Cargando…
194. Description of Positive Blood Culture Results not Identified by Verigene Informs Empiric Antibiotic Selection
BACKGROUND: Bloodstream infections are a leading cause of mortality amongst hospitalized patients. Optimizing time to pathogen identification and receipt of appropriate antibiotic therapy significantly decreases mortality, morbidity, and length of hospitalization. Rapid diagnostic tests, such as Ver...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6810144/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofz360.269 |
_version_ | 1783462176521977856 |
---|---|
author | Deri, Connor Nesbitt, Whitney Nelson, George Keefe, Jessica |
author_facet | Deri, Connor Nesbitt, Whitney Nelson, George Keefe, Jessica |
author_sort | Deri, Connor |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Bloodstream infections are a leading cause of mortality amongst hospitalized patients. Optimizing time to pathogen identification and receipt of appropriate antibiotic therapy significantly decreases mortality, morbidity, and length of hospitalization. Rapid diagnostic tests, such as Verigene, assist in the early identification of bacteria and resistance determinants from positive blood cultures; however, Verigene assays are limited to the detection of 13 gram-positive and 9 gram-negative bacteria. METHODS: The purpose of this study was to describe gram-negative and gram-positive aerobic bacteria identified from positive blood cultures with no Verigene target detected and to use the susceptibilities to create an antibiogram to assist in empiric antibiotic selection. A total of 2325 positive blood cultures resulted between January 2017 and October 2018 underwent Verigene testing. RESULTS: Of the 2325 isolates, 383 (16.5%), had no Verigene organism or resistance mechanism detected. Of these, there were 239 (62.4%) gram-positive isolates, 141 (36.8%) gram-negative isolates, and 3 yeast isolates with 96 unique organisms. Seventy-six (19.8%) of the organisms identified by standard culture, but not Verigene testing, are included on Verigene panel. We analyzed nine common antibiotics active against gram-negative organisms to determine percent susceptibilities against the isolated aerobic pathogens: amikacin (92.1%), cefepime (93.5%), ceftazidime (94.0%), ceftriaxone (79.7%), ciprofloxacin (88.5%), gentamicin (91.9%), levofloxacin (86.9%), piperacillin–tazobactam (83.8%), and tobramycin (85.5%). Additionally, four antibiotics active against gram-positive organisms were analyzed for gram-positive susceptibilities: cefotaxime (91.8%), ceftriaxone (98.1%), levofloxacin (82.5%), and vancomycin (91.8%). CONCLUSION: The results of this study provide clinicians with antibiotic susceptibilities against organisms that were not identified through Verigene to better guide timely and appropriate antibiotic therapy against gram-negative and gram-positive aerobic bacteria. DISCLOSURES: All authors: No reported disclosures. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6810144 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-68101442019-10-28 194. Description of Positive Blood Culture Results not Identified by Verigene Informs Empiric Antibiotic Selection Deri, Connor Nesbitt, Whitney Nelson, George Keefe, Jessica Open Forum Infect Dis Abstracts BACKGROUND: Bloodstream infections are a leading cause of mortality amongst hospitalized patients. Optimizing time to pathogen identification and receipt of appropriate antibiotic therapy significantly decreases mortality, morbidity, and length of hospitalization. Rapid diagnostic tests, such as Verigene, assist in the early identification of bacteria and resistance determinants from positive blood cultures; however, Verigene assays are limited to the detection of 13 gram-positive and 9 gram-negative bacteria. METHODS: The purpose of this study was to describe gram-negative and gram-positive aerobic bacteria identified from positive blood cultures with no Verigene target detected and to use the susceptibilities to create an antibiogram to assist in empiric antibiotic selection. A total of 2325 positive blood cultures resulted between January 2017 and October 2018 underwent Verigene testing. RESULTS: Of the 2325 isolates, 383 (16.5%), had no Verigene organism or resistance mechanism detected. Of these, there were 239 (62.4%) gram-positive isolates, 141 (36.8%) gram-negative isolates, and 3 yeast isolates with 96 unique organisms. Seventy-six (19.8%) of the organisms identified by standard culture, but not Verigene testing, are included on Verigene panel. We analyzed nine common antibiotics active against gram-negative organisms to determine percent susceptibilities against the isolated aerobic pathogens: amikacin (92.1%), cefepime (93.5%), ceftazidime (94.0%), ceftriaxone (79.7%), ciprofloxacin (88.5%), gentamicin (91.9%), levofloxacin (86.9%), piperacillin–tazobactam (83.8%), and tobramycin (85.5%). Additionally, four antibiotics active against gram-positive organisms were analyzed for gram-positive susceptibilities: cefotaxime (91.8%), ceftriaxone (98.1%), levofloxacin (82.5%), and vancomycin (91.8%). CONCLUSION: The results of this study provide clinicians with antibiotic susceptibilities against organisms that were not identified through Verigene to better guide timely and appropriate antibiotic therapy against gram-negative and gram-positive aerobic bacteria. DISCLOSURES: All authors: No reported disclosures. Oxford University Press 2019-10-23 /pmc/articles/PMC6810144/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofz360.269 Text en © The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial reproduction and distribution of the work, in any medium, provided the original work is not altered or transformed in any way, and that the work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com |
spellingShingle | Abstracts Deri, Connor Nesbitt, Whitney Nelson, George Keefe, Jessica 194. Description of Positive Blood Culture Results not Identified by Verigene Informs Empiric Antibiotic Selection |
title | 194. Description of Positive Blood Culture Results not Identified by Verigene Informs Empiric Antibiotic Selection |
title_full | 194. Description of Positive Blood Culture Results not Identified by Verigene Informs Empiric Antibiotic Selection |
title_fullStr | 194. Description of Positive Blood Culture Results not Identified by Verigene Informs Empiric Antibiotic Selection |
title_full_unstemmed | 194. Description of Positive Blood Culture Results not Identified by Verigene Informs Empiric Antibiotic Selection |
title_short | 194. Description of Positive Blood Culture Results not Identified by Verigene Informs Empiric Antibiotic Selection |
title_sort | 194. description of positive blood culture results not identified by verigene informs empiric antibiotic selection |
topic | Abstracts |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6810144/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofz360.269 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT dericonnor 194descriptionofpositivebloodcultureresultsnotidentifiedbyverigeneinformsempiricantibioticselection AT nesbittwhitney 194descriptionofpositivebloodcultureresultsnotidentifiedbyverigeneinformsempiricantibioticselection AT nelsongeorge 194descriptionofpositivebloodcultureresultsnotidentifiedbyverigeneinformsempiricantibioticselection AT keefejessica 194descriptionofpositivebloodcultureresultsnotidentifiedbyverigeneinformsempiricantibioticselection |