Cargando…
2546. The Mentor Model: Improving Fellow-Level Transitions of Patient Care
BACKGROUND: Our infectious disease fellows rarely see follow-up patients. Yet longitudinal patient care teaches the fellow how to approach chronic illnesses, continued clinical decline, and adverse effects of antimicrobial therapy. Fellows at our institution typically rotate with a different faculty...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6810741/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofz360.2224 |
_version_ | 1783462318640726016 |
---|---|
author | Modi, Anita R Isada, Carlos M |
author_facet | Modi, Anita R Isada, Carlos M |
author_sort | Modi, Anita R |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Our infectious disease fellows rarely see follow-up patients. Yet longitudinal patient care teaches the fellow how to approach chronic illnesses, continued clinical decline, and adverse effects of antimicrobial therapy. Fellows at our institution typically rotate with a different faculty member every 1–2 weeks. Follow-up visits are scheduled with the faculty member. While this model exposes the fellow to a variety of cases and management styles, it limits fellow follow-up opportunities. We developed a model to solve this problem. METHODS: The Mentor Model involves 12-week blocks during which the fellow and a faculty member share the same schedule, facilitating fellow participation in post-discharge visits, re-consultations, and repeat outpatient appointments. We queried our electronic medical record for a list of all consult notes written by fellows during both Mentor Model and traditional (non-Mentor Model) blocks. The number of repeat encounters, or evaluations of an established patient, were tallied and divided by the number of total encounters to determine each fellow’s follow-up rate. This value was compared between Mentor Model and non-Mentor Model blocks. RESULTS: Historically, our fellows have reported 1–2 follow-ups each over the course of his or her training. Four first-year fellows rotated through two Mentor Model blocks totaling 23 weeks and several non-Mentor Model blocks totaling 14 weeks within the study period. Fellow follow-up rates ranged from 5–12% during non-Mentor Model blocks. One fellow demonstrated increased rates during the first Mentor Model block (5% vs. 9%) and three demonstrated increased rates during the second Mentor Model block (5–11% vs. 9–18%). The most encounters noted for a single patient was five. The majority of repeat encounters occurred in the outpatient setting. CONCLUSION: We describe a rotation model designed to improve continuity of patient care among first-year Infectious Disease fellows at our institution. Compared with our previous rotation schedule, the Mentor Model increased fellow follow-ups. Structural changes to promote longitudinal patient care experiences are described in outpatient-heavy training programs. Further interventions to improve fellow follow-up rates in all training programs are merited. [Image: see text] DISCLOSURES: All authors: No reported disclosures. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6810741 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-68107412019-10-28 2546. The Mentor Model: Improving Fellow-Level Transitions of Patient Care Modi, Anita R Isada, Carlos M Open Forum Infect Dis Abstracts BACKGROUND: Our infectious disease fellows rarely see follow-up patients. Yet longitudinal patient care teaches the fellow how to approach chronic illnesses, continued clinical decline, and adverse effects of antimicrobial therapy. Fellows at our institution typically rotate with a different faculty member every 1–2 weeks. Follow-up visits are scheduled with the faculty member. While this model exposes the fellow to a variety of cases and management styles, it limits fellow follow-up opportunities. We developed a model to solve this problem. METHODS: The Mentor Model involves 12-week blocks during which the fellow and a faculty member share the same schedule, facilitating fellow participation in post-discharge visits, re-consultations, and repeat outpatient appointments. We queried our electronic medical record for a list of all consult notes written by fellows during both Mentor Model and traditional (non-Mentor Model) blocks. The number of repeat encounters, or evaluations of an established patient, were tallied and divided by the number of total encounters to determine each fellow’s follow-up rate. This value was compared between Mentor Model and non-Mentor Model blocks. RESULTS: Historically, our fellows have reported 1–2 follow-ups each over the course of his or her training. Four first-year fellows rotated through two Mentor Model blocks totaling 23 weeks and several non-Mentor Model blocks totaling 14 weeks within the study period. Fellow follow-up rates ranged from 5–12% during non-Mentor Model blocks. One fellow demonstrated increased rates during the first Mentor Model block (5% vs. 9%) and three demonstrated increased rates during the second Mentor Model block (5–11% vs. 9–18%). The most encounters noted for a single patient was five. The majority of repeat encounters occurred in the outpatient setting. CONCLUSION: We describe a rotation model designed to improve continuity of patient care among first-year Infectious Disease fellows at our institution. Compared with our previous rotation schedule, the Mentor Model increased fellow follow-ups. Structural changes to promote longitudinal patient care experiences are described in outpatient-heavy training programs. Further interventions to improve fellow follow-up rates in all training programs are merited. [Image: see text] DISCLOSURES: All authors: No reported disclosures. Oxford University Press 2019-10-23 /pmc/articles/PMC6810741/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofz360.2224 Text en © The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial reproduction and distribution of the work, in any medium, provided the original work is not altered or transformed in any way, and that the work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com |
spellingShingle | Abstracts Modi, Anita R Isada, Carlos M 2546. The Mentor Model: Improving Fellow-Level Transitions of Patient Care |
title | 2546. The Mentor Model: Improving Fellow-Level Transitions of Patient Care |
title_full | 2546. The Mentor Model: Improving Fellow-Level Transitions of Patient Care |
title_fullStr | 2546. The Mentor Model: Improving Fellow-Level Transitions of Patient Care |
title_full_unstemmed | 2546. The Mentor Model: Improving Fellow-Level Transitions of Patient Care |
title_short | 2546. The Mentor Model: Improving Fellow-Level Transitions of Patient Care |
title_sort | 2546. the mentor model: improving fellow-level transitions of patient care |
topic | Abstracts |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6810741/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofz360.2224 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT modianitar 2546thementormodelimprovingfellowleveltransitionsofpatientcare AT isadacarlosm 2546thementormodelimprovingfellowleveltransitionsofpatientcare |