Cargando…
2373. Impact of a Change in Testing Strategy for Clostridioides difficile Infection on a Publicly Reported Metric and Treatment Days of Therapy
BACKGROUND: In an effort to optimize diagnostic testing for Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) our health system changed from stand-alone PCR testing to a “2-step” approach wherein all positive PCR results reflexed to an EIA. We report the effects of this change on publicly reported CDI metric...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6810230/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofz360.2051 |
_version_ | 1783462199460626432 |
---|---|
author | Miller, Ryan Morillas, Jose A Sitaras, Joanne Bako, Jacob Neuner, Elizabeth A Gordon, Steven M Brizendine, Kyle D Fraser, Thomas G |
author_facet | Miller, Ryan Morillas, Jose A Sitaras, Joanne Bako, Jacob Neuner, Elizabeth A Gordon, Steven M Brizendine, Kyle D Fraser, Thomas G |
author_sort | Miller, Ryan |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: In an effort to optimize diagnostic testing for Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) our health system changed from stand-alone PCR testing to a “2-step” approach wherein all positive PCR results reflexed to an EIA. We report the effects of this change on publicly reported CDI metrics and treatment days of therapy (DOT). METHODS: The setting includes 10 Cleveland Clinic Health System hospitals in northeast Ohio and one in Florida. On June 12, 2018, 9 NE Ohio hospitals changed from PCR alone to PCR followed by EIA. Stand-alone PCR testing remained at one and GDH / EIA / PCR for discordant for another. Testing volumes were obtained from the microbiology laboratory. C. difficile LabID event SIRs were obtained from NHSN. Public reporting interpretative categories were identified based on SIR for second half of 2018. DOT for CDI agents were obtained from an antimicrobial stewardship database. RESULTS: Among hospitals that changed strategy the volume of PCR testing and the percent PCR + was similar between time periods. EIA positivity ranged from 23% to 53%. 4/11 hospitals improved their public reporting category: 3/9 that changed testing strategy and 1/2 that did not (Table 1). Two of 3 that changed strategy and improved public reporting also had a decrease in DOT. DOT increased in the 2 hospitals that did not change strategy. CONCLUSION: Six months after adopting a 2-step CDI testing strategy 7 of 9 hospitals had a lower SIR with 3 also demonstrating an improvement in public reporting category favorably impacting reputational and reimbursement risk for our healthcare system. CDI agent DOT was similar before and after the change. The impact of choice of test on publicly reported metrics demonstrates the difficulty of utilizing a proxy for hospital onset CDI, the CDI LabID event, as a measure of quality of care provided. [Image: see text] DISCLOSURES: All authors: No reported disclosures. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6810230 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-68102302019-10-28 2373. Impact of a Change in Testing Strategy for Clostridioides difficile Infection on a Publicly Reported Metric and Treatment Days of Therapy Miller, Ryan Morillas, Jose A Sitaras, Joanne Bako, Jacob Neuner, Elizabeth A Gordon, Steven M Brizendine, Kyle D Fraser, Thomas G Open Forum Infect Dis Abstracts BACKGROUND: In an effort to optimize diagnostic testing for Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) our health system changed from stand-alone PCR testing to a “2-step” approach wherein all positive PCR results reflexed to an EIA. We report the effects of this change on publicly reported CDI metrics and treatment days of therapy (DOT). METHODS: The setting includes 10 Cleveland Clinic Health System hospitals in northeast Ohio and one in Florida. On June 12, 2018, 9 NE Ohio hospitals changed from PCR alone to PCR followed by EIA. Stand-alone PCR testing remained at one and GDH / EIA / PCR for discordant for another. Testing volumes were obtained from the microbiology laboratory. C. difficile LabID event SIRs were obtained from NHSN. Public reporting interpretative categories were identified based on SIR for second half of 2018. DOT for CDI agents were obtained from an antimicrobial stewardship database. RESULTS: Among hospitals that changed strategy the volume of PCR testing and the percent PCR + was similar between time periods. EIA positivity ranged from 23% to 53%. 4/11 hospitals improved their public reporting category: 3/9 that changed testing strategy and 1/2 that did not (Table 1). Two of 3 that changed strategy and improved public reporting also had a decrease in DOT. DOT increased in the 2 hospitals that did not change strategy. CONCLUSION: Six months after adopting a 2-step CDI testing strategy 7 of 9 hospitals had a lower SIR with 3 also demonstrating an improvement in public reporting category favorably impacting reputational and reimbursement risk for our healthcare system. CDI agent DOT was similar before and after the change. The impact of choice of test on publicly reported metrics demonstrates the difficulty of utilizing a proxy for hospital onset CDI, the CDI LabID event, as a measure of quality of care provided. [Image: see text] DISCLOSURES: All authors: No reported disclosures. Oxford University Press 2019-10-23 /pmc/articles/PMC6810230/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofz360.2051 Text en © The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial reproduction and distribution of the work, in any medium, provided the original work is not altered or transformed in any way, and that the work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com |
spellingShingle | Abstracts Miller, Ryan Morillas, Jose A Sitaras, Joanne Bako, Jacob Neuner, Elizabeth A Gordon, Steven M Brizendine, Kyle D Fraser, Thomas G 2373. Impact of a Change in Testing Strategy for Clostridioides difficile Infection on a Publicly Reported Metric and Treatment Days of Therapy |
title | 2373. Impact of a Change in Testing Strategy for Clostridioides difficile Infection on a Publicly Reported Metric and Treatment Days of Therapy |
title_full | 2373. Impact of a Change in Testing Strategy for Clostridioides difficile Infection on a Publicly Reported Metric and Treatment Days of Therapy |
title_fullStr | 2373. Impact of a Change in Testing Strategy for Clostridioides difficile Infection on a Publicly Reported Metric and Treatment Days of Therapy |
title_full_unstemmed | 2373. Impact of a Change in Testing Strategy for Clostridioides difficile Infection on a Publicly Reported Metric and Treatment Days of Therapy |
title_short | 2373. Impact of a Change in Testing Strategy for Clostridioides difficile Infection on a Publicly Reported Metric and Treatment Days of Therapy |
title_sort | 2373. impact of a change in testing strategy for clostridioides difficile infection on a publicly reported metric and treatment days of therapy |
topic | Abstracts |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6810230/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofz360.2051 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT millerryan 2373impactofachangeintestingstrategyforclostridioidesdifficileinfectiononapubliclyreportedmetricandtreatmentdaysoftherapy AT morillasjosea 2373impactofachangeintestingstrategyforclostridioidesdifficileinfectiononapubliclyreportedmetricandtreatmentdaysoftherapy AT sitarasjoanne 2373impactofachangeintestingstrategyforclostridioidesdifficileinfectiononapubliclyreportedmetricandtreatmentdaysoftherapy AT bakojacob 2373impactofachangeintestingstrategyforclostridioidesdifficileinfectiononapubliclyreportedmetricandtreatmentdaysoftherapy AT neunerelizabetha 2373impactofachangeintestingstrategyforclostridioidesdifficileinfectiononapubliclyreportedmetricandtreatmentdaysoftherapy AT gordonstevenm 2373impactofachangeintestingstrategyforclostridioidesdifficileinfectiononapubliclyreportedmetricandtreatmentdaysoftherapy AT brizendinekyled 2373impactofachangeintestingstrategyforclostridioidesdifficileinfectiononapubliclyreportedmetricandtreatmentdaysoftherapy AT fraserthomasg 2373impactofachangeintestingstrategyforclostridioidesdifficileinfectiononapubliclyreportedmetricandtreatmentdaysoftherapy |