Cargando…

141. Use of Rapid Diagnostic Testing in Gram-negative Bloodstream Infections with and without Antimicrobial Stewardship

BACKGROUND: Verigene Blood Culture Gram-Negative (VBC-GN) is a rapid diagnostic test (RDT) that can detect key GNs and resistance within hours from Gram-stain. Numerous studies have shown that RDTs in BSIs improve clinical outcomes, particularly with active antimicrobial stewardship (AMS) interventi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Claeys, Kimberly C, Heil, Emily, Loughry, Nora, Chainani, Sanjay, Kristie Johnson, J, Leekha, Surbhi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6810477/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofz360.216
_version_ 1783462265290227712
author Claeys, Kimberly C
Heil, Emily
Loughry, Nora
Chainani, Sanjay
Kristie Johnson, J
Leekha, Surbhi
author_facet Claeys, Kimberly C
Heil, Emily
Loughry, Nora
Chainani, Sanjay
Kristie Johnson, J
Leekha, Surbhi
author_sort Claeys, Kimberly C
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Verigene Blood Culture Gram-Negative (VBC-GN) is a rapid diagnostic test (RDT) that can detect key GNs and resistance within hours from Gram-stain. Numerous studies have shown that RDTs in BSIs improve clinical outcomes, particularly with active antimicrobial stewardship (AMS) intervention. Little is known regarding outcomes in GN BSI without vs. with AMS intervention. METHODS: A retrospective three-part quasi-experimental study of adult patients with GN BSI from December 2014 to April 2018. VBC-GN was introduced September 2015 and AMS review was implemented October 2017. Antibiotics were appropriate if active in vitro against isolated GN. Optimal antibiotics were not overly broad, accounted for resistance, source of infection, and other infecting organisms. Comparisons were made using Chi-squared for nominal variables and Kaplan–Meier with log-rank for time to event analysis. RESULTS: In total, 772 patients met inclusion. The most common source was urinary (30.1%) and E. coli was the most common GN (37.9%). Infectious Disease consults increased with each group (50.6% vs. 67.9% vs. 81.8%, P < 0.001). More patients pre-RDT (37.36%) and RDT+AMS (35.6%) compared with RDT only (24.6%) were critically ill, P = 0.001. Optimal therapy was achieved in more patients in RDT-only (79%) and RDT+AMS (86%) groups compared with pre-RDT (66%), P < 0.001. More patients in the pre-RDT group (44.7%) were appropriately de-escalated compared with RDT only (31.6%) and RDT + AMS (38.7%), P = 0.026. Appropriate escalation occurred most often in the RDT-only group (39.3%) vs. pre-RDT (15.2%) and RDT + AMS (14.2%), P = 0.019. Median post-BSI length of stay (8.2 vs. 7.1 vs. 8.5 days, P = 0.226) and inpatient mortality (10.8% vs. 14.3% vs. 11.4%, P = 0.493) were similar. CONCLUSION: With the implementation of VBC-GN RDT there was a significantly decreased time to optimal therapy, mainly based on necessary antibiotic escalation. Antibiotic de-escalation remained a challenge, even with active AMS review. [Image: see text] DISCLOSURES: All authors: No reported disclosures.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6810477
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-68104772019-10-28 141. Use of Rapid Diagnostic Testing in Gram-negative Bloodstream Infections with and without Antimicrobial Stewardship Claeys, Kimberly C Heil, Emily Loughry, Nora Chainani, Sanjay Kristie Johnson, J Leekha, Surbhi Open Forum Infect Dis Abstracts BACKGROUND: Verigene Blood Culture Gram-Negative (VBC-GN) is a rapid diagnostic test (RDT) that can detect key GNs and resistance within hours from Gram-stain. Numerous studies have shown that RDTs in BSIs improve clinical outcomes, particularly with active antimicrobial stewardship (AMS) intervention. Little is known regarding outcomes in GN BSI without vs. with AMS intervention. METHODS: A retrospective three-part quasi-experimental study