Cargando…

2537. #IDDailyPearl: A Twitter Tool to Enhance Literature Engagement on Busy Infectious Diseases Consult Services

BACKGROUND: Social media platforms enable on-demand, open-access learning which is attractive for busy clinicians and trainees. Additionally, teaching that occurs in a clinically contextualized, case-based setting in real time has the potential to be more effective than traditional didactics. We pil...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cowell, Annie N, Wooten, Darcy
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6810422/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofz360.2215
_version_ 1783462251194220544
author Cowell, Annie N
Wooten, Darcy
author_facet Cowell, Annie N
Wooten, Darcy
author_sort Cowell, Annie N
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Social media platforms enable on-demand, open-access learning which is attractive for busy clinicians and trainees. Additionally, teaching that occurs in a clinically contextualized, case-based setting in real time has the potential to be more effective than traditional didactics. We piloted a teaching tool to enhance learning and engagement with the literature for fellows on the infectious diseases (ID) consult service. METHODS: During a clinical service rotation, ID faculty posted a brief daily teaching point on Twitter under the hashtag “#IDDailyPearl” with a link to the relevant article. Tweets were required to be related to a patient case, associated with an article, and could not include patient identifiers. RESULTS: Over a 3-month period, there were 134 tweets that fit our criteria, with 103 tweets posted by UCSD faculty and 45 by faculty from other institutions. The most common topic was endocarditis and bacteremia (16.4%), followed by fungal infections (11%), tuberculosis (9.4%), and antimicrobials (9.4%) (Figure 1). Article types included review articles (21.6%), retrospective cohort studies (20.2%), case reports (13.5%), randomized controlled trials (12.1%), prospective cohort studies (9.4%), and guidelines (8.8%). Most articles cited were published after 2015 (61.6%), and were from infectious diseases journals (58.2%). The average journal impact factor was 13 (range 0.07–79), with Clinical Infectious Diseases as the most commonly mentioned journal (20.2%). Tweets were “liked” 14.5 times (range 0–80) and re-tweeted 4.6 times (range 0–33). The twitter engagement rate per tweet was 6.3% (range 2.2 to 12%) and article links were clicked 19 times (range 3–164). We are currently identifying Tweet characteristics associated with increased engagement rates. CONCLUSION: Our study provides a snapshot of the literature used to teach while on the ID clinical service and lays the groundwork for identifying teaching points that receive the most engagement. This tool enables teaching points and high-yield articles to be shared within and across institutions. Future studies will examine the impact that this tool has on fellow and faculty learning, and engagement with and knowledge of the current literature. [Image: see text] DISCLOSURES: All authors: No reported disclosures.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6810422
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-68104222019-10-28 2537. #IDDailyPearl: A Twitter Tool to Enhance Literature Engagement on Busy Infectious Diseases Consult Services Cowell, Annie N Wooten, Darcy Open Forum Infect Dis Abstracts BACKGROUND: Social media platforms enable on-demand, open-access learning which is attractive for busy clinicians and trainees. Additionally, teaching that occurs in a clinically contextualized, case-based setting in real time has the potential to be more effective than traditional didactics. We piloted a teaching tool to enhance learning and engagement with the literature for fellows on the infectious diseases (ID) consult service. METHODS: During a clinical service rotation, ID faculty posted a brief daily teaching point on Twitter under the hashtag “#IDDailyPearl” with a link to the relevant article. Tweets were required to be related to a patient case, associated with an article, and could not include patient identifiers. RESULTS: Over a 3-month period, there were 134 tweets that fit our criteria, with 103 tweets posted by UCSD faculty and 45 by faculty from other institutions. The most common topic was endocarditis and bacteremia (16.4%), followed by fungal infections (11%), tuberculosis (9.4%), and antimicrobials (9.4%) (Figure 1). Article types included review articles (21.6%), retrospective cohort studies (20.2%), case reports (13.5%), randomized controlled trials (12.1%), prospective cohort studies (9.4%), and guidelines (8.8%). Most articles cited were published after 2015 (61.6%), and were from infectious diseases journals (58.2%). The average journal impact factor was 13 (range 0.07–79), with Clinical Infectious Diseases as the most commonly mentioned journal (20.2%). Tweets were “liked” 14.5 times (range 0–80) and re-tweeted 4.6 times (range 0–33). The twitter engagement rate per tweet was 6.3% (range 2.2 to 12%) and article links were clicked 19 times (range 3–164). We are currently identifying Tweet characteristics associated with increased engagement rates. CONCLUSION: Our study provides a snapshot of the literature used to teach while on the ID clinical service and lays the groundwork for identifying teaching points that receive the most engagement. This tool enables teaching points and high-yield articles to be shared within and across institutions. Future studies will examine the impact that this tool has on fellow and faculty learning, and engagement with and knowledge of the current literature. [Image: see text] DISCLOSURES: All authors: No reported disclosures. Oxford University Press 2019-10-23 /pmc/articles/PMC6810422/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofz360.2215 Text en © The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial reproduction and distribution of the work, in any medium, provided the original work is not altered or transformed in any way, and that the work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Abstracts
Cowell, Annie N
Wooten, Darcy
2537. #IDDailyPearl: A Twitter Tool to Enhance Literature Engagement on Busy Infectious Diseases Consult Services
title 2537. #IDDailyPearl: A Twitter Tool to Enhance Literature Engagement on Busy Infectious Diseases Consult Services
title_full 2537. #IDDailyPearl: A Twitter Tool to Enhance Literature Engagement on Busy Infectious Diseases Consult Services
title_fullStr 2537. #IDDailyPearl: A Twitter Tool to Enhance Literature Engagement on Busy Infectious Diseases Consult Services
title_full_unstemmed 2537. #IDDailyPearl: A Twitter Tool to Enhance Literature Engagement on Busy Infectious Diseases Consult Services
title_short 2537. #IDDailyPearl: A Twitter Tool to Enhance Literature Engagement on Busy Infectious Diseases Consult Services
title_sort 2537. #iddailypearl: a twitter tool to enhance literature engagement on busy infectious diseases consult services
topic Abstracts
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6810422/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofz360.2215
work_keys_str_mv AT cowellannien 2537iddailypearlatwittertooltoenhanceliteratureengagementonbusyinfectiousdiseasesconsultservices
AT wootendarcy 2537iddailypearlatwittertooltoenhanceliteratureengagementonbusyinfectiousdiseasesconsultservices