Cargando…
2226. Impact of Prior and Concomitant Antibacterial Therapy on Outcomes in the ASPECT-NP Randomized, Controlled Trial of Ceftolozane/Tazobactam (C/T) vs. Meropenem (MEM) in Patients with Ventilated Nosocomial Pneumonia (NP)
BACKGROUND: NP is a frequent healthcare-acquired infection associated with high mortality; rising resistance rates among causative Gram-negative pathogens require new treatment options. In the randomized, controlled, double-blind, phase 3 ASPECT-NP trial, C/T (at double the initially approved dose)...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6810350/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofz360.1904 |
_version_ | 1783462230637936640 |
---|---|
author | Wunderink, Richard G Bruno, Christopher Martin-Loeches, Ignacio Kollef, Marin Timsit, Jean-Francois Yu, Brian Huntington, Jennifer A Li, Linping Jensen, Erin Wolf, Dominik Butterton, Joan R Rhee, Elizabeth G |
author_facet | Wunderink, Richard G Bruno, Christopher Martin-Loeches, Ignacio Kollef, Marin Timsit, Jean-Francois Yu, Brian Huntington, Jennifer A Li, Linping Jensen, Erin Wolf, Dominik Butterton, Joan R Rhee, Elizabeth G |
author_sort | Wunderink, Richard G |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: NP is a frequent healthcare-acquired infection associated with high mortality; rising resistance rates among causative Gram-negative pathogens require new treatment options. In the randomized, controlled, double-blind, phase 3 ASPECT-NP trial, C/T (at double the initially approved dose) was noninferior to MEM for ventilated NP in both primary and key secondary endpoints. Here we evaluate the impact of prior and concomitant Gram-negative antibacterial therapy on outcomes in that trial. METHODS: Mechanically ventilated patients with ventilator-associated or hospital-acquired pneumonia were randomized 1:1 to 3 g C/T or 1 g MEM, both by 1-h IV infusion every 8 hours for 8–14 days. Patients could receive ≤24 hours of active antibacterial therapy within ≤72 hours prior to first dose; longer durations were permitted in case of prior treatment failure (i.e., signs and/or symptoms of the current episode of ventilated NP persisted/worsened despite ≥48 hours of treatment). At sites with MEM-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa rates ≥15%, patients could optionally receive up to 72 h of adjunctive empiric aminoglycoside (amikacin was recommended) until study drug susceptibility was confirmed. Primary and key secondary endpoints, respectively, were 28-d all-cause mortality and clinical response at test of cure (TOC; 7–14 days after the end of therapy) in the intent to treat (ITT) population (all randomized patients). RESULTS: In the C/T arm, 285/362 (79%) ITT patients received prior systemic Gram-negative therapy and 103/362 (28%) received adjunctive aminoglycoside, compared with 288/364 (79%) and 112/364 (31%) patients, respectively, in the MEM arm. In the microbiologic ITT population, causative pathogens in patients failing prior therapy at the time of enrollment (C/T 15%, MEM 11%) were mainly Klebsiella spp (33%), P. aeruginosa (17%), Escherichia coli (14%), and Acinetobacter baumannii (8%). Mortality and cure rates were comparable between C/T and MEM regardless of receipt of prior systemic or adjunctive Gram-negative therapy (table). CONCLUSION: Prior and adjunctive Gram-negative antibacterial therapy did not affect the relative efficacy of C/T (at the 3-g dose) vs. MEM in these high-risk patients with Gram-negative ventilated NP. [Image: see text] DISCLOSURES: All authors: No reported disclosures. