Cargando…

2743. Safety of Recombinant Influenza Vaccine Compared with Inactivated Influenza Vaccine in Adults

BACKGROUND: In 2013, a recombinant trivalent influenza vaccine (RIV, Flublok®, Sanofi Pasteur) was licensed for use against influenza virus subtypes A and B contained in the vaccine for persons 18–49 years of age and approved for all adults ≥18 years of age in 2014. The study aim was to evaluate the...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hansen, John, Goddard, Kristin, Timbol, Julius, Zhang, Lea, Lewis, Ned, Klein, Nicola
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6810428/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofz360.2420
_version_ 1783462252702072832
author Hansen, John
Goddard, Kristin
Timbol, Julius
Zhang, Lea
Lewis, Ned
Klein, Nicola
author_facet Hansen, John
Goddard, Kristin
Timbol, Julius
Zhang, Lea
Lewis, Ned
Klein, Nicola
author_sort Hansen, John
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: In 2013, a recombinant trivalent influenza vaccine (RIV, Flublok®, Sanofi Pasteur) was licensed for use against influenza virus subtypes A and B contained in the vaccine for persons 18–49 years of age and approved for all adults ≥18 years of age in 2014. The study aim was to evaluate the safety of RIV compared with trivalent standard-dose, inactivated influenza vaccine (IIV3) in Kaiser Permanente Northern California (KPNC). METHODS: This was an observational, retrospective cohort study including all persons ≥18 years vaccinated in KPNC facilities with RIV or IIV3 during the 2015–2016 influenza season as part of routine clinical care. We compared the rates of pre-specified diagnoses of interest (Guillain-Barré Syndrome, pericarditis, pleural effusion, narcolepsy/cataplexy, asthma, acute hypersensitivity reactions and fever) using International Classification of Diseases codes during post-vaccination risk intervals 0–2, 0–13, 0–41, and 0–180 days, as well as all-cause hospitalization rates 0–180 days following vaccination. Comparing cohorts, we estimated odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) using logistic regression analyses adjusted for age, sex, race/ethnicity, month of vaccination, and concomitant receipt of other vaccinations. RESULTS: During the study period, 21,976 persons received RIV and 283,683 received IIV3. Comparing RIV with IIV3, there were no statistically significantly elevated outcomes. RIV vaccination was associated with significantly decreased fever in the 0–41 day risk interval (OR 0.38, 95% CI 0.14–0.86) and all-cause hospitalization (OR 0.66, 95% CI 0.61–0.73) in the 0–180 day risk interval. Further analyses found that the lower rates of hospitalization in RIV recipients was mostly, though not fully, related to pregnancy-related hospital events in the IIV3 cohort and to the presence of additional unmeasured confounding. There were no serious adverse events or deaths related to RIV or IIV3. CONCLUSION: This study did not identify any safety concerns regarding the use of RIV in adults. Understanding the observed reduction in all-cause hospitalization will need additional studies. DISCLOSURES: All authors: No reported disclosures.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6810428
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-68104282019-10-28 2743. Safety of Recombinant Influenza Vaccine Compared with Inactivated Influenza Vaccine in Adults Hansen, John Goddard, Kristin Timbol, Julius Zhang, Lea Lewis, Ned Klein, Nicola Open Forum Infect Dis Abstracts BACKGROUND: In 2013, a recombinant trivalent influenza vaccine (RIV, Flublok®, Sanofi Pasteur) was licensed for use against influenza virus subtypes A and B contained in the vaccine for persons 18–49 years of age and approved for all adults ≥18 years of age in 2014. The study aim was to evaluate the safety of RIV compared with trivalent standard-dose, inactivated influenza vaccine (IIV3) in Kaiser Permanente Northern California (KPNC). METHODS: This was an observational, retrospective cohort study including all persons ≥18 years vaccinated in KPNC facilities with RIV or IIV3 during the 2015–2016 influenza season as part of routine clinical care. We compared the rates of pre-specified diagnoses of interest (Guillain-Barré Syndrome, pericarditis, pleural effusion, narcolepsy/cataplexy, asthma, acute hypersensitivity reactions and fever) using International Classification of Diseases codes during post-vaccination risk intervals 0–2, 0–13, 0–41, and 0–180 days, as well as all-cause hospitalization rates 0–180 days following vaccination. Comparing cohorts, we estimated odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) using logistic regression analyses adjusted for age, sex, race/ethnicity, month of vaccination, and concomitant receipt of other vaccinations. RESULTS: During the study period, 21,976 persons received RIV and 283,683 received IIV3. Comparing RIV with IIV3, there were no statistically significantly elevated outcomes. RIV vaccination was associated with significantly decreased fever in the 0–41 day risk interval (OR 0.38, 95% CI 0.14–0.86) and all-cause hospitalization (OR 0.66, 95% CI 0.61–0.73) in the 0–180 day risk interval. Further analyses found that the lower rates of hospitalization in RIV recipients was mostly, though not fully, related to pregnancy-related hospital events in the IIV3 cohort and to the presence of additional unmeasured confounding. There were no serious adverse events or deaths related to RIV or IIV3. CONCLUSION: This study did not identify any safety concerns regarding the use of RIV in adults. Understanding the observed reduction in all-cause hospitalization will need additional studies. DISCLOSURES: All authors: No reported disclosures. Oxford University Press 2019-10-23 /pmc/articles/PMC6810428/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofz360.2420 Text en © The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial reproduction and distribution of the work, in any medium, provided the original work is not altered or transformed in any way, and that the work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Abstracts
Hansen, John
Goddard, Kristin
Timbol, Julius
Zhang, Lea
Lewis, Ned
Klein, Nicola
2743. Safety of Recombinant Influenza Vaccine Compared with Inactivated Influenza Vaccine in Adults
title 2743. Safety of Recombinant Influenza Vaccine Compared with Inactivated Influenza Vaccine in Adults
title_full 2743. Safety of Recombinant Influenza Vaccine Compared with Inactivated Influenza Vaccine in Adults
title_fullStr 2743. Safety of Recombinant Influenza Vaccine Compared with Inactivated Influenza Vaccine in Adults
title_full_unstemmed 2743. Safety of Recombinant Influenza Vaccine Compared with Inactivated Influenza Vaccine in Adults
title_short 2743. Safety of Recombinant Influenza Vaccine Compared with Inactivated Influenza Vaccine in Adults
title_sort 2743. safety of recombinant influenza vaccine compared with inactivated influenza vaccine in adults
topic Abstracts
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6810428/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofz360.2420
work_keys_str_mv AT hansenjohn 2743safetyofrecombinantinfluenzavaccinecomparedwithinactivatedinfluenzavaccineinadults
AT goddardkristin 2743safetyofrecombinantinfluenzavaccinecomparedwithinactivatedinfluenzavaccineinadults
AT timboljulius 2743safetyofrecombinantinfluenzavaccinecomparedwithinactivatedinfluenzavaccineinadults
AT zhanglea 2743safetyofrecombinantinfluenzavaccinecomparedwithinactivatedinfluenzavaccineinadults
AT lewisned 2743safetyofrecombinantinfluenzavaccinecomparedwithinactivatedinfluenzavaccineinadults
AT kleinnicola 2743safetyofrecombinantinfluenzavaccinecomparedwithinactivatedinfluenzavaccineinadults