Cargando…

2412. Oral Vancomycin Prophylaxis Against Recurrent Clostridioides difficile Infection: Efficacy and Side-effects: Two Hospitals Experience

BACKGROUND: Clostridioides difficile is the most common hospital-acquired pathogen with an unchanged infection prevalence between 2011–2015. The data regarding the effectiveness of chemical prophylaxis to prevent recurrent C. difficile infection (CDI) are conflicting. METHODS: We conducted a retrosp...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zacharioudakis, Ioannis, Zervou, Fainareti, Dubrovskaya, Yanina, Phillips, Michael
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6810335/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofz360.2090
_version_ 1783462226021056512
author Zacharioudakis, Ioannis
Zervou, Fainareti
Dubrovskaya, Yanina
Phillips, Michael
author_facet Zacharioudakis, Ioannis
Zervou, Fainareti
Dubrovskaya, Yanina
Phillips, Michael
author_sort Zacharioudakis, Ioannis
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Clostridioides difficile is the most common hospital-acquired pathogen with an unchanged infection prevalence between 2011–2015. The data regarding the effectiveness of chemical prophylaxis to prevent recurrent C. difficile infection (CDI) are conflicting. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective study of hospitalized patients with CDI history in 2 New York academic hospitals over a 4.5-year period to determine the effectiveness of vancomycin prophylaxis for CDI prevention. The participating hospitals implemented an automated alert to providers recommending oral vancomycin 125 mg twice daily in patients with a history of CDI scheduled to receive any systemic antimicrobials for the duration of therapy and 5 days thereafter. Measured outcomes included the rate of breakthrough and recurrent CDI, defined as CDI during and in the one-month following prophylaxis, respectively. A self-controlled, before and after study design was employed to examine whether the use of oral vancomycin was associated with an increase in the prevalence of vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus species (VRE) both in absolute numbers and in comparison to vancomycin-sensitive Enterococcus species (VSE) in the period following vancomycin prophylaxis. RESULTS: 264 patients were included in the final analysis. Breakthrough CDI was identified in 17 (6.4%; 95% CIs 3.8%–10.1%) and recurrent CDI in 22 (8.3%; 95% CIs 5.3%–12.3%) patients. Of the 102 patients with a history of CDI within the 3 months preceding the administration of prophylaxis 4 (3.9%, 95% CIs 1.1%-9.7%) had breakthrough CDI and 9 had recurrent disease (8.3%, 95% CIs 5.3%–12.3%). In the 3 months following vancomycin prophylaxis there was an increase in both the absolute number of VRE and the ratio of VRE to VSE isolates compared with the combined period of 1.5 months preceding and the 3–4.5 months following the administration of prophylaxis. The increase in the absolute number of VRE colonized patients remained in the extended period of 6 months following prophylaxis. CONCLUSION: Prophylactic vancomycin is an effective strategy to prevent CDI recurrence, but is associated with an increase in VRE colonization in the immediate period after administration. The risk of VRE infection should lead to careful selection of patients at the highest risk for CDI recurrence. DISCLOSURES: All authors: No reported disclosures.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6810335
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-68103352019-10-28 2412. Oral Vancomycin Prophylaxis Against Recurrent Clostridioides difficile Infection: Efficacy and Side-effects: Two Hospitals Experience Zacharioudakis, Ioannis Zervou, Fainareti Dubrovskaya, Yanina Phillips, Michael Open Forum Infect Dis Abstracts BACKGROUND: Clostridioides difficile is the most common hospital-acquired pathogen with an unchanged infection prevalence between 2011–2015. The data regarding the effectiveness of chemical prophylaxis to prevent recurrent C. difficile infection (CDI) are conflicting. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective study of hospitalized patients with CDI history in 2 New York academic hospitals over a 4.5-year period to determine the effectiveness of vancomycin prophylaxis for CDI prevention. The participating hospitals implemented an automated alert to providers recommending oral vancomycin 125 mg twice daily in patients with a history of CDI scheduled to receive any systemic antimicrobials for the duration of therapy and 5 days thereafter. Measured outcomes included the rate of breakthrough and recurrent CDI, defined as CDI during and in the one-month following prophylaxis, respectively. A self-controlled, before and after study design was employed to examine whether the use of oral vancomycin was associated with an increase in the prevalence of vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus species (VRE) both in absolute numbers and in comparison to vancomycin-sensitive Enterococcus species (VSE) in the period following vancomycin prophylaxis. RESULTS: 264 patients were included in the final analysis. Breakthrough CDI was identified in 17 (6.4%; 95% CIs 3.8%–10.1%) and recurrent CDI in 22 (8.3%; 95% CIs 5.3%–12.3%) patients. Of the 102 patients with a history of CDI within the 3 months preceding the administration of prophylaxis 4 (3.9%, 95% CIs 1.1%-9.7%) had breakthrough CDI and 9 had recurrent disease (8.3%, 95% CIs 5.3%–12.3%). In the 3 months following vancomycin prophylaxis there was an increase in both the absolute number of VRE and the ratio of VRE to VSE isolates compared with the combined period of 1.5 months preceding and the 3–4.5 months following the administration of prophylaxis. The increase in the absolute number of VRE colonized patients remained in the extended period of 6 months following prophylaxis. CONCLUSION: Prophylactic vancomycin is an effective strategy to prevent CDI recurrence, but is associated with an increase in VRE colonization in the immediate period after administration. The risk of VRE infection should lead to careful selection of patients at the highest risk for CDI recurrence. DISCLOSURES: All authors: No reported disclosures. Oxford University Press 2019-10-23 /pmc/articles/PMC6810335/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofz360.2090 Text en © The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial reproduction and distribution of the work, in any medium, provided the original work is not altered or transformed in any way, and that the work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Abstracts
Zacharioudakis, Ioannis
Zervou, Fainareti
Dubrovskaya, Yanina
Phillips, Michael
2412. Oral Vancomycin Prophylaxis Against Recurrent Clostridioides difficile Infection: Efficacy and Side-effects: Two Hospitals Experience
title 2412. Oral Vancomycin Prophylaxis Against Recurrent Clostridioides difficile Infection: Efficacy and Side-effects: Two Hospitals Experience
title_full 2412. Oral Vancomycin Prophylaxis Against Recurrent Clostridioides difficile Infection: Efficacy and Side-effects: Two Hospitals Experience
title_fullStr 2412. Oral Vancomycin Prophylaxis Against Recurrent Clostridioides difficile Infection: Efficacy and Side-effects: Two Hospitals Experience
title_full_unstemmed 2412. Oral Vancomycin Prophylaxis Against Recurrent Clostridioides difficile Infection: Efficacy and Side-effects: Two Hospitals Experience
title_short 2412. Oral Vancomycin Prophylaxis Against Recurrent Clostridioides difficile Infection: Efficacy and Side-effects: Two Hospitals Experience
title_sort 2412. oral vancomycin prophylaxis against recurrent clostridioides difficile infection: efficacy and side-effects: two hospitals experience
topic Abstracts
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6810335/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofz360.2090
work_keys_str_mv AT zacharioudakisioannis 2412oralvancomycinprophylaxisagainstrecurrentclostridioidesdifficileinfectionefficacyandsideeffectstwohospitalsexperience
AT zervoufainareti 2412oralvancomycinprophylaxisagainstrecurrentclostridioidesdifficileinfectionefficacyandsideeffectstwohospitalsexperience
AT dubrovskayayanina 2412oralvancomycinprophylaxisagainstrecurrentclostridioidesdifficileinfectionefficacyandsideeffectstwohospitalsexperience
AT phillipsmichael 2412oralvancomycinprophylaxisagainstrecurrentclostridioidesdifficileinfectionefficacyandsideeffectstwohospitalsexperience