Cargando…

2126. Comparison of Time to Appropriate Antibiotic Between Using Microarray Assay and Mass Spectrometry Technique for Identification of Positive Blood Cultures

BACKGROUND: Microarray-based, multiplexed, automated molecular method is a rapid diagnosis of bloodstream infections by directly identify bacterial pathogens and antibiotic resistance by detection resistance genes from positive blood culture. Previous studies showed significantly reduce time to orga...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sakulkonkij, Parichart, Salee, Parichat, Katip, Wasan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6810488/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofz360.1806
_version_ 1783462268009185280
author Sakulkonkij, Parichart
Salee, Parichat
Katip, Wasan
author_facet Sakulkonkij, Parichart
Salee, Parichat
Katip, Wasan
author_sort Sakulkonkij, Parichart
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Microarray-based, multiplexed, automated molecular method is a rapid diagnosis of bloodstream infections by directly identify bacterial pathogens and antibiotic resistance by detection resistance genes from positive blood culture. Previous studies showed significantly reduce time to organism identification from positive blood culture and antibiotic resistance gene with 97.1% sensitivity and 100% specificity. This study aimed to evaluate time to appropriate antibiotic between using Microarray Assay and Mass Spectrometry technique for bacterial identification. METHODS: one hundred and forty-five patients with bloodstream infection in medical ward were enrolled between 1 June 2018 and 31 January 2019. There were 2 study periods (pre-intervention and post-intervention), using MALDI-TOF combined with the conventional microbiological method as the current standard diagnostic method in pre-intervention group (N = 70) and microarray technique was used add-on to post-intervention group (N = 75). Antibiotic therapy was adjusted by infectious disease team in both periods of study. RESULTS: There were significantly faster bacterial identification and detection of antibiotic resistance (39.34 hours vs. 5 hours, P = 0.0001) as well as time to adjust specific antibiotic therapy (75 hours vs. 27.65 hours, P = 0.0001) resulted in earlier appropriate antibiotic therapy (31 hours vs. 0 hours, P = 0.005) and decrease unnecessary of antibiotic adjustment (51.4% vs. 37.3%). However, all-cause mortality within 2 weeks was not significantly reduced (11.4% vs. 14.7%), no differences cost of antibiotic therapy and length of hospital stay (13 days vs. 17 days). CONCLUSION: Microarray technique has rapid turnaround time to bacterial identification and detection of some resistant genes. A combination of this technique and clinical judgement encourage earlier appropriateness antibiotic therapy and may be helpful in antibiotic stewardship program. [Image: see text] DISCLOSURES: All authors: No reported disclosures.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6810488
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-68104882019-10-28 2126. Comparison of Time to Appropriate Antibiotic Between Using Microarray Assay and Mass Spectrometry Technique for Identification of Positive Blood Cultures Sakulkonkij, Parichart Salee, Parichat Katip, Wasan Open Forum Infect Dis Abstracts BACKGROUND: Microarray-based, multiplexed, automated molecular method is a rapid diagnosis of bloodstream infections by directly identify bacterial pathogens and antibiotic resistance by detection resistance genes from positive blood culture. Previous studies showed significantly reduce time to organism identification from positive blood culture and antibiotic resistance gene with 97.1% sensitivity and 100% specificity. This study aimed to evaluate time to appropriate antibiotic between using Microarray Assay and Mass Spectrometry technique for bacterial identification. METHODS: one hundred and forty-five patients with bloodstream infection in medical ward were enrolled between 1 June 2018 and 31 January 2019. There were 2 study periods (pre-intervention and post-intervention), using MALDI-TOF combined with the conventional microbiological method as the current standard diagnostic method in pre-intervention group (N = 70) and microarray technique was used add-on to post-intervention group (N = 75). Antibiotic therapy was adjusted by infectious disease team in both periods of study. RESULTS: There were significantly faster bacterial identification and detection of antibiotic resistance (39.34 hours vs. 5 hours, P = 0.0001) as well as time to adjust specific antibiotic therapy (75 hours vs. 27.65 hours, P = 0.0001) resulted in earlier appropriate antibiotic therapy (31 hours vs. 0 hours, P = 0.005) and decrease unnecessary of antibiotic adjustment (51.4% vs. 37.3%). However, all-cause mortality within 2 weeks was not significantly reduced (11.4% vs. 14.7%), no differences cost of antibiotic therapy and length of hospital stay (13 days vs. 17 days). CONCLUSION: Microarray technique has rapid turnaround time to bacterial identification and detection of some resistant genes. A combination of this technique and clinical judgement encourage earlier appropriateness antibiotic therapy and may be helpful in antibiotic stewardship program. [Image: see text] DISCLOSURES: All authors: No reported disclosures. Oxford University Press 2019-10-23 /pmc/articles/PMC6810488/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofz360.1806 Text en © The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial reproduction and distribution of the work, in any medium, provided the original work is not altered or transformed in any way, and that the work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Abstracts
Sakulkonkij, Parichart
Salee, Parichat
Katip, Wasan
2126. Comparison of Time to Appropriate Antibiotic Between Using Microarray Assay and Mass Spectrometry Technique for Identification of Positive Blood Cultures
title 2126. Comparison of Time to Appropriate Antibiotic Between Using Microarray Assay and Mass Spectrometry Technique for Identification of Positive Blood Cultures
title_full 2126. Comparison of Time to Appropriate Antibiotic Between Using Microarray Assay and Mass Spectrometry Technique for Identification of Positive Blood Cultures
title_fullStr 2126. Comparison of Time to Appropriate Antibiotic Between Using Microarray Assay and Mass Spectrometry Technique for Identification of Positive Blood Cultures
title_full_unstemmed 2126. Comparison of Time to Appropriate Antibiotic Between Using Microarray Assay and Mass Spectrometry Technique for Identification of Positive Blood Cultures
title_short 2126. Comparison of Time to Appropriate Antibiotic Between Using Microarray Assay and Mass Spectrometry Technique for Identification of Positive Blood Cultures
title_sort 2126. comparison of time to appropriate antibiotic between using microarray assay and mass spectrometry technique for identification of positive blood cultures
topic Abstracts
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6810488/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofz360.1806
work_keys_str_mv AT sakulkonkijparichart 2126comparisonoftimetoappropriateantibioticbetweenusingmicroarrayassayandmassspectrometrytechniqueforidentificationofpositivebloodcultures
AT saleeparichat 2126comparisonoftimetoappropriateantibioticbetweenusingmicroarrayassayandmassspectrometrytechniqueforidentificationofpositivebloodcultures
AT katipwasan 2126comparisonoftimetoappropriateantibioticbetweenusingmicroarrayassayandmassspectrometrytechniqueforidentificationofpositivebloodcultures