Cargando…

1591. Updated Fluoroquinolone MIC Breakpoints: Impact on Susceptibility Rates in the United States

BACKGROUND: In 2015 USCAST, the National Advisory Committee for the United States (US) to EUCAST, produced a report (Version 1.0) on their website (www.uscast.org) re-evaluating fluoroquinolone (FQ) breakpoint interpretive criteria (IC) based on analysis of current microbiology and pharmacokinetic/p...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Flamm, Robert K, Pfaller, Michael A, Ambrose, Paul G, Andes, David, Bradley, John S, Bhavnani, Sujata M, Jones, Ronald N
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6810624/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofz360.1455
_version_ 1783462297952321536
author Flamm, Robert K
Pfaller, Michael A
Ambrose, Paul G
Andes, David
Bradley, John S
Bhavnani, Sujata M
Jones, Ronald N
author_facet Flamm, Robert K
Pfaller, Michael A
Ambrose, Paul G
Andes, David
Bradley, John S
Bhavnani, Sujata M
Jones, Ronald N
author_sort Flamm, Robert K
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: In 2015 USCAST, the National Advisory Committee for the United States (US) to EUCAST, produced a report (Version 1.0) on their website (www.uscast.org) re-evaluating fluoroquinolone (FQ) breakpoint interpretive criteria (IC) based on analysis of current microbiology and pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) data. EUCAST initiated a consultative process using USCAST analyses in an effort to update FQ IC, released in 2017. CLSI formed an ad-hoc working group in late 2015 to review the USCAST FQ document and formulate questions about content. In 2018, USCAST released V1.3 of the FQ document and CLSI subsequently published updated FQ MIC IC in the M100-S29 (2019) document. This study evaluated the impact on susceptibility (S) rates for US surveillance data that these IC changes created. METHODS: Clinical isolates (reference broth microdilution MIC) from 2016–2018 US SENTRY Program were analyzed for S based on current and previous IC. FQ results for ciprofloxacin (CIP), levofloxacin (LEV), and moxifloxacin (MOX) were evaluated. Benchmark S comparison data for meropenem, cefepime, piperacillin–tazobactam and delafloxacin (new FQ) were also included. RESULTS: S rates for Enterobacteriaceae (ENT;Figure) were reduced by 3.8/3.7% for CIP/LEV (CLSI) and 2.3/2.5% (EUCAST). MOX-S rate vs. ENT declined 5.7% (EUCAST). Although reductions in S occurred for most organism groups, K. pneumoniae (6.0/5.5% for CIP/LEV [CLSI] and 4.0/4.2% [EUCAST]) and S. marcescens (7.4/4.1% for CIP/LEV [CLSI] and 4.1/5.0% [EUCAST]) reductions were among the largest changes. For Pseudomonas aeruginosa (PSA), CIP-S decreased 6.8% and LEV-S 10.1% (CLSI); but potential for false-S results remain using CLSI IC (5 pathogens). CONCLUSION: USCAST’s comprehensive analyses of FQ IC in 2015 led to revised breakpoints for most organism/drug combinations among ENT and PSA compared with those being used before. USCAST analysis was most influenced by PK/PD in vivo data as current clinical outcomes data by MIC was limited. Awareness and interactions (both formal and informal) among breakpoint setting organizations has modified FQ ICs which are lower than previously recommended, and although not perfectly harmonized in time and detail, this represents a successful model. [Image: see text] DISCLOSURES: All authors: No reported disclosures.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6810624
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-68106242019-10-28 1591. Updated Fluoroquinolone MIC Breakpoints: Impact on Susceptibility Rates in the United States Flamm, Robert K Pfaller, Michael A Ambrose, Paul G Andes, David Bradley, John S Bhavnani, Sujata M Jones, Ronald N Open Forum Infect Dis Abstracts BACKGROUND: In 2015 USCAST, the National Advisory Committee for the United States (US) to EUCAST, produced a report (Version 1.0) on their website (www.uscast.org) re-evaluating fluoroquinolone (FQ) breakpoint interpretive criteria (IC) based on analysis of current microbiology and pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) data. EUCAST