Cargando…

150. Urinary Tract-Associated Gram-Negative Bacteremia: Impact of Treatment Duration

BACKGROUND: Gram-negative bloodstream infections are one of the leading causes of death in the United States. A select number of studies have been conducted evaluating various treatment durations; however, none have specifically focused on urinary sources. The purpose of this study was to compare th...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Badwal, Jasmin K, Hand, Elizabeth O, Lyons, John M, Traugott, Kristi A
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6810618/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofz360.225
_version_ 1783462296431886336
author Badwal, Jasmin K
Hand, Elizabeth O
Lyons, John M
Traugott, Kristi A
author_facet Badwal, Jasmin K
Hand, Elizabeth O
Lyons, John M
Traugott, Kristi A
author_sort Badwal, Jasmin K
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Gram-negative bloodstream infections are one of the leading causes of death in the United States. A select number of studies have been conducted evaluating various treatment durations; however, none have specifically focused on urinary sources. The purpose of this study was to compare the effect of short vs. long course of antimicrobial therapy on clinical and microbiological outcomes for urinary tract-associated gram-negative bacteremia (GNB). METHODS: This was a single-center, retrospective review from January 2016 to October 2018. Subjects were screened using a report of all positive GNB cultures. Hospitalized patients ≥18 years of age were included if they had a bacteremia from a urinary source and received an intravenous or a highly bioavailable oral agent for ≥7 days. Patients were excluded due to pregnancy, incarceration, inappropriate definitive therapy, polymicrobial bacteremia, unaddressed source control issues, or death during the treatment course. Short course (SC) was defined as 7–10 days, while long course (LC) was defined as >10 days. The primary composite outcome of treatment failure included both 30-day all-cause mortality and 90-day recurrence. Secondary outcomes included 30-day re-admission, 90-day mortality, resistance development, and C. difficile infection. RESULTS: A total of 207 patients were included: 45 patients received SC and 162 received LC. Both groups were similar at baseline in terms of comorbidities, intensive care unit (ICU) admission, and vasopressor initiation. No statistically significant difference in the primary composite endpoint was observed: 2/45 (4.4%) SC vs. LC 10/162 (6.2%), P = 0.66. There was also no difference in other secondary outcomes. CONCLUSION: Consistent with prior studies, we were unable to find a significant difference in clinical failure rates between SC vs. LC for treatment of urinary tract-associated GNB. Generalizability to more complicated cases including those with inadequate source control may be limited; however, these data add to the body of literature supporting the use of shorter antibiotic durations. DISCLOSURES: All authors: No reported disclosures.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6810618
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-68106182019-10-28 150. Urinary Tract-Associated Gram-Negative Bacteremia: Impact of Treatment Duration Badwal, Jasmin K Hand, Elizabeth O Lyons, John M Traugott, Kristi A Open Forum Infect Dis Abstracts BACKGROUND: Gram-negative bloodstream infections are one of the leading causes of death in the United States. A select number of studies have been conducted evaluating various treatment durations; however, none have specifically focused on urinary sources. The purpose of this study was to compare the effect of short vs. long course of antimicrobial therapy on clinical and microbiological outcomes for urinary tract-associated gram-negative bacteremia (GNB). METHODS: This was a single-center, retrospective review from January 2016 to October 2018. Subjects were screened using a report of all positive GNB cultures. Hospitalized patients ≥18 years of age were included if they had a bacteremia from a urinary source and received an intravenous or a highly bioavailable oral agent for ≥7 days. Patients were excluded due to pregnancy, incarceration, inappropriate definitive therapy, polymicrobial bacteremia, unaddressed source control issues, or death during the treatment course. Short course (SC) was defined as 7–10 days, while long course (LC) was defined as >10 days. The primary composite outcome of treatment failure included both 30-day all-cause mortality and 90-day recurrence. Secondary outcomes included 30-day re-admission, 90-day mortality, resistance development, and C. difficile infection. RESULTS: A total of 207 patients were included: 45 patients received SC and 162 received LC. Both groups were similar at baseline in terms of comorbidities, intensive care unit (ICU) admission, and vasopressor initiation. No statistically significant difference in the primary composite endpoint was observed: 2/45 (4.4%) SC vs. LC 10/162 (6.2%), P = 0.66. There was also no difference in other secondary outcomes. CONCLUSION: Consistent with prior studies, we were unable to find a significant difference in clinical failure rates between SC vs. LC for treatment of urinary tract-associated GNB. Generalizability to more complicated cases including those with inadequate source control may be limited; however, these data add to the body of literature supporting the use of shorter antibiotic durations. DISCLOSURES: All authors: No reported disclosures. Oxford University Press 2019-10-23 /pmc/articles/PMC6810618/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofz360.225 Text en © The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial reproduction and distribution of the work, in any medium, provided the original work is not altered or transformed in any way, and that the work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Abstracts
Badwal, Jasmin K
Hand, Elizabeth O
Lyons, John M
Traugott, Kristi A
150. Urinary Tract-Associated Gram-Negative Bacteremia: Impact of Treatment Duration
title 150. Urinary Tract-Associated Gram-Negative Bacteremia: Impact of Treatment Duration
title_full 150. Urinary Tract-Associated Gram-Negative Bacteremia: Impact of Treatment Duration
title_fullStr 150. Urinary Tract-Associated Gram-Negative Bacteremia: Impact of Treatment Duration
title_full_unstemmed 150. Urinary Tract-Associated Gram-Negative Bacteremia: Impact of Treatment Duration
title_short 150. Urinary Tract-Associated Gram-Negative Bacteremia: Impact of Treatment Duration
title_sort 150. urinary tract-associated gram-negative bacteremia: impact of treatment duration
topic Abstracts
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6810618/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofz360.225
work_keys_str_mv AT badwaljasmink 150urinarytractassociatedgramnegativebacteremiaimpactoftreatmentduration
AT handelizabetho 150urinarytractassociatedgramnegativebacteremiaimpactoftreatmentduration
AT lyonsjohnm 150urinarytractassociatedgramnegativebacteremiaimpactoftreatmentduration
AT traugottkristia 150urinarytractassociatedgramnegativebacteremiaimpactoftreatmentduration