Cargando…
2412. Oral Vancomycin Prophylaxis Against Recurrent Clostridioides difficile Infection: Efficacy and Side-effects: Two Hospitals Experience
BACKGROUND: Clostridioides difficile is the most common hospital-acquired pathogen with an unchanged infection prevalence between 2011–2015. The data regarding the effectiveness of chemical prophylaxis to prevent recurrent C. difficile infection (CDI) are conflicting. METHODS: We conducted a retrosp...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6810335/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofz360.2090 |
_version_ | 1783462226021056512 |
---|---|
author | Zacharioudakis, Ioannis Zervou, Fainareti Dubrovskaya, Yanina Phillips, Michael |
author_facet | Zacharioudakis, Ioannis Zervou, Fainareti Dubrovskaya, Yanina Phillips, Michael |
author_sort | Zacharioudakis, Ioannis |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Clostridioides difficile is the most common hospital-acquired pathogen with an unchanged infection prevalence between 2011–2015. The data regarding the effectiveness of chemical prophylaxis to prevent recurrent C. difficile infection (CDI) are conflicting. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective study of hospitalized patients with CDI history in 2 New York academic hospitals over a 4.5-year period to determine the effectiveness of vancomycin prophylaxis for CDI prevention. The participating hospitals implemented an automated alert to providers recommending oral vancomycin 125 mg twice daily in patients with a history of CDI scheduled to receive any systemic antimicrobials for the duration of therapy and 5 days thereafter. Measured outcomes included the rate of breakthrough and recurrent CDI, defined as CDI during and in the one-month following prophylaxis, respectively. A self-controlled, before and after study design was employed to examine whether the use of oral vancomycin was associated with an increase in the prevalence of vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus species (VRE) both in absolute numbers and in comparison to vancomycin-sensitive Enterococcus species (VSE) in the period following vancomycin prophylaxis. RESULTS: 264 patients were included in the final analysis. Breakthrough CDI was identified in 17 (6.4%; 95% CIs 3.8%–10.1%) and recurrent CDI in 22 (8.3%; 95% CIs 5.3%–12.3%) patients. Of the 102 patients with a history of CDI within the 3 months preceding the administration of prophylaxis 4 (3.9%, 95% CIs 1.1%-9.7%) had breakthrough CDI and 9 had recurrent disease (8.3%, 95% CIs 5.3%–12.3%). In the 3 months following vancomycin prophylaxis there was an increase in both the absolute number of VRE and the ratio of VRE to VSE isolates compared with the combined period of 1.5 months preceding and the 3–4.5 months following the administration of prophylaxis. The increase in the absolute number of VRE colonized patients remained in the extended period of 6 months following prophylaxis. CONCLUSION: Prophylactic vancomycin is an effective strategy to prevent CDI recurrence, but is associated with an increase in VRE colonization in the immediate period after administration. The risk of VRE infection should lead to careful selection of patients at the highest risk for CDI recurrence. DISCLOSURES: All authors: No reported disclosures. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6810335 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-68103352019-10-28 2412. Oral Vancomycin Prophylaxis Against Recurrent Clostridioides difficile Infection: Efficacy and Side-effects: Two Hospitals Experience Zacharioudakis, Ioannis Zervou, Fainareti Dubrovskaya, Yanina Phillips, Michael Open Forum Infect Dis Abstracts BACKGROUND: Clostridioides difficile is the most common hospital-acquired pathogen with an unchanged infection prevalence between 2011–2015. The data regarding the effectiveness of chemical prophylaxis to prevent recurrent C. difficile infection (CDI) are conflicting. