Cargando…

192. Augmenting Utility of Rapid Diagnostic Testing in Treatment of Gram-Negative Bacteremia with Stewardship Intervention

BACKGROUND: Rapid diagnostic tests (RDT) can identify pathogens in bloodstream infections (BSI) in less than 24 hours. Our institution utilizes an RDT for blood cultures (BCx) that can detect various organisms and resistance determinants. A retrospective evaluation conducted in our institution calcu...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gerges, Jessica, Raja, Karan, Patel, Mitesh, Patel, Ruben, Chen, Brandon, Philips, Mona
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6810549/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofz360.267
_version_ 1783462282667229184
author Gerges, Jessica
Raja, Karan
Patel, Mitesh
Patel, Ruben
Chen, Brandon
Philips, Mona
author_facet Gerges, Jessica
Raja, Karan
Patel, Mitesh
Patel, Ruben
Chen, Brandon
Philips, Mona
author_sort Gerges, Jessica
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Rapid diagnostic tests (RDT) can identify pathogens in bloodstream infections (BSI) in less than 24 hours. Our institution utilizes an RDT for blood cultures (BCx) that can detect various organisms and resistance determinants. A retrospective evaluation conducted in our institution calculated the negative predictive values (NPV) of various Gram-negative pathogens and susceptibility to target antimicrobials in the absence of detected resistance markers. Resultant NPV >90% for E. coli and K. pneumoniae to ceftriaxone support use of RDT with stewardship intervention for more rapid de-escalation of antimicrobial therapy in patients with resistance marker-negative BSI. METHODS: In our facility, all positive BCx are processed through RDT. In the post-intervention group, pharmacists monitored RDT results and provided recommendations. Our IRB-approved, prospective study assessed time to antimicrobial de-escalation in treatment of resistance marker-negative E. coli and K. pneumoniae BSI before (January 1 to December 31, 2018) and after Stewardship intervention (January 1 to March 31, 2019). Secondary outcomes included days of therapy (DOT) of target narrow-spectrum β-lactams, carbapenems, and non-carbapenem anti-pseudomonal (NCAP) β-lactams, length of stay (LOS), and treatment failure. Data were analyzed using the Fisher exact or Chi-square and t-test for categorical and continuous data, respectively. RESULTS: Of the 12,893 evaluated RDT results in the pre-intervention group and 2,238 post intervention, 41 and 12 patients met inclusion criteria, respectively. Baseline characteristics were similar in both groups. Time to de-escalation to a target agent was decreased by 24 hours after stewardship intervention (50 v 74.6 hours) (P = 0.14). There were no statistically significant differences in DOTs for target agents (5.19 v 5.25 DOT; P = 0.48), carbapenems (1.29 v 1.08 DOT; P = 0.41), or NCAP β-lactams (1.73 v 2.33; P = 0.25). Treatment failure (2 in each group; P = 0.17) and LOS (10.9 v 11.9 days; P = 0.4) were similar between groups. Protocol compliance and intervention acceptance rate was approximately 60%. CONCLUSION: Appreciation of NPVs and utilization of stewardship intervention allowed for early de-escalation of empiric therapy in patients with resistance marker-negative E. coli and K. pneumoniae bacteremia. [Image: see text] [Image: see text] [Image: see text] [Image: see text] DISCLOSURES: All authors: No reported disclosures.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6810549
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-68105492019-10-28 192. Augmenting Utility of Rapid Diagnostic Testing in Treatment of Gram-Negative Bacteremia with Stewardship Intervention Gerges, Jessica Raja, Karan Patel, Mitesh Patel, Ruben Chen, Brandon Philips, Mona Open Forum Infect Dis Abstracts BACKGROUND: Rapid diagnostic tests (RDT) can identify pathogens in bloodstream infections (BSI) in less than 24 hours. Our institution utilizes an RDT for blood cultures (BCx) that can detect various organisms and resistance determinants. A retrospective evaluation conducted in our institution calculated the negative predictive values (NPV) of various Gram-negative pathogens and susceptibility to target antimicrobials in the absence of detected resistance markers. Resultant