Cargando…

2100. A Retrospective Chart Review of Emergent Antibiotic Use

BACKGROUND: The need for responsible antibiotic stewardship can be difficult to reconcile with the clinician’s task of quickly recognizing and treating sepsis. Empiric antibiotics are often given in patients with any suspicion of infection, yet antibiotics carry non-trivial risks including antibioti...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Blyth, Michelle, McNary, James, Decano, Arnold, Renson, Audrey, Carey, Jeanne
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6810505/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofz360.1780
_version_ 1783462272089194496
author Blyth, Michelle
McNary, James
Decano, Arnold
Renson, Audrey
Carey, Jeanne
author_facet Blyth, Michelle
McNary, James
Decano, Arnold
Renson, Audrey
Carey, Jeanne
author_sort Blyth, Michelle
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The need for responsible antibiotic stewardship can be difficult to reconcile with the clinician’s task of quickly recognizing and treating sepsis. Empiric antibiotics are often given in patients with any suspicion of infection, yet antibiotics carry non-trivial risks including antibiotic resistance and susceptibility to other infections, such as Clostridium difficile. METHODS: This retrospective chart review includes 200 patients who were admitted to the hospital and administered antibiotics while in the Emergency Department (ED). From clinical documentation several clinical data points were gathered such as: changes to (including discontinuation of) antibiotics by the admitting team, final culture data, discharge diagnosis, vital signs and routine laboratory values. RESULTS: Our study finds that the majority of patients administered antibiotics in the ED of our academic community hospital were not diagnosed with sepsis (67%) and did not meet SIRS (62.5%) nor qSOFA (88%) criteria prior to administration of antibiotics. Vancomycin (39.7%) and piperacillin–tazobactam (22.2%) were the most frequent empiric antibiotics started. Antibiotics were stopped completely on admission by the admitting team in 22.2% of included patients. A wide variety of sources of infection were suspected, pneumonia (33%), cellulitis (15%), and cystitis (18%) being the most common. The overall mortality rate for this group during the admission was 4.5%, which was comparable to all-cause hospital mortality during the same time period. Infection was ruled out by discharge in 91 of the included 200 patients (45.5%). At least 37.5% of all included patients had received antibiotics within the last 3 months. Intriguingly, recent exposure was nearly twice as common (47.8%) among infected patients than in those without infections (24.7%), with a relative risk of 1.48 (CI 1.0993–2.0014). CONCLUSION: These findings suggest that an opportunity exists for increased antibiotic stewardship in the emergency department in the management of suspected sepsis and/or infection. Stable patients in whom infection cannot be definitively ruled out may benefit more from prompt, thorough evaluation by an admitting team prior to the initiation of empiric antibiotics. DISCLOSURES: All authors: No reported disclosures.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6810505
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-68105052019-10-28 2100. A Retrospective Chart Review of Emergent Antibiotic Use Blyth, Michelle McNary, James Decano, Arnold Renson, Audrey Carey, Jeanne Open Forum Infect Dis Abstracts BACKGROUND: The need for responsible antibiotic stewardship can be difficult to reconcile with the clinician’s task of quickly recognizing and treating sepsis. Empiric antibiotics are often given in patients with any suspicion of infection, yet antibiotics carry non-trivial risks including antibiotic resistance and susceptibility to other infections, such as Clostridium difficile. METHODS: This retrospective chart review includes 200 patients who were admitted to the hospital and administered antibiotics while in the Emergency Department (ED). From clinical documentation several clinical data points were gathered such as: changes to (including discontinuation of) antibiotics by the admitting team, final culture data, discharge diagnosis, vital signs and routine laboratory values. RESULTS: Our study finds that the majority of patients administered antibiotics in the ED of our academic community hospital were not diagnosed with sepsis (67%) and did not meet SIRS (62.5%) nor qSOFA (88%) criteria prior to administration of antibiotics. Vancomycin (39.7%) and piperacillin–tazobactam (22.2%) were the most frequent empiric antibiotics started. Antibiotics were stopped completely on admission by the admitting team in 22.2% of included patients. A wide variety of sources of infection were suspected, pneumonia (33%), cellulitis (15%), and cystitis (18%) being the most common. The overall mortality rate for this group during the admission was 4.5%, which was comparable to all-cause hospital mortality during the same time period. Infection was ruled out by discharge in 91 of the included 200 patients (45.5%). At least 37.5% of all included patients had received antibiotics within the last 3 months. Intriguingly, recent exposure was nearly twice as common (47.8%) among infected patients than in those without infections (24.7%), with a relative risk of 1.48 (CI 1.0993–2.0014). CONCLUSION: These findings suggest that an opportunity exists for increased antibiotic stewardship in the emergency department in the management of suspected sepsis and/or infection. Stable patients in whom infection cannot be definitively ruled out may benefit more from prompt, thorough evaluation by an admitting team prior to the initiation of empiric antibiotics. DISCLOSURES: All authors: No reported disclosures. Oxford University Press 2019-10-23 /pmc/articles/PMC6810505/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofz360.1780 Text en © The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial reproduction and distribution of the work, in any medium, provided the original work is not altered or transformed in any way, and that the work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Abstracts
Blyth, Michelle
McNary, James
Decano, Arnold
Renson, Audrey
Carey, Jeanne
2100. A Retrospective Chart Review of Emergent Antibiotic Use
title 2100. A Retrospective Chart Review of Emergent Antibiotic Use
title_full 2100. A Retrospective Chart Review of Emergent Antibiotic Use
title_fullStr 2100. A Retrospective Chart Review of Emergent Antibiotic Use
title_full_unstemmed 2100. A Retrospective Chart Review of Emergent Antibiotic Use
title_short 2100. A Retrospective Chart Review of Emergent Antibiotic Use
title_sort 2100. a retrospective chart review of emergent antibiotic use
topic Abstracts
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6810505/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofz360.1780
work_keys_str_mv AT blythmichelle 2100aretrospectivechartreviewofemergentantibioticuse
AT mcnaryjames 2100aretrospectivechartreviewofemergentantibioticuse
AT decanoarnold 2100aretrospectivechartreviewofemergentantibioticuse
AT rensonaudrey 2100aretrospectivechartreviewofemergentantibioticuse
AT careyjeanne 2100aretrospectivechartreviewofemergentantibioticuse