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective study of hospitalized patients with CDI history in 2 New York academic hospitals over a 4.5-year period to determine the effectiveness of vancomycin prophylaxis for CDI prevention. The participating hospitals implemented an automated alert to providers recommending oral vancomycin 125 mg twice daily in patients with a history of CDI scheduled to receive any systemic antimicrobials for the duration of therapy and 5 days thereafter. Measured outcomes included the rate of breakthrough and recurrent CDI, defined as CDI during and in the one-month following prophylaxis, respectively. A self-controlled, before and after study design was employed to examine whether the use of oral vancomycin was associated with an increase in the prevalence of vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus species (VRE) both in absolute numbers and in comparison to vancomycin-sensitive Enterococcus species (VSE) in the period following vancomycin prophylaxis. RESULTS: 264 patients were included in the final analysis. Breakthrough CDI was identified in 17 (6.4%; 95% CIs 3.8%–10.1%) and recurrent CDI in 22 (8.3%; 95% CIs 5.3%–12.3%) patients. Of the 102 patients with a history of CDI within the 3 months preceding the administration of prophylaxis 4 (3.9%, 95% CIs 1.1%-9.7%) had breakthrough CDI and 9 had recurrent disease (8.3%, 95% CIs 5.3%–12.3%). In the 3 months following vancomycin prophylaxis there was an increase in both the absolute number of VRE and the ratio of VRE to VSE isolates compared with the combined period of 1.5 months preceding and the 3–4.5 months following the administration of prophylaxis. The increase in the absolute number of VRE colonized patients remained in the extended period of 6 months following prophylaxis. CONCLUSION: Prophylactic vancomycin is an effective strategy to prevent CDI recurrence, but is associated with an increase in VRE colonization in the immediate period after administration. The risk of VRE infection should lead to careful selection of patients at the highest risk for CDI recurrence. DISCLOSURES: All authors: No reported disclosures. Oxford University Press 2019-10-23 /pmc/articles/PMC6810335/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofz360.2090 Text en © The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial reproduction and distribution of the work, in any medium, provided the original work is not altered or transformed in any way, and that the work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com |
spellingShingle | Abstracts Zacharioudakis, Ioannis Zervou, Fainareti Dubrovskaya, Yanina Phillips, Michael 2412. Oral Vancomycin Prophylaxis Against Recurrent Clostridioides difficile Infection: Efficacy and Side-effects: Two Hospitals Experience |
title | 2412. Oral Vancomycin Prophylaxis Against Recurrent Clostridioides difficile Infection: Efficacy and Side-effects: Two Hospitals Experience |
title_full | 2412. Oral Vancomycin Prophylaxis Against Recurrent Clostridioides difficile Infection: Efficacy and Side-effects: Two Hospitals Experience |
title_fullStr | 2412. Oral Vancomycin Prophylaxis Against Recurrent Clostridioides difficile Infection: Efficacy and Side-effects: Two Hospitals Experience |
title_full_unstemmed | 2412. Oral Vancomycin Prophylaxis Against Recurrent Clostridioides difficile Infection: Efficacy and Side-effects: Two Hospitals Experience |
title_short | 2412. Oral Vancomycin Prophylaxis Against Recurrent Clostridioides difficile Infection: Efficacy and Side-effects: Two Hospitals Experience |
title_sort | 2412. oral vancomycin prophylaxis against recurrent clostridioides difficile infection: efficacy and side-effects: two hospitals experience |
topic | Abstracts |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6810335/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofz360.2090 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT zacharioudakisioannis 2412oralvancomycinprophylaxisagainstrecurrentclostridioidesdifficileinfectionefficacyandsideeffectstwohospitalsexperience AT zervoufainareti 2412oralvancomycinprophylaxisagainstrecurrentclostridioidesdifficileinfectionefficacyandsideeffectstwohospitalsexperience AT dubrovskayayanina 2412oralvancomycinprophylaxisagainstrecurrentclostridioidesdifficileinfectionefficacyandsideeffectstwohospitalsexperience AT phillipsmichael 2412oralvancomycinprophylaxisagainstrecurrentclostridioidesdifficileinfectionefficacyandsideeffectstwohospitalsexperience |