NPV >90% for E. coli and K. pneumoniae to ceftriaxone support use of RDT with stewardship intervention for more rapid de-escalation of antimicrobial therapy in patients with resistance marker-negative BSI. METHODS: In our facility, all positive BCx are processed through RDT. In the post-intervention group, pharmacists monitored RDT results and provided recommendations. Our IRB-approved, prospective study assessed time to antimicrobial de-escalation in treatment of resistance marker-negative E. coli and K. pneumoniae BSI before (January 1 to December 31, 2018) and after Stewardship intervention (January 1 to March 31, 2019). Secondary outcomes included days of therapy (DOT) of target narrow-spectrum β-lactams, carbapenems, and non-carbapenem anti-pseudomonal (NCAP) β-lactams, length of stay (LOS), and treatment failure. Data were analyzed using the Fisher exact or Chi-square and t-test for categorical and continuous data, respectively. RESULTS: Of the 12,893 evaluated RDT results in the pre-intervention group and 2,238 post intervention, 41 and 12 patients met inclusion criteria, respectively. Baseline characteristics were similar in both groups. Time to de-escalation to a target agent was decreased by 24 hours after stewardship intervention (50 v 74.6 hours) (P = 0.14). There were no statistically significant differences in DOTs for target agents (5.19 v 5.25 DOT; P = 0.48), carbapenems (1.29 v 1.08 DOT; P = 0.41), or NCAP β-lactams (1.73 v 2.33; P = 0.25). Treatment failure (2 in each group; P = 0.17) and LOS (10.9 v 11.9 days; P = 0.4) were similar between groups. Protocol compliance and intervention acceptance rate was approximately 60%. CONCLUSION: Appreciation of NPVs and utilization of stewardship intervention allowed for early de-escalation of empiric therapy in patients with resistance marker-negative E. coli and K. pneumoniae bacteremia. [Image: see text] [Image: see text] [Image: see text] [Image: see text] DISCLOSURES: All authors: No reported disclosures. Oxford University Press 2019-10-23 /pmc/articles/PMC6810549/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofz360.267 Text en © The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial reproduction and distribution of the work, in any medium, provided the original work is not altered or transformed in any way, and that the work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Abstracts
Gerges, Jessica
Raja, Karan
Patel, Mitesh
Patel, Ruben
Chen, Brandon
Philips, Mona
192. Augmenting Utility of Rapid Diagnostic Testing in Treatment of Gram-Negative Bacteremia with Stewardship Intervention
title 192. Augmenting Utility of Rapid Diagnostic Testing in Treatment of Gram-Negative Bacteremia with Stewardship Intervention
title_full 192. Augmenting Utility of Rapid Diagnostic Testing in Treatment of Gram-Negative Bacteremia with Stewardship Intervention
title_fullStr 192. Augmenting Utility of Rapid Diagnostic Testing in Treatment of Gram-Negative Bacteremia with Stewardship Intervention
title_full_unstemmed 192. Augmenting Utility of Rapid Diagnostic Testing in Treatment of Gram-Negative Bacteremia with Stewardship Intervention
title_short 192. Augmenting Utility of Rapid Diagnostic Testing in Treatment of Gram-Negative Bacteremia with Stewardship Intervention
title_sort 192. augmenting utility of rapid diagnostic testing in treatment of gram-negative bacteremia with stewardship intervention
topic Abstracts
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6810549/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofz360.267
work_keys_str_mv AT gergesjessica 192augmentingutilityofrapiddiagnostictestingintreatmentofgramnegativebacteremiawithstewardshipintervention
AT rajakaran 192augmentingutilityofrapiddiagnostictestingintreatmentofgramnegativebacteremiawithstewardshipintervention
AT patelmitesh 192augmentingutilityofrapiddiagnostictestingintreatmentofgramnegativebacteremiawithstewardshipintervention
AT patelruben 192augmentingutilityofrapiddiagnostictestingintreatmentofgramnegativebacteremiawithstewardshipintervention
AT chenbrandon 192augmentingutilityofrapiddiagnostictestingintreatmentofgramnegativebacteremiawithstewardshipintervention
AT philipsmona 192augmentingutilityofrapiddiagnostictestingintreatmentofgramnegativebacteremiawithstewardshipintervention