Cargando…

2087. Electronic Capture and Feedback of Standardized Antibiotic Clinical Indications Data Among Community Hospitals

BACKGROUND: Antibiotic clinical indications allow stewardship programs to assess therapy appropriateness; however, many hospitals that require antibiotic indications upon order entry lack standardized mapping of indications leading to variability in entered values. Electronic capture and feedback of...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Dyer, April, Davis, Angelina, Gregory, Eric, Johnson, Melissa D, Jones, Travis M, Moehring, Rebekah W, Dodds Ashley, Elizabeth
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6810370/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofz360.1767
_version_ 1783462235943731200
author Dyer, April
Davis, Angelina
Gregory, Eric
Johnson, Melissa D
Jones, Travis M
Moehring, Rebekah W
Dodds Ashley, Elizabeth
author_facet Dyer, April
Davis, Angelina
Gregory, Eric
Johnson, Melissa D
Jones, Travis M
Moehring, Rebekah W
Dodds Ashley, Elizabeth
author_sort Dyer, April
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Antibiotic clinical indications allow stewardship programs to assess therapy appropriateness; however, many hospitals that require antibiotic indications upon order entry lack standardized mapping of indications leading to variability in entered values. Electronic capture and feedback of standardized antibiotic clinical indications data may allow hospitals to more effectively compare indication-specific prescribing trends among facilities. METHODS: We collected antibiotic indications from electronic medication orders for 6 DASON hospitals. These indications were mapped to a list of 15 standardized indication categories created by consensus of the DASON stewardship team. To demonstrate the feasibility and utility of standardized clinical indications mapping, we evaluated agents given for the indication C. difficile infection (CDI) in 2018. Differences between the hospitals were compared with highlight the added benefit of standardized indication data in evaluating antibiotic use and adoption of local guidelines. RESULTS: For 249,916 antibiotic days of therapy (DOT) with an indication available, a total of 125 unique indications were reported. Of note, 3 facilities allowed more than one indication to be entered at prescriber discretion. The distribution of antibiotic DOT mapped to the standardized indication list can be seen in Figure 1. The most common indication was the other category (19.5%). These were primarily other, no additional information (47%) or empiric therapy for an unknown source of infection (17%). Additional indications in the other category included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease exacerbations and sexually transmitted infections (< 5% each). Figure 2 depicts the agents used for CDI indication between facilities. Despite universal adoption of local guidelines where oral vancomycin is the drug of choice for treating CDI, there was variability seen in vancomycin CDI DOT (range: 60 – 80% of CDI DOT). CONCLUSION: Stewardship programs can implement standardized antimicrobial indications to facilitate electronic capture, feedback, and comparison and efficiently identify stewardship targets. Additionally, hospitals may use these data to explore the appropriateness of antibiotic use. [Image: see text] [Image: see text] DISCLOSURES: All authors: No reported disclosures.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6810370
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-68103702019-10-28 2087. Electronic Capture and Feedback of Standardized Antibiotic Clinical Indications Data Among Community Hospitals Dyer, April Davis, Angelina Gregory, Eric Johnson, Melissa D Jones, Travis M Moehring, Rebekah W Dodds Ashley, Elizabeth Open Forum Infect Dis Abstracts BACKGROUND: Antibiotic clinical indications allow stewardship programs to assess therapy appropriateness; however, many hospitals that require antibiotic indications upon order entry lack standardized mapping of indications leading to variability in entered values. Electronic capture and feedback of standardized antibiotic clinical indications data may allow hospitals to more effectively compare indication-specific prescribing trends among facilities. METHODS: We collected antibiotic indications from electronic medication orders for 6 DASON hospitals. These indications were mapped to a list of 15 standardized indication categories created by consensus of the DASON stewardship team. To demonstrate the feasibility and utility of standardized clinical indications mapping, we evaluated agents given for the indication C. difficile infection (CDI) in 2018. Differences between the hospitals were compared with highlight the added benefit of standardized indication data in evaluating antibiotic use and adoption of local guidelines. RESULTS: For 249,916 antibiotic days of therapy (DOT) with an indication available, a total of 125 unique indications were reported. Of note, 3 facilities allowed more than one indication to be entered at prescriber discretion. The distribution of antibiotic DOT mapped to the standardized indication list can be seen in Figure 1. The most common indication was the other category (19.5%). These were primarily other, no additional information (47%) or empiric therapy for an unknown source of infection (17%). Additional indications in the other category included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease exacerbations and sexually transmitted infections (< 5% each). Figure 2 depicts the agents used for CDI indication between facilities. Despite universal adoption of local guidelines where oral vancomycin is the drug of choice for treating CDI, there was variability seen in vancomycin CDI DOT (range: 60 – 80% of CDI DOT). CONCLUSION: Stewardship programs can implement standardized antimicrobial indications to facilitate electronic capture, feedback, and comparison and efficiently identify stewardship targets. Additionally, hospitals may use these data to explore the appropriateness of antibiotic use. [Image: see text] [Image: see text] DISCLOSURES: All authors: No reported disclosures. Oxford University Press 2019-10-23 /pmc/articles/PMC6810370/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofz360.1767 Text en © The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial reproduction and distribution of the work, in any medium, provided the original work is not altered or transformed in any way, and that the work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Abstracts
Dyer, April
Davis, Angelina
Gregory, Eric
Johnson, Melissa D
Jones, Travis M
Moehring, Rebekah W
Dodds Ashley, Elizabeth
2087. Electronic Capture and Feedback of Standardized Antibiotic Clinical Indications Data Among Community Hospitals
title 2087. Electronic Capture and Feedback of Standardized Antibiotic Clinical Indications Data Among Community Hospitals
title_full 2087. Electronic Capture and Feedback of Standardized Antibiotic Clinical Indications Data Among Community Hospitals
title_fullStr 2087. Electronic Capture and Feedback of Standardized Antibiotic Clinical Indications Data Among Community Hospitals
title_full_unstemmed 2087. Electronic Capture and Feedback of Standardized Antibiotic Clinical Indications Data Among Community Hospitals
title_short 2087. Electronic Capture and Feedback of Standardized Antibiotic Clinical Indications Data Among Community Hospitals
title_sort 2087. electronic capture and feedback of standardized antibiotic clinical indications data among community hospitals
topic Abstracts
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6810370/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofz360.1767
work_keys_str_mv AT dyerapril 2087electroniccaptureandfeedbackofstandardizedantibioticclinicalindicationsdataamongcommunityhospitals
AT davisangelina 2087electroniccaptureandfeedbackofstandardizedantibioticclinicalindicationsdataamongcommunityhospitals
AT gregoryeric 2087electroniccaptureandfeedbackofstandardizedantibioticclinicalindicationsdataamongcommunityhospitals
AT johnsonmelissad 2087electroniccaptureandfeedbackofstandardizedantibioticclinicalindicationsdataamongcommunityhospitals
AT jonestravism 2087electroniccaptureandfeedbackofstandardizedantibioticclinicalindicationsdataamongcommunityhospitals
AT moehringrebekahw 2087electroniccaptureandfeedbackofstandardizedantibioticclinicalindicationsdataamongcommunityhospitals
AT doddsashleyelizabeth 2087electroniccaptureandfeedbackofstandardizedantibioticclinicalindicationsdataamongcommunityhospitals