Cargando…
2100. A Retrospective Chart Review of Emergent Antibiotic Use
BACKGROUND: The need for responsible antibiotic stewardship can be difficult to reconcile with the clinician’s task of quickly recognizing and treating sepsis. Empiric antibiotics are often given in patients with any suspicion of infection, yet antibiotics carry non-trivial risks including antibioti...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6810505/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofz360.1780 |
_version_ | 1783462272089194496 |
---|---|
author | Blyth, Michelle McNary, James Decano, Arnold Renson, Audrey Carey, Jeanne |
author_facet | Blyth, Michelle McNary, James Decano, Arnold Renson, Audrey Carey, Jeanne |
author_sort | Blyth, Michelle |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The need for responsible antibiotic stewardship can be difficult to reconcile with the clinician’s task of quickly recognizing and treating sepsis. Empiric antibiotics are often given in patients with any suspicion of infection, yet antibiotics carry non-trivial risks including antibiotic resistance and susceptibility to other infections, such as Clostridium difficile. METHODS: This retrospective chart review includes 200 patients who were admitted to the hospital and administered antibiotics while in the Emergency Department (ED). From clinical documentation several clinical data points were gathered such as: changes to (including discontinuation of) antibiotics by the admitting team, final culture data, discharge diagnosis, vital signs and routine laboratory values. RESULTS: Our study finds that the majority of patients administered antibiotics in the ED of our academic community hospital were not diagnosed with sepsis (67%) and did not meet SIRS (62.5%) nor qSOFA (88%) criteria prior to administration of antibiotics. Vancomycin (39.7%) and piperacillin–tazobactam (22.2%) were the most frequent empiric antibiotics started. Antibiotics were stopped completely on admission by the admitting team in 22.2% of included patients. A wide variety of sources of infection were suspected, pneumonia (33%), cellulitis (15%), and cystitis (18%) being the most common. The overall mortality rate for this group during the admission was 4.5%, which was comparable to all-cause hospital mortality during the same time period. Infection was ruled out by discharge in 91 of the included 200 patients (45.5%). At least 37.5% of all included patients had received antibiotics within the last 3 months. Intriguingly, recent exposure was nearly twice as common (47.8%) among infected patients than in those without infections (24.7%), with a relative risk of 1.48 (CI 1.0993–2.0014). CONCLUSION: These findings suggest that an opportunity exists for increased antibiotic stewardship in the emergency department in the management of suspected sepsis and/or infection. Stable patients in whom infection cannot be definitively ruled out may benefit more from prompt, thorough evaluation by an admitting team prior to the initiation of empiric antibiotics. DISCLOSURES: All authors: No reported disclosures. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6810505 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-68105052019-10-28 2100. A Retrospective Chart Review of Emergent Antibiotic Use Blyth, Michelle McNary, James Decano, Arnold Renson, Audrey Carey, Jeanne Open Forum Infect Dis Abstracts BACKGROUND: The need for responsible antibiotic stewardship can be difficult to reconcile with the clinician’s task of quickly recognizing and treating sepsis. Empiric antibiotics are often given in patients with any suspicion of infection, yet antibiotics carry non-trivial risks including antibiotic resistance and susceptibility to other infections, such as Clostridium difficile. METHODS: This retrospective chart review includes 200 patients who were admitted to the hospital and administered antibiotics while in the Emergency Department (ED). From clinical documentation several clinical data points were gathered such as: changes to (including discontinuation of) antibiotics by the admitting team, final culture data, discharge diagnosis, vital signs and routine laboratory values. RESULTS: Our study finds that the majority of patients administered antibiotics in the ED of our academic community hospital were not diagnosed with sepsis (67%) and did not meet SIRS (62.5%) nor qSOFA (88%) criteria prior to administration of antibiotics. Vancomycin (39.7%) and piperacillin–tazobactam (22.2%) were the most frequent empiric antibiotics started. Antibiotics were stopped completely on admission by the admitting team in 22.2% of included patients. A wide variety of sources of infection were suspected, pneumonia (33%), cellulitis (15%), and cystitis (18%) being the most common. The overall mortality rate for this group during the admission was 4.5%, which was comparable to all-cause hospital mortality during the same time period. Infection was ruled out by discharge in 91 of the included 200 patients (45.5%). At least 37.5% of all included patients had received antibiotics within the last 3 months. Intriguingly, recent exposure was nearly twice as common (47.8%) among infected patients than in those without infections (24.7%), with a relative risk of 1.48 (CI 1.0993–2.0014). CONCLUSION: These findings suggest that an opportunity exists for increased antibiotic stewardship in the emergency department in the management of suspected sepsis and/or infection. Stable patients in whom infection cannot be definitively ruled out may benefit more from prompt, thorough evaluation by an admitting team prior to the initiation of empiric antibiotics. DISCLOSURES: All authors: No reported disclosures. Oxford University Press 2019-10-23 /pmc/articles/PMC6810505/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofz360.1780 Text en © The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial reproduction and distribution of the work, in any medium, provided the original work is not altered or transformed in any way, and that the work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com |
spellingShingle | Abstracts Blyth, Michelle McNary, James Decano, Arnold Renson, Audrey Carey, Jeanne 2100. A Retrospective Chart Review of Emergent Antibiotic Use |
title | 2100. A Retrospective Chart Review of Emergent Antibiotic Use |
title_full | 2100. A Retrospective Chart Review of Emergent Antibiotic Use |
title_fullStr | 2100. A Retrospective Chart Review of Emergent Antibiotic Use |
title_full_unstemmed | 2100. A Retrospective Chart Review of Emergent Antibiotic Use |
title_short | 2100. A Retrospective Chart Review of Emergent Antibiotic Use |
title_sort | 2100. a retrospective chart review of emergent antibiotic use |
topic | Abstracts |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6810505/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofz360.1780 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT blythmichelle 2100aretrospectivechartreviewofemergentantibioticuse AT mcnaryjames 2100aretrospectivechartreviewofemergentantibioticuse AT decanoarnold 2100aretrospectivechartreviewofemergentantibioticuse AT rensonaudrey 2100aretrospectivechartreviewofemergentantibioticuse AT careyjeanne 2100aretrospectivechartreviewofemergentantibioticuse |