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6810350 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-68103502019-10-28 2226. Impact of Prior and Concomitant Antibacterial Therapy on Outcomes in the ASPECT-NP Randomized, Controlled Trial of Ceftolozane/Tazobactam (C/T) vs. Meropenem (MEM) in Patients with Ventilated Nosocomial Pneumonia (NP) Wunderink, Richard G Bruno, Christopher Martin-Loeches, Ignacio Kollef, Marin Timsit, Jean-Francois Yu, Brian Huntington, Jennifer A Li, Linping Jensen, Erin Wolf, Dominik Butterton, Joan R Rhee, Elizabeth G Open Forum Infect Dis Abstracts BACKGROUND: NP is a frequent healthcare-acquired infection associated with high mortality; rising resistance rates among causative Gram-negative pathogens require new treatment options. In the randomized, controlled, double-blind, phase 3 ASPECT-NP trial, C/T (at double the initially approved dose) was noninferior to MEM for ventilated NP in both primary and key secondary endpoints. Here we evaluate the impact of prior and concomitant Gram-negative antibacterial therapy on outcomes in that trial. METHODS: Mechanically ventilated patients with ventilator-associated or hospital-acquired pneumonia were randomized 1:1 to 3 g C/T or 1 g MEM, both by 1-h IV infusion every 8 hours for 8–14 days. Patients could receive ≤24 hours of active antibacterial therapy within ≤72 hours prior to first dose; longer durations were permitted in case of prior treatment failure (i.e., signs and/or symptoms of the current episode of ventilated NP persisted/worsened despite ≥48 hours of treatment). At sites with MEM-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa rates ≥15%, patients could optionally receive up to 72 h of adjunctive empiric aminoglycoside (amikacin was recommended) until study drug susceptibility was confirmed. Primary and key secondary endpoints, respectively, were 28-d all-cause mortality and clinical response at test of cure (TOC; 7–14 days after the end of therapy) in the intent to treat (ITT) population (all randomized patients). RESULTS: In the C/T arm, 285/362 (79%) ITT patients received prior systemic Gram-negative therapy and 103/362 (28%) received adjunctive aminoglycoside, compared with 288/364 (79%) and 112/364 (31%) patients, respectively, in the MEM arm. In the microbiologic ITT population, causative pathogens in patients failing prior therapy at the time of enrollment (C/T 15%, MEM 11%) were mainly Klebsiella spp (33%), P. aeruginosa (17%), Escherichia coli (14%), and Acinetobacter baumannii (8%). Mortality and cure rates were comparable between C/T and MEM regardless of receipt of prior systemic or adjunctive Gram-negative therapy (table). CONCLUSION: Prior and adjunctive Gram-negative antibacterial therapy did not affect the relative efficacy of C/T (at the 3-g dose) vs. MEM in these high-risk patients with Gram-negative ventilated NP. [Image: see text] DISCLOSURES: All authors: No reported disclosures. Oxford University Press 2019-10-23 /pmc/articles/PMC6810350/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofz360.1904 Text en © The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial reproduction and distribution of the work, in any medium, provided the original work is not altered or transformed in any way, and that the work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com |
spellingShingle | Abstracts Wunderink, Richard G Bruno, Christopher Martin-Loeches, Ignacio Kollef, Marin Timsit, Jean-Francois Yu, Brian Huntington, Jennifer A Li, Linping Jensen, Erin Wolf, Dominik Butterton, Joan R Rhee, Elizabeth G 2226. Impact of Prior and Concomitant Antibacterial Therapy on Outcomes in the ASPECT-NP Randomized, Controlled Trial of Ceftolozane/Tazobactam (C/T) vs. Meropenem (MEM) in Patients with Ventilated Nosocomial Pneumonia (NP) |
title | 2226. Impact of Prior and Concomitant Antibacterial Therapy on Outcomes in the ASPECT-NP Randomized, Controlled Trial of Ceftolozane/Tazobactam (C/T) vs. Meropenem (MEM) in Patients with Ventilated Nosocomial Pneumonia (NP) |
