Cargando…

312. Treatment of Hepatitis C After Identification of Infection During Universal Screening Approach in Pregnant Women

BACKGROUND: Identifying asymptomatic individuals with hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection is challenging. Pregnancy presents a unique opportunity to screen women for HCV and then link those positive to care. Universal screening in pregnant women, however, is not recommended by CDC or ACOG. Further, tr...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rose, Michelle, Allen Myers, John, Ryan, Nicholas, Prince, Alissa, Talbot, Morgan, Espinosa, Claudia M
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6810746/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofz360.385
_version_ 1783462319275114496
author Rose, Michelle
Allen Myers, John
Ryan, Nicholas
Prince, Alissa
Talbot, Morgan
Espinosa, Claudia M
author_facet Rose, Michelle
Allen Myers, John
Ryan, Nicholas
Prince, Alissa
Talbot, Morgan
Espinosa, Claudia M
author_sort Rose, Michelle
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Identifying asymptomatic individuals with hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection is challenging. Pregnancy presents a unique opportunity to screen women for HCV and then link those positive to care. Universal screening in pregnant women, however, is not recommended by CDC or ACOG. Further, treatment with direct antiviral agents (DAAs) are not currently approved for pregnant women but are warranted following delivery and breastfeeding. We sought to compare treatment uptake before and after universal screening in pregnant women was implemented as the standard of care in our institution and then determine if universal screening leads to increased treatment after pregnancy. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of risk-based HCV screening in pregnant women was used for the first period (2014–2015) and a prospective design was used following 18 months of universal screening (2016–2017). Prenatal data were collected from all pregnant women that sought care at our institution in the prospective part of the study. We tested for differences in relevant outcomes (e.g., screening rates, rate of those eligible for treatment, and those who actually received treatment) between the two periods. Finally, we performed a cost-effective analysis of universal screening considering treatment rates. RESULTS: During the universal screening period, more women were screened for HCV and diagnosed with chronic infection. Universal screening was not associated with a significant increase in the odds of women receiving treatment after pregnancy. The increased cost for universal screening was $1060 per patient, resulting in an ICER of $219,391 per additional treatment received or $57,734 per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) gained, which is below the willingness-to-pay threshold to be cost-effective. Universal screening, however, is cost-effective with an ICER well below the established willingness-to-pay threshold of $100,000 per QALY gained, if all women eligible for treatment receive therapy. CONCLUSION: Universal screening may not lead to a significant increase in the odds that pregnant women receive DAAs therapy after pregnancy. Barriers to linkage to care should be addressed in an effort to increase antiviral therapy for these women and universal screening should be implemented within this patient population. [Image: see text] DISCLOSURES: All authors: No reported disclosures.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6810746
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-68107462019-10-28 312. Treatment of Hepatitis C After Identification of Infection During Universal Screening Approach in Pregnant Women Rose, Michelle Allen Myers, John Ryan, Nicholas Prince, Alissa Talbot, Morgan Espinosa, Claudia M Open Forum Infect Dis Abstracts BACKGROUND: Identifying asymptomatic individuals with hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection is challenging. Pregnancy presents a unique opportunity to screen women for HCV and then link those positive to care. Universal screening in pregnant women, however, is not recommended by CDC or ACOG. Further, treatment with direct antiviral agents (DAAs) are not currently approved for pregnant women but are warranted following delivery and breastfeeding. We sought to compare treatment uptake before and after universal screening in pregnant women was implemented as the standard of care in our institution and then determine if universal screening leads to increased treatment after pregnancy. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of risk-based HCV screening in pregnant women was used for the first period (2014–2015) and a prospective design was used following 18 months of universal screening (2016–2017). Prenatal data were collected from all pregnant women that sought care at our institution in the prospective part of the study. We tested for differences in relevant outcomes (e.g., screening rates, rate of those eligible for treatment, and those who actually received treatment) between the two periods. Finally, we performed a cost-effective analysis of universal screening considering treatment rates. RESULTS: During the universal screening period, more women were screened for HCV and diagnosed with chronic infection. Universal screening was not associated with a significant increase in the odds of women receiving treatment after pregnancy. The increased cost for universal screening was $1060 per patient, resulting in an ICER of $219,391 per additional treatment received or $57,734 per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) gained, which is below the willingness-to-pay threshold to be cost-effective. Universal screening, however, is cost-effective with an ICER well below the established willingness-to-pay threshold of $100,000 per QALY gained, if all women eligible for treatment receive therapy. CONCLUSION: Universal screening may not lead to a significant increase in the odds that pregnant women receive DAAs therapy after pregnancy. Barriers to linkage to care should be addressed in an effort to increase antiviral therapy for these women and universal screening should be implemented within this patient population. [Image: see text] DISCLOSURES: All authors: No reported disclosures. Oxford University Press 2019-10-23 /pmc/articles/PMC6810746/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofz360.385 Text en © The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial reproduction and distribution of the work, in any medium, provided the original work is not altered or transformed in any way, and that the work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Abstracts
Rose, Michelle
Allen Myers, John
Ryan, Nicholas
Prince, Alissa
Talbot, Morgan
Espinosa, Claudia M
312. Treatment of Hepatitis C After Identification of Infection During Universal Screening Approach in Pregnant Women
title 312. Treatment of Hepatitis C After Identification of Infection During Universal Screening Approach in Pregnant Women
title_full 312. Treatment of Hepatitis C After Identification of Infection During Universal Screening Approach in Pregnant Women
title_fullStr 312. Treatment of Hepatitis C After Identification of Infection During Universal Screening Approach in Pregnant Women
title_full_unstemmed 312. Treatment of Hepatitis C After Identification of Infection During Universal Screening Approach in Pregnant Women
title_short 312. Treatment of Hepatitis C After Identification of Infection During Universal Screening Approach in Pregnant Women
title_sort 312. treatment of hepatitis c after identification of infection during universal screening approach in pregnant women
topic Abstracts
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6810746/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofz360.385
work_keys_str_mv AT rosemichelle 312treatmentofhepatitiscafteridentificationofinfectionduringuniversalscreeningapproachinpregnantwomen
AT allenmyersjohn 312treatmentofhepatitiscafteridentificationofinfectionduringuniversalscreeningapproachinpregnantwomen
AT ryannicholas 312treatmentofhepatitiscafteridentificationofinfectionduringuniversalscreeningapproachinpregnantwomen
AT princealissa 312treatmentofhepatitiscafteridentificationofinfectionduringuniversalscreeningapproachinpregnantwomen
AT talbotmorgan 312treatmentofhepatitiscafteridentificationofinfectionduringuniversalscreeningapproachinpregnantwomen
AT espinosaclaudiam 312treatmentofhepatitiscafteridentificationofinfectionduringuniversalscreeningapproachinpregnantwomen