Cargando…
2266. Management of Ertapenem-Resistant, Meropenem-Susceptible Enterobacteriaceae
BACKGROUND: Carbapenemases are the most frequent mechanism of carbapenem resistance in Enterobacteriaceae. However, alternative mechanisms such as loss of porin channels or up-regulation of efflux pumps can cause intermediate- to high-level resistance to ertapenem (ERTA) and possibly reduced suscept...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6810591/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofz360.1944 |
_version_ | 1783462292247019520 |
---|---|
author | Srinivas, Pavithra Wu, Janet Neuner, Elizabeth A Pallotta, Andrea Richter, Sandra S Tsigrelis, Constantine |
author_facet | Srinivas, Pavithra Wu, Janet Neuner, Elizabeth A Pallotta, Andrea Richter, Sandra S Tsigrelis, Constantine |
author_sort | Srinivas, Pavithra |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Carbapenemases are the most frequent mechanism of carbapenem resistance in Enterobacteriaceae. However, alternative mechanisms such as loss of porin channels or up-regulation of efflux pumps can cause intermediate- to high-level resistance to ertapenem (ERTA) and possibly reduced susceptibilities to meropenem (MERO) leading to discordant phenotypic profiles. Clinical implications of discordant carbapenem susceptibilities and optimal therapy options are yet unknown. We sought to describe our experience with carbapenem-discordant Enterobacteriaceae (CDE). METHODS: Descriptive study of hospitalized adult patients with a CDE positive culture from December 1/16 - December 1/18. Discordance was defined as Enterobacteriaceae with an ERTA-resistant and MERO-susceptible phenotype. Primary objective was to describe antibiotic use patterns for CDE infections. Secondary outcomes included infectious diseases (ID) involvement and clinical outcomes. Clinical failure was defined as a composite of in-hospital mortality, switch of definitive therapy due to clinical worsening, re-hospitalization within 30 days for re-infection, or failure to achieve blood culture clearance for ≥7 days. RESULTS: A total of 55 patients with CDE were identified. Most common organisms were Enterobacter cloacae complex (72%) and Klebsiella pneumoniae (9%). Of 21 isolates tested, 1 (4.8%) was positive for a carbapenemase. Mean age of patients was 61 ± 16 years, 51% were admitted to a medicine service, and 18% were immunocompromised. ID was involved in 82% of CDE cases. Most common sites were urine (33%), wound/tissue (27%), and respiratory (18%). 43/55 (78%) patients were treated – 17/43 (40%) with MERO, 14/43 (33%) with fluoroquinolones. Ceftazidime/avibactam and tigecycline were used in 4 (9%) patients each. Combination therapy was used in 8 (19%) patients, most commonly with MERO or tigecycline. Clinical failure occurred in 21/43 (49%) patients – 8/43 (19%) were receiving MERO-based therapy, 13/43 (30%) were receiving a non-MERO-based therapy. CONCLUSION: Discordance between ERTA and MERO susceptibility was more common in Enterobacter spp. Majority of isolates tested negative for a carbapenemase. MERO and fluoroquinolones were the most frequently used antibiotics for treatment of CDE infections. DISCLOSURES: All authors: No reported disclosures. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6810591 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-68105912019-10-28 2266. Management of Ertapenem-Resistant, Meropenem-Susceptible Enterobacteriaceae Srinivas, Pavithra Wu, Janet Neuner, Elizabeth A Pallotta, Andrea Richter, Sandra S Tsigrelis, Constantine Open Forum Infect Dis Abstracts BACKGROUND: Carbapenemases are the most frequent mechanism of carbapenem resistance in Enterobacteriaceae. However, alternative mechanisms such as loss of porin channels or up-regulation of efflux pumps can cause intermediate- to high-level resistance to ertapenem (ERTA) and possibly reduced susceptibilities to meropenem (MERO) leading to discordant phenotypic profiles. Clinical implications of discordant carbapenem susceptibilities and optimal therapy options are yet unknown. We sought to describe our experience with carbapenem-discordant Enterobacteriaceae (CDE). METHODS: Descriptive study of hospitalized adult patients with a CDE positive culture from December 1/16 - December 1/18. Discordance was defined as Enterobacteriaceae with an ERTA-resistant and MERO-susceptible phenotype. Primary objective was to describe antibiotic use patterns for CDE infections. Secondary outcomes included infectious diseases (ID) involvement and clinical outcomes. Clinical failure was defined as a composite of in-hospital mortality, switch of definitive therapy due to clinical worsening, re-hospitalization within 30 days for re-infection, or failure to achieve blood culture clearance for ≥7 days. RESULTS: A total of 55 patients with CDE were identified. Most common organisms were Enterobacter cloacae complex (72%) and Klebsiella pneumoniae (9%). Of 21 isolates tested, 1 (4.8%) was positive for a carbapenemase. Mean age of patients was 61 ± 16 years, 51% were admitted to a medicine service, and 18% were immunocompromised. ID was involved in 82% of CDE cases. Most common sites were urine (33%), wound/tissue (27%), and respiratory (18%). 43/55 (78%) patients were treated – 17/43 (40%) with MERO, 14/43 (33%) with fluoroquinolones. Ceftazidime/avibactam and tigecycline were used in 4 (9%) patients each. Combination therapy was used in 8 (19%) patients, most commonly with MERO or tigecycline. Clinical failure occurred in 21/43 (49%) patients – 8/43 (19%) were receiving MERO-based therapy, 13/43 (30%) were receiving a non-MERO-based therapy. CONCLUSION: Discordance between ERTA and MERO susceptibility was more common in Enterobacter spp. Majority of isolates tested negative for a carbapenemase. MERO and fluoroquinolones were the most frequently used antibiotics for treatment of CDE infections. DISCLOSURES: All authors: No reported disclosures. Oxford University Press 2019-10-23 /pmc/articles/PMC6810591/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofz360.1944 Text en © The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial reproduction and distribution of the work, in any medium, provided the original work is not altered or transformed in any way, and that the work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com |
spellingShingle | Abstracts Srinivas, Pavithra Wu, Janet Neuner, Elizabeth A Pallotta, Andrea Richter, Sandra S Tsigrelis, Constantine 2266. Management of Ertapenem-Resistant, Meropenem-Susceptible Enterobacteriaceae |
title | 2266. Management of Ertapenem-Resistant, Meropenem-Susceptible Enterobacteriaceae |
title_full | 2266. Management of Ertapenem-Resistant, Meropenem-Susceptible Enterobacteriaceae |
title_fullStr | 2266. Management of Ertapenem-Resistant, Meropenem-Susceptible Enterobacteriaceae |
title_full_unstemmed | 2266. Management of Ertapenem-Resistant, Meropenem-Susceptible Enterobacteriaceae |
title_short | 2266. Management of Ertapenem-Resistant, Meropenem-Susceptible Enterobacteriaceae |
title_sort | 2266. management of ertapenem-resistant, meropenem-susceptible enterobacteriaceae |
topic | Abstracts |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6810591/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofz360.1944 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT srinivaspavithra 2266managementofertapenemresistantmeropenemsusceptibleenterobacteriaceae AT wujanet 2266managementofertapenemresistantmeropenemsusceptibleenterobacteriaceae AT neunerelizabetha 2266managementofertapenemresistantmeropenemsusceptibleenterobacteriaceae AT pallottaandrea 2266managementofertapenemresistantmeropenemsusceptibleenterobacteriaceae AT richtersandras 2266managementofertapenemresistantmeropenemsusceptibleenterobacteriaceae AT tsigrelisconstantine 2266managementofertapenemresistantmeropenemsusceptibleenterobacteriaceae |