnosisfromnondisclosureofclostridioidesdifficilemultiplexpcrresultstwohospitalexperience
AT zervoufainareti 2351rateandconsequencesofmissedclostridioidesclostridiumdifficileinfectiondiagnosisfromnondisclosureofclostridioidesdifficilemultiplexpcrresultstwohospitalexperience
AT phillipsmichael 2351rateandconsequencesofmissedclostridioidesclostridiumdifficileinfectiondiagnosisfromnondisclosureofclostridioidesdifficilemultiplexpcrresultstwohospitalexperience
AT aguerorosenfeldmariae 2351rateandconsequencesofmissedclostridioidesclostridiumdifficileinfectiondiagnosisfromnondisclosureofclostridioidesdifficilemultiplexpcrresultstwohospitalexperience