title_full | 2226. Impact of Prior and Concomitant Antibacterial Therapy on Outcomes in the ASPECT-NP Randomized, Controlled Trial of Ceftolozane/Tazobactam (C/T) vs. Meropenem (MEM) in Patients with Ventilated Nosocomial Pneumonia (NP) |
title_fullStr | 2226. Impact of Prior and Concomitant Antibacterial Therapy on Outcomes in the ASPECT-NP Randomized, Controlled Trial of Ceftolozane/Tazobactam (C/T) vs. Meropenem (MEM) in Patients with Ventilated Nosocomial Pneumonia (NP) |
title_full_unstemmed | 2226. Impact of Prior and Concomitant Antibacterial Therapy on Outcomes in the ASPECT-NP Randomized, Controlled Trial of Ceftolozane/Tazobactam (C/T) vs. Meropenem (MEM) in Patients with Ventilated Nosocomial Pneumonia (NP) |
title_short | 2226. Impact of Prior and Concomitant Antibacterial Therapy on Outcomes in the ASPECT-NP Randomized, Controlled Trial of Ceftolozane/Tazobactam (C/T) vs. Meropenem (MEM) in Patients with Ventilated Nosocomial Pneumonia (NP) |
title_sort | 2226. impact of prior and concomitant antibacterial therapy on outcomes in the aspect-np randomized, controlled trial of ceftolozane/tazobactam (c/t) vs. meropenem (mem) in patients with ventilated nosocomial pneumonia (np) |
topic | Abstracts |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6810350/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofz360.1904 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT wunderinkrichardg 2226impactofpriorandconcomitantantibacterialtherapyonoutcomesintheaspectnprandomizedcontrolledtrialofceftolozanetazobactamctvsmeropenemmeminpatientswithventilatednosocomialpneumonianp AT brunochristopher 2226impactofpriorandconcomitantantibacterialtherapyonoutcomesintheaspectnprandomizedcontrolledtrialofceftolozanetazobactamctvsmeropenemmeminpatientswithventilatednosocomialpneumonianp AT martinloechesignacio 2226impactofpriorandconcomitantantibacterialtherapyonoutcomesintheaspectnprandomizedcontrolledtrialofceftolozanetazobactamctvsmeropenemmeminpatientswithventilatednosocomialpneumonianp AT kollefmarin 2226impactofpriorandconcomitantantibacterialtherapyonoutcomesintheaspectnprandomizedcontrolledtrialofceftolozanetazobactamctvsmeropenemmeminpatientswithventilatednosocomialpneumonianp AT timsitjeanfrancois 2226impactofpriorandconcomitantantibacterialtherapyonoutcomesintheaspectnprandomizedcontrolledtrialofceftolozanetazobactamctvsmeropenemmeminpatientswithventilatednosocomialpneumonianp AT yubrian 2226impactofpriorandconcomitantantibacterialtherapyonoutcomesintheaspectnprandomizedcontrolledtrialofceftolozanetazobactamctvsmeropenemmeminpatientswithventilatednosocomialpneumonianp AT huntingtonjennifera 2226impactofpriorandconcomitantantibacterialtherapyonoutcomesintheaspectnprandomizedcontrolledtrialofceftolozanetazobactamctvsmeropenemmeminpatientswithventilatednosocomialpneumonianp AT lilinping 2226impactofpriorandconcomitantantibacterialtherapyonoutcomesintheaspectnprandomizedcontrolledtrialofceftolozanetazobactamctvsmeropenemmeminpatientswithventilatednosocomialpneumonianp AT jensenerin 2226impactofpriorandconcomitantantibacterialtherapyonoutcomesintheaspectnprandomizedcontrolledtrialofceftolozanetazobactamctvsmeropenemmeminpatientswithventilatednosocomialpneumonianp AT wolfdominik 2226impactofpriorandconcomitantantibacterialtherapyonoutcomesintheaspectnprandomizedcontrolledtrialofceftolozanetazobactamctvsmeropenemmeminpatientswithventilatednosocomialpneumonianp AT buttertonjoanr 2226impactofpriorandconcomitantantibacterialtherapyonoutcomesintheaspectnprandomizedcontrolledtrialofceftolozanetazobactamctvsmeropenemmeminpatientswithventilatednosocomialpneumonianp AT rheeelizabethg 2226impactofpriorandconcomitantantibacterialtherapyonoutcomesintheaspectnprandomizedcontrolledtrialofceftolozanetazobactamctvsmeropenemmeminpatientswithventilatednosocomialpneumonianp |