Cargando…

2344. Evaluation of a Best Practice Alert (BPA) to Reduce Inappropriate Testing for Clostridium difficile Infection (CDI) Within a Multi-Hospital System

BACKGROUND: Hospital-acquired CDI contribute to significant morbidity, mortality, and cost burden in hospitalized patients. Clinical practice guidelines recommend strict testing criteria when employing nucleic acid amplification testing alone as to not test asymptomatic carriers. A BPA within the el...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Dare, Ryan K, Bewley, Claire E, Novack, Amanda J, Heiles, Jared M, Chin, Larissa K
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6810227/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofz360.2022
_version_ 1783462198717186048
author Dare, Ryan K
Bewley, Claire E
Novack, Amanda J
Heiles, Jared M
Chin, Larissa K
author_facet Dare, Ryan K
Bewley, Claire E
Novack, Amanda J
Heiles, Jared M
Chin, Larissa K
author_sort Dare, Ryan K
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Hospital-acquired CDI contribute to significant morbidity, mortality, and cost burden in hospitalized patients. Clinical practice guidelines recommend strict testing criteria when employing nucleic acid amplification testing alone as to not test asymptomatic carriers. A BPA within the electronic medical record (EMR) may assist with this screening. METHODS: At our 9-hospital system, we created a BPA to help identify patients who may not meet criteria for CDI testing. Initial BPA (January 2018) asked if patient had 3 or more stools (yes/no) and if laxatives were administered in the last 48 hours (yes/no). An expanded BPA was updated to pull medication administration records for use of laxatives in the prior 48 hours (August 2018) and notified providers of recent C. difficile testing in the past 7 days (January 2019). C. difficile orders from March 2017 (historical), March 2018 (intervention 1), and March 2019 (intervention 2) were evaluated to assess impact of these interventions. RESULTS: C. difficile testing during 30,621 (historical), 31,299 (intervention 1), and 31,960 (intervention 2) patient-days were evaluated. Rates of C. difficile orders and infections are reported in the table. Ratio of positive C. difficile specimens to tested specimens were similar between the historical arm (51 of 402; 12.7%) and both intervention 1 (42 of 271; 15.5%) and intervention 2 (45 of 316; 14.2%) arms (P = 0.3 and P = 0.5, respectively). Intervention 1 and intervention 2 arms were similar in all metrics. Statistical analysis was performed using Stata, v.14.2. CONCLUSION: Implementation of a decision support tool to assist with C. difficile testing significantly decreased order rates in both the initial and expanded BPA intervention arms. Compared with historical rates, incidence of CDI decreased in both intervention arms though these were not statistically significant. Similarly, ratio of positive specimens to specimens tested increased in both intervention arms, though not significant, indicating a trend toward improved patient selection. To improve appropriate CDI testing, further oversight and/or education is needed to accompany implementation of an EMR decision support tool, such as BPAs. [Image: see text] DISCLOSURES: All authors: No reported disclosures.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6810227
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-68102272019-10-28 2344. Evaluation of a Best Practice Alert (BPA) to Reduce Inappropriate Testing for Clostridium difficile Infection (CDI) Within a Multi-Hospital System Dare, Ryan K Bewley, Claire E Novack, Amanda J Heiles, Jared M Chin, Larissa K Open Forum Infect Dis Abstracts BACKGROUND: Hospital-acquired CDI contribute to significant morbidity, mortality, and cost burden in hospitalized patients. Clinical practice guidelines recommend strict testing criteria when employing nucleic acid amplification testing alone as to not test asymptomatic carriers. A BPA within the electronic medical record (EMR) may assist with this screening. METHODS: At our 9-hospital system, we created a BPA to help identify patients who may not meet criteria for CDI testing. Initial BPA (January 2018) asked if patient had 3 or more stools (yes/no) and if laxatives were administered in the last 48 hours (yes/no). An expanded BPA was updated to pull medication administration records for use of laxatives in the prior 48 hours (August 2018) and notified providers of recent C. difficile testing in the past 7 days (January 2019). C. difficile orders from March 2017 (historical), March 2018 (intervention 1), and March 2019 (intervention 2) were evaluated to assess impact of these interventions. RESULTS: C. difficile testing during 30,621 (historical), 31,299 (intervention 1), and 31,960 (intervention 2) patient-days were evaluated. Rates of C. difficile orders and infections are reported in the table. Ratio of positive C. difficile specimens to tested specimens were similar between the historical arm (51 of 402; 12.7%) and both intervention 1 (42 of 271; 15.5%) and intervention 2 (45 of 316; 14.2%) arms (P = 0.3 and P = 0.5, respectively). Intervention 1 and intervention 2 arms were similar in all metrics. Statistical analysis was performed using Stata, v.14.2. CONCLUSION: Implementation of a decision support tool to assist with C. difficile testing significantly decreased order rates in both the initial and expanded BPA intervention arms. Compared with historical rates, incidence of CDI decreased in both intervention arms though these were not statistically significant. Similarly, ratio of positive specimens to specimens tested increased in both intervention arms, though not significant, indicating a trend toward improved patient selection. To improve appropriate CDI testing, further oversight and/or education is needed to accompany implementation of an EMR decision support tool, such as BPAs. [Image: see text] DISCLOSURES: All authors: No reported disclosures. Oxford University Press 2019-10-23 /pmc/articles/PMC6810227/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofz360.2022 Text en © The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial reproduction and distribution of the work, in any medium, provided the original work is not altered or transformed in any way, and that the work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Abstracts
Dare, Ryan K
Bewley, Claire E
Novack, Amanda J
Heiles, Jared M
Chin, Larissa K
2344. Evaluation of a Best Practice Alert (BPA) to Reduce Inappropriate Testing for Clostridium difficile Infection (CDI) Within a Multi-Hospital System
title 2344. Evaluation of a Best Practice Alert (BPA) to Reduce Inappropriate Testing for Clostridium difficile Infection (CDI) Within a Multi-Hospital System
title_full 2344. Evaluation of a Best Practice Alert (BPA) to Reduce Inappropriate Testing for Clostridium difficile Infection (CDI) Within a Multi-Hospital System
title_fullStr 2344. Evaluation of a Best Practice Alert (BPA) to Reduce Inappropriate Testing for Clostridium difficile Infection (CDI) Within a Multi-Hospital System
title_full_unstemmed 2344. Evaluation of a Best Practice Alert (BPA) to Reduce Inappropriate Testing for Clostridium difficile Infection (CDI) Within a Multi-Hospital System
title_short 2344. Evaluation of a Best Practice Alert (BPA) to Reduce Inappropriate Testing for Clostridium difficile Infection (CDI) Within a Multi-Hospital System
title_sort 2344. evaluation of a best practice alert (bpa) to reduce inappropriate testing for clostridium difficile infection (cdi) within a multi-hospital system
topic Abstracts
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6810227/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofz360.2022
work_keys_str_mv AT dareryank 2344evaluationofabestpracticealertbpatoreduceinappropriatetestingforclostridiumdifficileinfectioncdiwithinamultihospitalsystem
AT bewleyclairee 2344evaluationofabestpracticealertbpatoreduceinappropriatetestingforclostridiumdifficileinfectioncdiwithinamultihospitalsystem
AT novackamandaj 2344evaluationofabestpracticealertbpatoreduceinappropriatetestingforclostridiumdifficileinfectioncdiwithinamultihospitalsystem
AT heilesjaredm 2344evaluationofabestpracticealertbpatoreduceinappropriatetestingforclostridiumdifficileinfectioncdiwithinamultihospitalsystem
AT chinlarissak 2344evaluationofabestpracticealertbpatoreduceinappropriatetestingforclostridiumdifficileinfectioncdiwithinamultihospitalsystem