Cargando…

161. Evaluating the Predictive Value of Blood Culture Bottle Reporting for Coagulase Negative Staphylococci-Positive Cultures: Assessing Contamination vs. True Bacteremia

BACKGROUND: Coagulase-negative staphylococci (CoNS) are common blood culture (BCx) contaminants, but can also be causes of true blood stream infection (BSI). As a result, the clinical interpretation of CoNS positive BCx poses a significant challenge for providers and drives unnecessary antibiotic us...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bailey, Pamela, Doern, Christopher
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6810588/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofz360.236
_version_ 1783462291507773440
author Bailey, Pamela
Doern, Christopher
author_facet Bailey, Pamela
Doern, Christopher
author_sort Bailey, Pamela
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Coagulase-negative staphylococci (CoNS) are common blood culture (BCx) contaminants, but can also be causes of true blood stream infection (BSI). As a result, the clinical interpretation of CoNS positive BCx poses a significant challenge for providers and drives unnecessary antibiotic use, extended lengths of stay, and increased hospital costs. Despite these challenges, little is known about whether the number of positive BCx bottles within a set can be used to predict contamination vs. true BSI. METHODS: This study was conducted in an 865-bed tertiary care academic medical center in Richmond, VA. A retrospective chart review of CoNS-positive BCx from October to December 2018 was performed. Data collection included patient demographics, number of positive bottles within a set (i.e., were 1 or 2 bottles positive), care setting, antibiotic use, clinical judgement of contamination, and additional workup following the positive BCx result. Polymicrobic BCx were excluded. RESULTS: 50 patients (mean age 58.2 years, 60% male) with CoNS-positive BCx were included in this study. Forty (80%) of the cultures had only 1 of 2 BCx bottles positive within a set. 10 (20%) were positive from both bottles in the set. All patients were drawn in the Emergency Department and 90% were subsequently admitted to the hospital. Upon chart review, 47 (94%) and 3 (6%) of cultures were considered to be contaminants and real BSI, respectively. Of those judged to be contaminants, 10 (20%) were positive in both bottles within a set, and thus falsely suggested true BSI. Of the 3 judged to be true BSI, 2 (66%) were positive in 1 out of 2 bottles, and thus falsely suggested contamination. 42 (84%) patients had repeat BCx drawn following the initial positive culture, and 26 (52%) were continued on IV antibiotics. Forty (80%) of the cultures were judged contaminants by the primary medical service, and 77% stopped antibiotics (20/26) when CoNS was identified. CONCLUSION: These data show that reporting the number of bottles which are positive within a set provides misleading information and should not be used to determine whether a culture result represents contamination or true BSI. DISCLOSURES: All authors: No reported disclosures.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6810588
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-68105882019-10-28 161. Evaluating the Predictive Value of Blood Culture Bottle Reporting for Coagulase Negative Staphylococci-Positive Cultures: Assessing Contamination vs. True Bacteremia Bailey, Pamela Doern, Christopher Open Forum Infect Dis Abstracts BACKGROUND: Coagulase-negative staphylococci (CoNS) are common blood culture (BCx) contaminants, but can also be causes of true blood stream infection (BSI). As a result, the clinical interpretation of CoNS positive BCx poses a significant challenge for providers and drives unnecessary antibiotic use, extended lengths of stay, and increased hospital costs. Despite these challenges, little is known about whether the number of positive BCx bottles within a set can be used to predict contamination vs. true BSI. METHODS: This study was conducted in an 865-bed tertiary care academic medical center in Richmond, VA. A retrospective chart review of CoNS-positive BCx from October to December 2018 was performed. Data collection included patient demographics, number of positive bottles within a set (i.e., were 1 or 2 bottles positive), care setting, antibiotic use, clinical judgement of contamination, and additional workup following the positive BCx result. Polymicrobic BCx were excluded. RESULTS: 50 patients (mean age 58.2 years, 60% male) with CoNS-positive BCx were included in this study. Forty (80%) of the cultures had only 1 of 2 BCx bottles positive within a set. 10 (20%) were positive from both bottles in the set. All patients were drawn in the Emergency Department and 90% were subsequently admitted to the hospital. Upon chart review, 47 (94%) and 3 (6%) of cultures were considered to be contaminants and real BSI, respectively. Of those judged to be contaminants, 10 (20%) were positive in both bottles within a set, and thus falsely suggested true BSI. Of the 3 judged to be true BSI, 2 (66%) were positive in 1 out of 2 bottles, and thus falsely suggested contamination. 42 (84%) patients had repeat BCx drawn following the initial positive culture, and 26 (52%) were continued on IV antibiotics. Forty (80%) of the cultures were judged contaminants by the primary medical service, and 77% stopped antibiotics (20/26) when CoNS was identified. CONCLUSION: These data show that reporting the number of bottles which are positive within a set provides misleading information and should not be used to determine whether a culture result represents contamination or true BSI. DISCLOSURES: All authors: No reported disclosures. Oxford University Press 2019-10-23 /pmc/articles/PMC6810588/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofz360.236 Text en © The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial reproduction and distribution of the work, in any medium, provided the original work is not altered or transformed in any way, and that the work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Abstracts
Bailey, Pamela
Doern, Christopher
161. Evaluating the Predictive Value of Blood Culture Bottle Reporting for Coagulase Negative Staphylococci-Positive Cultures: Assessing Contamination vs. True Bacteremia
title 161. Evaluating the Predictive Value of Blood Culture Bottle Reporting for Coagulase Negative Staphylococci-Positive Cultures: Assessing Contamination vs. True Bacteremia
title_full 161. Evaluating the Predictive Value of Blood Culture Bottle Reporting for Coagulase Negative Staphylococci-Positive Cultures: Assessing Contamination vs. True Bacteremia
title_fullStr 161. Evaluating the Predictive Value of Blood Culture Bottle Reporting for Coagulase Negative Staphylococci-Positive Cultures: Assessing Contamination vs. True Bacteremia
title_full_unstemmed 161. Evaluating the Predictive Value of Blood Culture Bottle Reporting for Coagulase Negative Staphylococci-Positive Cultures: Assessing Contamination vs. True Bacteremia
title_short 161. Evaluating the Predictive Value of Blood Culture Bottle Reporting for Coagulase Negative Staphylococci-Positive Cultures: Assessing Contamination vs. True Bacteremia
title_sort 161. evaluating the predictive value of blood culture bottle reporting for coagulase negative staphylococci-positive cultures: assessing contamination vs. true bacteremia
topic Abstracts
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6810588/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofz360.236
work_keys_str_mv AT baileypamela 161evaluatingthepredictivevalueofbloodculturebottlereportingforcoagulasenegativestaphylococcipositiveculturesassessingcontaminationvstruebacteremia
AT doernchristopher 161evaluatingthepredictivevalueofbloodculturebottlereportingforcoagulasenegativestaphylococcipositiveculturesassessingcontaminationvstruebacteremia