Cargando…

2687. Extended Infusions of Piperacillin/Tazobactam vs. Cefepime for Empiric Treatment of Neutropenic Fever

BACKGROUND: In neutropenic patients, a fever may be the only indication of a severe underlying infection. According to the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines, for high-risk patients, monotherapy with an anti-pseudomonal β-lactam agent should be initiated. NCCN states emerging da...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Norman, Sarah, Henshaw, Laura, Reeves, David, Moore, Sarah, Cheatham, S Christian
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6810686/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofz360.2364
_version_ 1783462308330078208
author Norman, Sarah
Henshaw, Laura
Reeves, David
Moore, Sarah
Cheatham, S Christian
author_facet Norman, Sarah
Henshaw, Laura
Reeves, David
Moore, Sarah
Cheatham, S Christian
author_sort Norman, Sarah
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: In neutropenic patients, a fever may be the only indication of a severe underlying infection. According to the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines, for high-risk patients, monotherapy with an anti-pseudomonal β-lactam agent should be initiated. NCCN states emerging data may support extended or continuous infusions of β-lactam therapies; however, preference is not given for cefepime or piperacillin/tazobactam. The objective of this study was to compare the outcomes of extended infusions of piperacillin/tazobactam vs. cefepime for the empiric treatment of neutropenic fever. METHODS: This retrospective, single-center cohort study included patients ≥18 years with an absolute neutrophil count (ANC) less than 500 cells/mm(3), single oral temperature measurement ≥38.3°C or ≥38°C sustained over 1 hour period and admitted to a bone marrow transplant unit. Patients received extended infusion piperacillin/tazobactam or cefepime as initial antibiotic therapy for at least 48 hours between January 1, 2015 and September 1, 2018. The primary outcome was time to defervescence in hours. Secondary outcomes included time to defervescence and no acetaminophen use within 8 hours, defervescence by 72 hours, hospital length of stay, clinical failure, in-hospital mortality, and acute kidney injury. RESULTS: 73 patients were included in this study (36 received piperacillin/tazobactam and 37 received cefepime). The primary outcome of median time to defervescence was 31.8 hours in the piperacillin/tazobactam group and 25 hours in the cefepime group (P = 0.26). Secondary outcomes in the piperacillin/tazobactam group compared with cefepime, respectively included median time to defervescence and no acetaminophen use: 43 vs. 35 hours (P = 0.16), defervescence by 72 hours: 66.7% vs. 91.9% (P = 0.01), median hospital length of stay 28 vs. 22 days (P = 0.04), clinical failure 22.2% vs. 24.3% (P = 0.83), in-hospital mortality 8.3% vs. 2.8% (P = 0.36), rate of acute kidney injury: 50% vs. 24.3% (P = 0.02). CONCLUSION: These findings suggest there is no difference in time to defervescence between extended infusions of piperacillin/tazobactam compared with extended infusions of cefepime for the empiric treatment of neutropenic fever. DISCLOSURES: All authors: No reported disclosures.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6810686
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-68106862019-10-28 2687. Extended Infusions of Piperacillin/Tazobactam vs. Cefepime for Empiric Treatment of Neutropenic Fever Norman, Sarah Henshaw, Laura Reeves, David Moore, Sarah Cheatham, S Christian Open Forum Infect Dis Abstracts BACKGROUND: In neutropenic patients, a fever may be the only indication of a severe underlying infection. According to the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines, for high-risk patients, monotherapy with an anti-pseudomonal β-lactam agent should be initiated. NCCN states emerging data may support extended or continuous infusions of β-lactam therapies; however, preference is not given for cefepime or piperacillin/tazobactam. The objective of this study was to compare the outcomes of extended infusions of piperacillin/tazobactam vs. cefepime for the empiric treatment of neutropenic fever. METHODS: This retrospective, single-center cohort study included patients ≥18 years with an absolute neutrophil count (ANC) less than 500 cells/mm(3), single oral temperature measurement ≥38.3°C or ≥38°C sustained over 1 hour period and admitted to a bone marrow transplant unit. Patients received extended infusion piperacillin/tazobactam or cefepime as initial antibiotic therapy for at least 48 hours between January 1, 2015 and September 1, 2018. The primary outcome was time to defervescence in hours. Secondary outcomes included time to defervescence and no acetaminophen use within 8 hours, defervescence by 72 hours, hospital length of stay, clinical failure, in-hospital mortality, and acute kidney injury. RESULTS: 73 patients were included in this study (36 received piperacillin/tazobactam and 37 received cefepime). The primary outcome of median time to defervescence was 31.8 hours in the piperacillin/tazobactam group and 25 hours in the cefepime group (P = 0.26). Secondary outcomes in the piperacillin/tazobactam group compared with cefepime, respectively included median time to defervescence and no acetaminophen use: 43 vs. 35 hours (P = 0.16), defervescence by 72 hours: 66.7% vs. 91.9% (P = 0.01), median hospital length of stay 28 vs. 22 days (P = 0.04), clinical failure 22.2% vs. 24.3% (P = 0.83), in-hospital mortality 8.3% vs. 2.8% (P = 0.36), rate of acute kidney injury: 50% vs. 24.3% (P = 0.02). CONCLUSION: These findings suggest there is no difference in time to defervescence between extended infusions of piperacillin/tazobactam compared with extended infusions of cefepime for the empiric treatment of neutropenic fever. DISCLOSURES: All authors: No reported disclosures. Oxford University Press 2019-10-23 /pmc/articles/PMC6810686/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofz360.2364 Text en © The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial reproduction and distribution of the work, in any medium, provided the original work is not altered or transformed in any way, and that the work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Abstracts
Norman, Sarah
Henshaw, Laura
Reeves, David
Moore, Sarah
Cheatham, S Christian
2687. Extended Infusions of Piperacillin/Tazobactam vs. Cefepime for Empiric Treatment of Neutropenic Fever
title 2687. Extended Infusions of Piperacillin/Tazobactam vs. Cefepime for Empiric Treatment of Neutropenic Fever
title_full 2687. Extended Infusions of Piperacillin/Tazobactam vs. Cefepime for Empiric Treatment of Neutropenic Fever
title_fullStr 2687. Extended Infusions of Piperacillin/Tazobactam vs. Cefepime for Empiric Treatment of Neutropenic Fever
title_full_unstemmed 2687. Extended Infusions of Piperacillin/Tazobactam vs. Cefepime for Empiric Treatment of Neutropenic Fever
title_short 2687. Extended Infusions of Piperacillin/Tazobactam vs. Cefepime for Empiric Treatment of Neutropenic Fever
title_sort 2687. extended infusions of piperacillin/tazobactam vs. cefepime for empiric treatment of neutropenic fever
topic Abstracts
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6810686/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofz360.2364
work_keys_str_mv AT normansarah 2687extendedinfusionsofpiperacillintazobactamvscefepimeforempirictreatmentofneutropenicfever
AT henshawlaura 2687extendedinfusionsofpiperacillintazobactamvscefepimeforempirictreatmentofneutropenicfever
AT reevesdavid 2687extendedinfusionsofpiperacillintazobactamvscefepimeforempirictreatmentofneutropenicfever
AT mooresarah 2687extendedinfusionsofpiperacillintazobactamvscefepimeforempirictreatmentofneutropenicfever
AT cheathamschristian 2687extendedinfusionsofpiperacillintazobactamvscefepimeforempirictreatmentofneutropenicfever