Cargando…

388. Spinal Implant Infections Treated with Debridement and Hardware Retention

BACKGROUND: Surgical site infections following spinal surgery affect 0. 3 to 20% of patients. The longer the infection, the greater the chance of antibiotic treatment failure due to the establishment of mature microbial biofilm on the hardware, requiring its removal for infection eradication. METHOD...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rivero, Cynthia, Martinez, Santiago, Pardo, Orlando, Jahan, Cintia, Fuego, Segundo, Ignacio Dapas, juan, Vila, Andrea
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6810501/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofz360.461
_version_ 1783462271129747456
author Rivero, Cynthia
Martinez, Santiago
Pardo, Orlando
Jahan, Cintia
Fuego, Segundo
Ignacio Dapas, juan
Vila, Andrea
author_facet Rivero, Cynthia
Martinez, Santiago
Pardo, Orlando
Jahan, Cintia
Fuego, Segundo
Ignacio Dapas, juan
Vila, Andrea
author_sort Rivero, Cynthia
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Surgical site infections following spinal surgery affect 0. 3 to 20% of patients. The longer the infection, the greater the chance of antibiotic treatment failure due to the establishment of mature microbial biofilm on the hardware, requiring its removal for infection eradication. METHODS: Retrospective cohort of patients with microbiologically confirmed SII following spinal surgery treated with debridement and retention. SII was defined as the presence of clinical signs of deep surgical site infection with 2 or more positive culture results of tissue surrounding the implant taken during surgical debridement; or from CT guided biopsy. Inclusion criteria: adults with a 1º episode of microbiological confirmed SII diagnosed from 2008 to 2017 with >2 years of follow-up, treated with implant retention. Definitions Early-onset infection (EOI): infection < 1 month following implant placement. Late onset infection (LOI): between 30 days and 1 year after implant placement. Delayed onset infection (DOI): >1 year of implant placement. Statistical analysis made in Graph Pad Prism 5. 0. RESULTS: We analyzed 19 patients with SII treated with hardware retention. Mean age was 54 (21–70) years, 63% were female. Comorbidities, clinical manifestations and motive for surgery are in Table 1 and Figure 1. Hardware material used was titanium 15(79%) and steel 4(21%). In addition to the hardware,11 patients (57. 9%) underwent bone grafting, 4 experienced treatment failure (4/11 = 36. 4%); 2 patients had nonmetallic material inserted (carbon polymer), the 2 patients experienced failure. 16 patients (84. 2%) had EOI, 2 (10. 5%) LOI, 1 (5. 3%) DOI. Failure requiring implant removal was observed in 26. 3% (n = 5), 2 of the cases were EOI, 2 LOI and 1 DOI. Bacterial characteristics of patients are shown in Table 2. 47,4% of patients required more than one debridement (Figure 2). In the lineal regression model, treatment failure was associated with bone grafting (P = 0. 04) and the use of carbon polymer materials (P = 0. 007). CONCLUSION: Treatment of SII with debridement plus antimicrobials treatment is acceptable, with a rate failure of 26%. In LOI and DOI spinal implant retention is more prone to fail. Bone grafting and the presence of polymers seem to be associated with treatment failure of conservative strategies. [Image: see text] [Image: see text] [Image: see text] [Image: see text] DISCLOSURES: All authors: No reported disclosures.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6810501
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-68105012019-10-28 388. Spinal Implant Infections Treated with Debridement and Hardware Retention Rivero, Cynthia Martinez, Santiago Pardo, Orlando Jahan, Cintia Fuego, Segundo Ignacio Dapas, juan Vila, Andrea Open Forum Infect Dis Abstracts BACKGROUND: Surgical site infections following spinal surgery affect 0. 3 to 20% of patients. The longer the infection, the greater the chance of antibiotic treatment failure due to the establishment of mature microbial biofilm on the hardware, requiring its removal for infection eradication. METHODS: Retrospective cohort of patients with microbiologically confirmed SII following spinal surgery treated with debridement and retention. SII was defined as the presence of clinical signs of deep surgical site infection with 2 or more positive culture results of tissue surrounding the implant taken during surgical debridement; or from CT guided biopsy. Inclusion criteria: adults with a 1º episode of microbiological confirmed SII diagnosed from 2008 to 2017 with >2 years of follow-up, treated with implant retention. Definitions Early-onset infection (EOI): infection < 1 month following implant placement. Late onset infection (LOI): between 30 days and 1 year after implant placement. Delayed onset infection (DOI): >1 year of implant placement. Statistical analysis made in Graph Pad Prism 5. 0. RESULTS: We analyzed 19 patients with SII treated with hardware retention. Mean age was 54 (21–70) years, 63% were female. Comorbidities, clinical manifestations and motive for surgery are in Table 1 and Figure 1. Hardware material used was titanium 15(79%) and steel 4(21%). In addition to the hardware,11 patients (57. 9%) underwent bone grafting, 4 experienced treatment failure (4/11 = 36. 4%); 2 patients had nonmetallic material inserted (carbon polymer), the 2 patients experienced failure. 16 patients (84. 2%) had EOI, 2 (10. 5%) LOI, 1 (5. 3%) DOI. Failure requiring implant removal was observed in 26. 3% (n = 5), 2 of the cases were EOI, 2 LOI and 1 DOI. Bacterial characteristics of patients are shown in Table 2. 47,4% of patients required more than one debridement (Figure 2). In the lineal regression model, treatment failure was associated with bone grafting (P = 0. 04) and the use of carbon polymer materials (P = 0. 007). CONCLUSION: Treatment of SII with debridement plus antimicrobials treatment is acceptable, with a rate failure of 26%. In LOI and DOI spinal implant retention is more prone to fail. Bone grafting and the presence of polymers seem to be associated with treatment failure of conservative strategies. [Image: see text] [Image: see text] [Image: see text] [Image: see text] DISCLOSURES: All authors: No reported disclosures. Oxford University Press 2019-10-23 /pmc/articles/PMC6810501/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofz360.461 Text en © The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial reproduction and distribution of the work, in any medium, provided the original work is not altered or transformed in any way, and that the work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Abstracts
Rivero, Cynthia
Martinez, Santiago
Pardo, Orlando
Jahan, Cintia
Fuego, Segundo
Ignacio Dapas, juan
Vila, Andrea
388. Spinal Implant Infections Treated with Debridement and Hardware Retention
title 388. Spinal Implant Infections Treated with Debridement and Hardware Retention
title_full 388. Spinal Implant Infections Treated with Debridement and Hardware Retention
title_fullStr 388. Spinal Implant Infections Treated with Debridement and Hardware Retention
title_full_unstemmed 388. Spinal Implant Infections Treated with Debridement and Hardware Retention
title_short 388. Spinal Implant Infections Treated with Debridement and Hardware Retention
title_sort 388. spinal implant infections treated with debridement and hardware retention
topic Abstracts
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6810501/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofz360.461
work_keys_str_mv AT riverocynthia 388spinalimplantinfectionstreatedwithdebridementandhardwareretention
AT martinezsantiago 388spinalimplantinfectionstreatedwithdebridementandhardwareretention
AT pardoorlando 388spinalimplantinfectionstreatedwithdebridementandhardwareretention
AT jahancintia 388spinalimplantinfectionstreatedwithdebridementandhardwareretention
AT fuegosegundo 388spinalimplantinfectionstreatedwithdebridementandhardwareretention
AT ignaciodapasjuan 388spinalimplantinfectionstreatedwithdebridementandhardwareretention
AT vilaandrea 388spinalimplantinfectionstreatedwithdebridementandhardwareretention