Cargando…
2355. The Association Between Diagnostic Testing Method and Clostridium difficile Infection Severity
BACKGROUND: The optimal diagnostic strategy for Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) is not known, and no test is shown to clearly differentiate colonization from symptomatic infection. We hypothesized that detection and/or quantification of stool toxins would associate with severe disease and adve...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6810784/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofz360.2033 |
_version_ | 1783462327278895104 |
---|---|
author | Menon, Anitha Perry, Donald A Motyka, Jonathan Weiner, Shayna Standke, Alexandra Penkevich, Aline Keidan, Micah Young, Vincent B Rao, Krishna |
author_facet | Menon, Anitha Perry, Donald A Motyka, Jonathan Weiner, Shayna Standke, Alexandra Penkevich, Aline Keidan, Micah Young, Vincent B Rao, Krishna |
author_sort | Menon, Anitha |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The optimal diagnostic strategy for Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) is not known, and no test is shown to clearly differentiate colonization from symptomatic infection. We hypothesized that detection and/or quantification of stool toxins would associate with severe disease and adverse outcomes. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study among subjects with CDI diagnosed in 2016 at the University of Michigan. The clinical microbiology laboratory tested for glutamate dehydrogenase antigen and toxins A/B by enzyme immunoassay (EIA). Discordant results reflexed to PCR for the tcdB gene. Stool toxin levels were quantified via a modified cell cytotoxicity assay (CCA). C. difficile was isolated by anaerobic culture and ribotyped. Severe CDI was defined by the IDSA criteria: white blood cell count >15,000 cells/µL or a 1.5-fold increase in serum creatinine above baseline. The primary outcomes were all-cause 30-day mortality and a composite of colectomy, ICU admission, and/or death attributable to CDI within 30 days. Analysis included standard bivariable tests and adjusted models via logistic regression. RESULTS: From 565 adult patients, we obtained 646 samples; 199 (30.8%) contained toxins by EIA. Toxin positivity associated with IDSA severity (Table 1), but not our primary outcomes on unadjusted analysis. After adjustment for putative confounders, we still did not observe an association between toxin positivity and our primary outcomes. Stool toxin levels by CCA >6.4 ng/mL associated with IDSA severity (Table 1), but not the primary outcomes. Compared with the period from 2010 to 2013, the circulating ribotypes of C. difficile at our institution changed in 2016. Notably ribotype 106 newly emerged, accounting for 10.6% of strains, and ribotype 027 fell to 9.3% (Table 2). The incidence of ribotype 014-027 has remained stable at 18.9%, but this strain was associated with both IDSA severity and 30-day mortality (OR = 3.32; P = 0.001). CONCLUSION: Toxin detection by EIA/CCA associated with IDSA severity, but this study was unable to confirm an association with subsequent adverse outcomes. The molecular epidemiology of C. difficile has shifted, and this may have implications for the optimal diagnostic strategy for CDI. [Image: see text] [Image: see text] DISCLOSURES: All authors: No reported disclosures. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6810784 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-68107842019-10-28 2355. The Association Between Diagnostic Testing Method and Clostridium difficile Infection Severity Menon, Anitha Perry, Donald A Motyka, Jonathan Weiner, Shayna Standke, Alexandra Penkevich, Aline Keidan, Micah Young, Vincent B Rao, Krishna Open Forum Infect Dis Abstracts BACKGROUND: The optimal diagnostic strategy for Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) is not known, and no test is shown to clearly differentiate colonization from symptomatic infection. We hypothesized that detection and/or quantification of stool toxins would associate with severe disease and adverse outcomes. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study among subjects with CDI diagnosed in 2016 at the University of Michigan. The clinical microbiology laboratory tested for glutamate dehydrogenase antigen and toxins A/B by enzyme immunoassay (EIA). Discordant results reflexed to PCR for the tcdB gene. Stool toxin levels were quantified via a modified cell cytotoxicity assay (CCA). C. difficile was isolated by anaerobic culture and ribotyped. Severe CDI was defined by the IDSA criteria: white blood cell count >15,000 cells/µL or a 1.5-fold increase in serum creatinine above baseline. The primary outcomes were all-cause 30-day mortality and a composite of colectomy, ICU admission, and/or death attributable to CDI within 30 days. Analysis included standard bivariable tests and adjusted models via logistic regression. RESULTS: From 565 adult patients, we obtained 646 samples; 199 (30.8%) contained toxins by EIA. Toxin positivity associated with IDSA severity (Table 1), but not our primary outcomes on unadjusted analysis. After adjustment for putative confounders, we still did not observe an association between toxin positivity and our primary outcomes. Stool toxin levels by CCA >6.4 ng/mL associated with IDSA severity (Table 1), but not the primary outcomes. Compared with the period from 2010 to 2013, the circulating ribotypes of C. difficile at our institution changed in 2016. Notably ribotype 106 newly emerged, accounting for 10.6% of strains, and ribotype 027 fell to 9.3% (Table 2). The incidence of ribotype 014-027 has remained stable at 18.9%, but this strain was associated with both IDSA severity and 30-day mortality (OR = 3.32; P = 0.001). CONCLUSION: Toxin detection by EIA/CCA associated with IDSA severity, but this study was unable to confirm an association with subsequent adverse outcomes. The molecular epidemiology of C. difficile has shifted, and this may have implications for the optimal diagnostic strategy for CDI. [Image: see text] [Image: see text] DISCLOSURES: All authors: No reported disclosures. Oxford University Press 2019-10-23 /pmc/articles/PMC6810784/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofz360.2033 Text en © The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial reproduction and distribution of the work, in any medium, provided the original work is not altered or transformed in any way, and that the work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com |
spellingShingle | Abstracts Menon, Anitha Perry, Donald A Motyka, Jonathan Weiner, Shayna Standke, Alexandra Penkevich, Aline Keidan, Micah Young, Vincent B Rao, Krishna 2355. The Association Between Diagnostic Testing Method and Clostridium difficile Infection Severity |
title | 2355. The Association Between Diagnostic Testing Method and Clostridium difficile Infection Severity |
title_full | 2355. The Association Between Diagnostic Testing Method and Clostridium difficile Infection Severity |
title_fullStr | 2355. The Association Between Diagnostic Testing Method and Clostridium difficile Infection Severity |
title_full_unstemmed | 2355. The Association Between Diagnostic Testing Method and Clostridium difficile Infection Severity |
title_short | 2355. The Association Between Diagnostic Testing Method and Clostridium difficile Infection Severity |
title_sort | 2355. the association between diagnostic testing method and clostridium difficile infection severity |
topic | Abstracts |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6810784/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofz360.2033 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT menonanitha 2355theassociationbetweendiagnostictestingmethodandclostridiumdifficileinfectionseverity AT perrydonalda 2355theassociationbetweendiagnostictestingmethodandclostridiumdifficileinfectionseverity AT motykajonathan 2355theassociationbetweendiagnostictestingmethodandclostridiumdifficileinfectionseverity AT weinershayna 2355theassociationbetweendiagnostictestingmethodandclostridiumdifficileinfectionseverity AT standkealexandra 2355theassociationbetweendiagnostictestingmethodandclostridiumdifficileinfectionseverity AT penkevichaline 2355theassociationbetweendiagnostictestingmethodandclostridiumdifficileinfectionseverity AT keidanmicah 2355theassociationbetweendiagnostictestingmethodandclostridiumdifficileinfectionseverity AT youngvincentb 2355theassociationbetweendiagnostictestingmethodandclostridiumdifficileinfectionseverity AT raokrishna 2355theassociationbetweendiagnostictestingmethodandclostridiumdifficileinfectionseverity |