initiated a consultative process using USCAST analyses in an effort to update FQ IC, released in 2017. CLSI formed an ad-hoc working group in late 2015 to review the USCAST FQ document and formulate questions about content. In 2018, USCAST released V1.3 of the FQ document and CLSI subsequently published updated FQ MIC IC in the M100-S29 (2019) document. This study evaluated the impact on susceptibility (S) rates for US surveillance data that these IC changes created. METHODS: Clinical isolates (reference broth microdilution MIC) from 2016–2018 US SENTRY Program were analyzed for S based on current and previous IC. FQ results for ciprofloxacin (CIP), levofloxacin (LEV), and moxifloxacin (MOX) were evaluated. Benchmark S comparison data for meropenem, cefepime, piperacillin–tazobactam and delafloxacin (new FQ) were also included. RESULTS: S rates for Enterobacteriaceae (ENT;Figure) were reduced by 3.8/3.7% for CIP/LEV (CLSI) and 2.3/2.5% (EUCAST). MOX-S rate vs. ENT declined 5.7% (EUCAST). Although reductions in S occurred for most organism groups, K. pneumoniae (6.0/5.5% for CIP/LEV [CLSI] and 4.0/4.2% [EUCAST]) and S. marcescens (7.4/4.1% for CIP/LEV [CLSI] and 4.1/5.0% [EUCAST]) reductions were among the largest changes. For Pseudomonas aeruginosa (PSA), CIP-S decreased 6.8% and LEV-S 10.1% (CLSI); but potential for false-S results remain using CLSI IC (5 pathogens). CONCLUSION: USCAST’s comprehensive analyses of FQ IC in 2015 led to revised breakpoints for most organism/drug combinations among ENT and PSA compared with those being used before. USCAST analysis was most influenced by PK/PD in vivo data as current clinical outcomes data by MIC was limited. Awareness and interactions (both formal and informal) among breakpoint setting organizations has modified FQ ICs which are lower than previously recommended, and although not perfectly harmonized in time and detail, this represents a successful model. [Image: see text] DISCLOSURES: All authors: No reported disclosures. Oxford University Press 2019-10-23 /pmc/articles/PMC6810624/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofz360.1455 Text en © The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial reproduction and distribution of the work, in any medium, provided the original work is not altered or transformed in any way, and that the work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Abstracts
Flamm, Robert K
Pfaller, Michael A
Ambrose, Paul G
Andes, David
Bradley, John S
Bhavnani, Sujata M
Jones, Ronald N
1591. Updated Fluoroquinolone MIC Breakpoints: Impact on Susceptibility Rates in the United States
title 1591. Updated Fluoroquinolone MIC Breakpoints: Impact on Susceptibility Rates in the United States
title_full 1591. Updated Fluoroquinolone MIC Breakpoints: Impact on Susceptibility Rates in the United States
title_fullStr 1591. Updated Fluoroquinolone MIC Breakpoints: Impact on Susceptibility Rates in the United States
title_full_unstemmed 1591. Updated Fluoroquinolone MIC Breakpoints: Impact on Susceptibility Rates in the United States
title_short 1591. Updated Fluoroquinolone MIC Breakpoints: Impact on Susceptibility Rates in the United States
title_sort 1591. updated fluoroquinolone mic breakpoints: impact on susceptibility rates in the united states
topic Abstracts
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6810624/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofz360.1455
work_keys_str_mv AT flammrobertk 1591updatedfluoroquinolonemicbreakpointsimpactonsusceptibilityratesintheunitedstates
AT pfallermichaela 1591updatedfluoroquinolonemicbreakpointsimpactonsusceptibilityratesintheunitedstates
AT ambrosepaulg 1591updatedfluoroquinolonemicbreakpointsimpactonsusceptibilityratesintheunitedstates
AT andesdavid 1591updatedfluoroquinolonemicbreakpointsimpactonsusceptibilityratesintheunitedstates
AT bradleyjohns 1591updatedfluoroquinolonemicbreakpointsimpactonsusceptibilityratesintheunitedstates
AT bhavnanisujatam 1591updatedfluoroquinolonemicbreakpointsimpactonsusceptibilityratesintheunitedstates
AT jonesronaldn 1591updatedfluoroquinolonemicbreakpointsimpactonsusceptibilityratesintheunitedstates