Cargando…

2583. Short-term Impact of Antimicrobial Exposure on Fecal Carriage of Resistant Microorganisms

BACKGROUND: The relationship between antimicrobial use and subsequent resistance is complicated; this study assesses the short-term impact of antimicrobial use on fecal carriage of resistant microorganisms. This is a sub-study of an ongoing trial comparing 7 vs. 14 days of antimicrobial treatment fo...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ahmad, Abdul, Amundson, Carla, Clabots, Connie, Porter, Stephen, Johnson, James R, Drekonja, Dimitri M
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6810136/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofz360.2261
_version_ 1783462174101864448
author Ahmad, Abdul
Amundson, Carla
Clabots, Connie
Porter, Stephen
Johnson, James R
Drekonja, Dimitri M
author_facet Ahmad, Abdul
Amundson, Carla
Clabots, Connie
Porter, Stephen
Johnson, James R
Drekonja, Dimitri M
author_sort Ahmad, Abdul
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The relationship between antimicrobial use and subsequent resistance is complicated; this study assesses the short-term impact of antimicrobial use on fecal carriage of resistant microorganisms. This is a sub-study of an ongoing trial comparing 7 vs. 14 days of antimicrobial treatment for male urinary tract infection. This analysis quantifies the effect of 1–2 weeks of systemic antimicrobial use on the fecal flora within 1 week of completing therapy. METHODS: The parent study has enrolled 216 subjects, with 178 enrolled in the optional resistance sub-study. Subjects received either ciprofloxacin or trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole (SXT), randomized to 7 vs. 14 days therapy. Subjects provided 2 stool specimens, 1 during treatment and 1 a week after completing study medication. Samples were plated on media for Gram-positive and negative growth, including T-7 plates with ciprofloxacin and SXT added to select for resistant organisms. Resistance to 22 antimicrobials was assessed, with resistance reported by: number of isolates with any antimicrobial resistance, total number of resistant drugs/isolate, and number of isolates with multi-drug resistance (resistance to 3 or more different antimicrobial classes). RESULTS: Overall, 143 (80%) subjects provided 2 stool samples, with 104 (73%) having growth from at least 1 of the samples. Fifty-one of 143 (36%) had microbial growth from both samples. From these 51 paired samples, there were 255 total strains isolated (117 from the first sample, 138 from the second), with some yielding multiple organisms (range, 1–5). From sample 1, 110/117 (94%) isolates had any antimicrobial resistance, vs. 131/138 (95%) from sample 2 (P = .79). Mean number of resistant drugs/isolate was 7.4 in sample 1 and 5.8 in sample 2 (P = .009). Multi-drug resistance was seen in 102/117 (87%) isolates from sample 1 vs. 85/138 (62%) isolates in sample 2 (P < .001). CONCLUSION: The fecal flora of patients on antimicrobial therapy for UTI has a significant increase in resistant microorganisms compared with samples obtained shortly after antimicrobial completion. This may reflect repopulation of the fecal flora with less-resistant strains after the selection pressure of therapy has been removed. After unblinding, we will assess if differences in resistance are affected by therapy duration. DISCLOSURES: All authors: No reported disclosures.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6810136
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-68101362019-10-28 2583. Short-term Impact of Antimicrobial Exposure on Fecal Carriage of Resistant Microorganisms Ahmad, Abdul Amundson, Carla Clabots, Connie Porter, Stephen Johnson, James R Drekonja, Dimitri M Open Forum Infect Dis Abstracts BACKGROUND: The relationship between antimicrobial use and subsequent resistance is complicated; this study assesses the short-term impact of antimicrobial use on fecal carriage of resistant microorganisms. This is a sub-study of an ongoing trial comparing 7 vs. 14 days of antimicrobial treatment for male urinary tract infection. This analysis quantifies the effect of 1–2 weeks of systemic antimicrobial use on the fecal flora within 1 week of completing therapy. METHODS: The parent study has enrolled 216 subjects, with 178 enrolled in the optional resistance sub-study. Subjects received either ciprofloxacin or trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole (SXT), randomized to 7 vs. 14 days therapy. Subjects provided 2 stool specimens, 1 during treatment and 1 a week after completing study medication. Samples were plated on media for Gram-positive and negative growth, including T-7 plates with ciprofloxacin and SXT added to select for resistant organisms. Resistance to 22 antimicrobials was assessed, with resistance reported by: number of isolates with any antimicrobial resistance, total number of resistant drugs/isolate, and number of isolates with multi-drug resistance (resistance to 3 or more different antimicrobial classes). RESULTS: Overall, 143 (80%) subjects provided 2 stool samples, with 104 (73%) having growth from at least 1 of the samples. Fifty-one of 143 (36%) had microbial growth from both samples. From these 51 paired samples, there were 255 total strains isolated (117 from the first sample, 138 from the second), with some yielding multiple organisms (range, 1–5). From sample 1, 110/117 (94%) isolates had any antimicrobial resistance, vs. 131/138 (95%) from sample 2 (P = .79). Mean number of resistant drugs/isolate was 7.4 in sample 1 and 5.8 in sample 2 (P = .009). Multi-drug resistance was seen in 102/117 (87%) isolates from sample 1 vs. 85/138 (62%) isolates in sample 2 (P < .001). CONCLUSION: The fecal flora of patients on antimicrobial therapy for UTI has a significant increase in resistant microorganisms compared with samples obtained shortly after antimicrobial completion. This may reflect repopulation of the fecal flora with less-resistant strains after the selection pressure of therapy has been removed. After unblinding, we will assess if differences in resistance are affected by therapy duration. DISCLOSURES: All authors: No reported disclosures. Oxford University Press 2019-10-23 /pmc/articles/PMC6810136/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofz360.2261 Text en © The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial reproduction and distribution of the work, in any medium, provided the original work is not altered or transformed in any way, and that the work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Abstracts
Ahmad, Abdul
Amundson, Carla
Clabots, Connie
Porter, Stephen
Johnson, James R
Drekonja, Dimitri M
2583. Short-term Impact of Antimicrobial Exposure on Fecal Carriage of Resistant Microorganisms
title 2583. Short-term Impact of Antimicrobial Exposure on Fecal Carriage of Resistant Microorganisms
title_full 2583. Short-term Impact of Antimicrobial Exposure on Fecal Carriage of Resistant Microorganisms
title_fullStr 2583. Short-term Impact of Antimicrobial Exposure on Fecal Carriage of Resistant Microorganisms
title_full_unstemmed 2583. Short-term Impact of Antimicrobial Exposure on Fecal Carriage of Resistant Microorganisms
title_short 2583. Short-term Impact of Antimicrobial Exposure on Fecal Carriage of Resistant Microorganisms
title_sort 2583. short-term impact of antimicrobial exposure on fecal carriage of resistant microorganisms
topic Abstracts
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6810136/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofz360.2261
work_keys_str_mv AT ahmadabdul 2583shorttermimpactofantimicrobialexposureonfecalcarriageofresistantmicroorganisms
AT amundsoncarla 2583shorttermimpactofantimicrobialexposureonfecalcarriageofresistantmicroorganisms
AT clabotsconnie 2583shorttermimpactofantimicrobialexposureonfecalcarriageofresistantmicroorganisms
AT porterstephen 2583shorttermimpactofantimicrobialexposureonfecalcarriageofresistantmicroorganisms
AT johnsonjamesr 2583shorttermimpactofantimicrobialexposureonfecalcarriageofresistantmicroorganisms
AT drekonjadimitrim 2583shorttermimpactofantimicrobialexposureonfecalcarriageofresistantmicroorganisms