of adult patients with GN BSI from December 2014 to April 2018. VBC-GN was introduced September 2015 and AMS review was implemented October 2017. Antibiotics were appropriate if active in vitro against isolated GN. Optimal antibiotics were not overly broad, accounted for resistance, source of infection, and other infecting organisms. Comparisons were made using Chi-squared for nominal variables and Kaplan–Meier with log-rank for time to event analysis. RESULTS: In total, 772 patients met inclusion. The most common source was urinary (30.1%) and E. coli was the most common GN (37.9%). Infectious Disease consults increased with each group (50.6% vs. 67.9% vs. 81.8%, P < 0.001). More patients pre-RDT (37.36%) and RDT+AMS (35.6%) compared with RDT only (24.6%) were critically ill, P = 0.001. Optimal therapy was achieved in more patients in RDT-only (79%) and RDT+AMS (86%) groups compared with pre-RDT (66%), P < 0.001. More patients in the pre-RDT group (44.7%) were appropriately de-escalated compared with RDT only (31.6%) and RDT + AMS (38.7%), P = 0.026. Appropriate escalation occurred most often in the RDT-only group (39.3%) vs. pre-RDT (15.2%) and RDT + AMS (14.2%), P = 0.019. Median post-BSI length of stay (8.2 vs. 7.1 vs. 8.5 days, P = 0.226) and inpatient mortality (10.8% vs. 14.3% vs. 11.4%, P = 0.493) were similar. CONCLUSION: With the implementation of VBC-GN RDT there was a significantly decreased time to optimal therapy, mainly based on necessary antibiotic escalation. Antibiotic de-escalation remained a challenge, even with active AMS review. [Image: see text] DISCLOSURES: All authors: No reported disclosures. Oxford University Press 2019-10-23 /pmc/articles/PMC6810477/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofz360.216 Text en © The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial reproduction and distribution of the work, in any medium, provided the original work is not altered or transformed in any way, and that the work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Abstracts
Claeys, Kimberly C
Heil, Emily
Loughry, Nora
Chainani, Sanjay
Kristie Johnson, J
Leekha, Surbhi
141. Use of Rapid Diagnostic Testing in Gram-negative Bloodstream Infections with and without Antimicrobial Stewardship
title 141. Use of Rapid Diagnostic Testing in Gram-negative Bloodstream Infections with and without Antimicrobial Stewardship
title_full 141. Use of Rapid Diagnostic Testing in Gram-negative Bloodstream Infections with and without Antimicrobial Stewardship
title_fullStr 141. Use of Rapid Diagnostic Testing in Gram-negative Bloodstream Infections with and without Antimicrobial Stewardship
title_full_unstemmed 141. Use of Rapid Diagnostic Testing in Gram-negative Bloodstream Infections with and without Antimicrobial Stewardship
title_short 141. Use of Rapid Diagnostic Testing in Gram-negative Bloodstream Infections with and without Antimicrobial Stewardship
title_sort 141. use of rapid diagnostic testing in gram-negative bloodstream infections with and without antimicrobial stewardship
topic Abstracts
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6810477/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofz360.216
work_keys_str_mv AT claeyskimberlyc 141useofrapiddiagnostictestingingramnegativebloodstreaminfectionswithandwithoutantimicrobialstewardship
AT heilemily 141useofrapiddiagnostictestingingramnegativebloodstreaminfectionswithandwithoutantimicrobialstewardship
AT loughrynora 141useofrapiddiagnostictestingingramnegativebloodstreaminfectionswithandwithoutantimicrobialstewardship
AT chainanisanjay 141useofrapiddiagnostictestingingramnegativebloodstreaminfectionswithandwithoutantimicrobialstewardship
AT kristiejohnsonj 141useofrapiddiagnostictestingingramnegativebloodstreaminfectionswithandwithoutantimicrobialstewardship
AT leekhasurbhi 141useofrapiddiagnostictestingingramnegativebloodstreaminfectionswithandwithoutantimicrobialstewardship