Cargando…
2087. Electronic Capture and Feedback of Standardized Antibiotic Clinical Indications Data Among Community Hospitals
BACKGROUND: Antibiotic clinical indications allow stewardship programs to assess therapy appropriateness; however, many hospitals that require antibiotic indications upon order entry lack standardized mapping of indications leading to variability in entered values. Electronic capture and feedback of...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6810370/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofz360.1767 |
_version_ | 1783462235943731200 |
---|---|
author | Dyer, April Davis, Angelina Gregory, Eric Johnson, Melissa D Jones, Travis M Moehring, Rebekah W Dodds Ashley, Elizabeth |
author_facet | Dyer, April Davis, Angelina Gregory, Eric Johnson, Melissa D Jones, Travis M Moehring, Rebekah W Dodds Ashley, Elizabeth |
author_sort | Dyer, April |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Antibiotic clinical indications allow stewardship programs to assess therapy appropriateness; however, many hospitals that require antibiotic indications upon order entry lack standardized mapping of indications leading to variability in entered values. Electronic capture and feedback of standardized antibiotic clinical indications data may allow hospitals to more effectively compare indication-specific prescribing trends among facilities. METHODS: We collected antibiotic indications from electronic medication orders for 6 DASON hospitals. These indications were mapped to a list of 15 standardized indication categories created by consensus of the DASON stewardship team. To demonstrate the feasibility and utility of standardized clinical indications mapping, we evaluated agents given for the indication C. difficile infection (CDI) in 2018. Differences between the hospitals were compared with highlight the added benefit of standardized indication data in evaluating antibiotic use and adoption of local guidelines. RESULTS: For 249,916 antibiotic days of therapy (DOT) with an indication available, a total of 125 unique indications were reported. Of note, 3 facilities allowed more than one indication to be entered at prescriber discretion. The distribution of antibiotic DOT mapped to the standardized indication list can be seen in Figure 1. The most common indication was the other category (19.5%). These were primarily other, no additional information (47%) or empiric therapy for an unknown source of infection (17%). Additional indications in the other category included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease exacerbations and sexually transmitted infections (< 5% each). Figure 2 depicts the agents used for CDI indication between facilities. Despite universal adoption of local guidelines where oral vancomycin is the drug of choice for treating CDI, there was variability seen in vancomycin CDI DOT (range: 60 – 80% of CDI DOT). CONCLUSION: Stewardship programs can implement standardized antimicrobial indications to facilitate electronic capture, feedback, and comparison and efficiently identify stewardship targets. Additionally, hospitals may use these data to explore the appropriateness of antibiotic use. [Image: see text] [Image: see text] DISCLOSURES: All authors: No reported disclosures. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6810370 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-68103702019-10-28 2087. Electronic Capture and Feedback of Standardized Antibiotic Clinical Indications Data Among Community Hospitals Dyer, April Davis, Angelina Gregory, Eric Johnson, Melissa D Jones, Travis M Moehring, Rebekah W Dodds Ashley, Elizabeth Open Forum Infect Dis Abstracts BACKGROUND: Antibiotic clinical indications allow stewardship programs to assess therapy appropriateness; however, many hospitals that require antibiotic indications upon order entry lack standardized mapping of indications leading to variability in entered values. Electronic capture and feedback of standardized antibiotic clinical indications data may allow hospitals to more effectively compare indication-specific prescribing trends among facilities. METHODS: We collected antibiotic indications from electronic medication orders for 6 DASON hospitals. These indications were mapped to a list of 15 standardized indication categories created by consensus of the DASON stewardship team. To demonstrate the feasibility and utility of standardized clinical indications mapping, we evaluated agents given for the indication C. difficile infection (CDI) in 2018. Differences between the hospitals were compared with highlight the added benefit of standardized indication data in evaluating antibiotic use and adoption of local guidelines. RESULTS: For 249,916 antibiotic days of therapy (DOT) with an indication available, a total of 125 unique indications were reported. Of note, 3 facilities allowed more than one indication to be entered at prescriber discretion. The distribution of antibiotic DOT mapped to the standardized indication list can be seen in Figure 1. The most common indication was the other category (19.5%). These were primarily other, no additional information (47%) or empiric therapy for an unknown source of infection (17%). Additional indications in the other category included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease exacerbations and sexually transmitted infections (< 5% each). Figure 2 depicts the agents used for CDI indication between facilities. Despite universal adoption of local guidelines where oral vancomycin is the drug of choice for treating CDI, there was variability seen in vancomycin CDI DOT (range: 60 – 80% of CDI DOT). CONCLUSION: Stewardship programs can implement standardized antimicrobial indications to facilitate electronic capture, feedback, and comparison and efficiently identify stewardship targets. Additionally, hospitals may use these data to explore the appropriateness of antibiotic use. [Image: see text] [Image: see text] DISCLOSURES: All authors: No reported disclosures. Oxford University Press 2019-10-23 /pmc/articles/PMC6810370/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofz360.1767 Text en © The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial reproduction and distribution of the work, in any medium, provided the original work is not altered or transformed in any way, and that the work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com |
spellingShingle | Abstracts Dyer, April Davis, Angelina Gregory, Eric Johnson, Melissa D Jones, Travis M Moehring, Rebekah W Dodds Ashley, Elizabeth 2087. Electronic Capture and Feedback of Standardized Antibiotic Clinical Indications Data Among Community Hospitals |
title | 2087. Electronic Capture and Feedback of Standardized Antibiotic Clinical Indications Data Among Community Hospitals |
title_full | 2087. Electronic Capture and Feedback of Standardized Antibiotic Clinical Indications Data Among Community Hospitals |
title_fullStr | 2087. Electronic Capture and Feedback of Standardized Antibiotic Clinical Indications Data Among Community Hospitals |
title_full_unstemmed | 2087. Electronic Capture and Feedback of Standardized Antibiotic Clinical Indications Data Among Community Hospitals |
title_short | 2087. Electronic Capture and Feedback of Standardized Antibiotic Clinical Indications Data Among Community Hospitals |
title_sort | 2087. electronic capture and feedback of standardized antibiotic clinical indications data among community hospitals |
topic | Abstracts |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6810370/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofz360.1767 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT dyerapril 2087electroniccaptureandfeedbackofstandardizedantibioticclinicalindicationsdataamongcommunityhospitals AT davisangelina 2087electroniccaptureandfeedbackofstandardizedantibioticclinicalindicationsdataamongcommunityhospitals AT gregoryeric 2087electroniccaptureandfeedbackofstandardizedantibioticclinicalindicationsdataamongcommunityhospitals AT johnsonmelissad 2087electroniccaptureandfeedbackofstandardizedantibioticclinicalindicationsdataamongcommunityhospitals AT jonestravism 2087electroniccaptureandfeedbackofstandardizedantibioticclinicalindicationsdataamongcommunityhospitals AT moehringrebekahw 2087electroniccaptureandfeedbackofstandardizedantibioticclinicalindicationsdataamongcommunityhospitals AT doddsashleyelizabeth 2087electroniccaptureandfeedbackofstandardizedantibioticclinicalindicationsdataamongcommunityhospitals |