Cargando…

2244. Clinical Outcomes with Extended Infusion (EI) vs. Intermittent Infusion (II) of Cefepime (FEP), Piperacillin/Tazobactam (TZP), and Meropenem (MEM) in Patients with Gram-Negative (GN) Bacteremia

BACKGROUND: The increase in drug-resistant pathogens has prompted interest in dosing of β-lactams (BLs) via EI. Available data on this practice are conflicting, rarely assess non-critically ill patients or low MIC pathogens, and do not focus on outcomes other than clinical cure or mortality. Further...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tran, Kieu-Nhi, Mynatt, Ryan, Kaye, Keith S, Pogue, Jason M
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6810835/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofz360.1922
_version_ 1783462336558792704
author Tran, Kieu-Nhi
Mynatt, Ryan
Kaye, Keith S
Pogue, Jason M
author_facet Tran, Kieu-Nhi
Mynatt, Ryan
Kaye, Keith S
Pogue, Jason M
author_sort Tran, Kieu-Nhi
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The increase in drug-resistant pathogens has prompted interest in dosing of β-lactams (BLs) via EI. Available data on this practice are conflicting, rarely assess non-critically ill patients or low MIC pathogens, and do not focus on outcomes other than clinical cure or mortality. Further assessment of this practice is warranted. METHODS: This is a retrospective cohort study of adult patients who received FEP, TZP, or MEM for GN bacteremia via INI or EI from 2010 to 2018. Patients were included if the pathogen was susceptible to the target BL and they received study drug within 24 hours of bacteremia onset and continued it for ≥ 48 hours. Patients were excluded if they had a mixed infection or received > 48 hours of combination therapy. Patients were matched 1:1 based on study drug utilized, sepsis severity, ICU status, bacteremia source, and causative pathogen. Outcomes assessed included time to clinical stabilization as well as treatment failure, mortality, length of stay (LOS), and recurrence. RESULTS: 268 patients (134 matched patients in each group) were included. Median (IQR) age of the cohort was 64 (55–77) years, and 57% were male. Common comorbidities were diabetes (35%) and CKD (26%), and the median (IQR) Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) was 3 (1–4). 40% of the population presented with severe sepsis or septic shock, and 42% were in the ICU at infection onset. Baseline characteristics were similar between the two groups except patients receiving EI were older (65.5 (58–78) vs. 61.5 (52–73); P = 0.006 and had higher median CCI (3 (2–4) vs. 2 (1–3); P < 0.001,) while patients in the II group had a higher mean weight (85.5 ± 27.8 vs. 78.8 ± 19.2, P = 0.02.) The most common organisms isolated were E. coli(41%), K. pneumoniae (18%), and P. aeruginosa (13%), and the most common source of infection was the urine (51%). Outcomes are listed in Table 1. EI was associated with decreases in time to defervescence, WBC normalization, and SIRS resolution. Furthermore, EI was associated with a lower incidence of treatment failure and recurrence as well as decreases in LOS and ICU-LOS. There was no difference in mortality. CONCLUSION: The findings of this analysis highlight the role of EI in BL therapy as an important stewardship strategy to optimize clinical outcomes in all patients with GN bacteremia. [Image: see text] DISCLOSURES: All authors: No reported disclosures.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6810835
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-68108352019-10-28 2244. Clinical Outcomes with Extended Infusion (EI) vs. Intermittent Infusion (II) of Cefepime (FEP), Piperacillin/Tazobactam (TZP), and Meropenem (MEM) in Patients with Gram-Negative (GN) Bacteremia Tran, Kieu-Nhi Mynatt, Ryan Kaye, Keith S Pogue, Jason M Open Forum Infect Dis Abstracts BACKGROUND: The increase in drug-resistant pathogens has prompted interest in dosing of β-lactams (BLs) via EI. Available data on this practice are conflicting, rarely assess non-critically ill patients or low MIC pathogens, and do not focus on outcomes other than clinical cure or mortality. Further assessment of this practice is warranted. METHODS: This is a retrospective cohort study of adult patients who received FEP, TZP, or MEM for GN bacteremia via INI or EI from 2010 to 2018. Patients were included if the pathogen was susceptible to the target BL and they received study drug within 24 hours of bacteremia onset and continued it for ≥ 48 hours. Patients were excluded if they had a mixed infection or received > 48 hours of combination therapy. Patients were matched 1:1 based on study drug utilized, sepsis severity, ICU status, bacteremia source, and causative pathogen. Outcomes assessed included time to clinical stabilization as well as treatment failure, mortality, length of stay (LOS), and recurrence. RESULTS: 268 patients (134 matched patients in each group) were included. Median (IQR) age of the cohort was 64 (55–77) years, and 57% were male. Common comorbidities were diabetes (35%) and CKD (26%), and the median (IQR) Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) was 3 (1–4). 40% of the population presented with severe sepsis or septic shock, and 42% were in the ICU at infection onset. Baseline characteristics were similar between the two groups except patients receiving EI were older (65.5 (58–78) vs. 61.5 (52–73); P = 0.006 and had higher median CCI (3 (2–4) vs. 2 (1–3); P < 0.001,) while patients in the II group had a higher mean weight (85.5 ± 27.8 vs. 78.8 ± 19.2, P = 0.02.) The most common organisms isolated were E. coli(41%), K. pneumoniae (18%), and P. aeruginosa (13%), and the most common source of infection was the urine (51%). Outcomes are listed in Table 1. EI was associated with decreases in time to defervescence, WBC normalization, and SIRS resolution. Furthermore, EI was associated with a lower incidence of treatment failure and recurrence as well as decreases in LOS and ICU-LOS. There was no difference in mortality. CONCLUSION: The findings of this analysis highlight the role of EI in BL therapy as an important stewardship strategy to optimize clinical outcomes in all patients with GN bacteremia. [Image: see text] DISCLOSURES: All authors: No reported disclosures. Oxford University Press 2019-10-23 /pmc/articles/PMC6810835/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofz360.1922 Text en © The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial reproduction and distribution of the work, in any medium, provided the original work is not altered or transformed in any way, and that the work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Abstracts
Tran, Kieu-Nhi
Mynatt, Ryan
Kaye, Keith S
Pogue, Jason M
2244. Clinical Outcomes with Extended Infusion (EI) vs. Intermittent Infusion (II) of Cefepime (FEP), Piperacillin/Tazobactam (TZP), and Meropenem (MEM) in Patients with Gram-Negative (GN) Bacteremia
title 2244. Clinical Outcomes with Extended Infusion (EI) vs. Intermittent Infusion (II) of Cefepime (FEP), Piperacillin/Tazobactam (TZP), and Meropenem (MEM) in Patients with Gram-Negative (GN) Bacteremia
title_full 2244. Clinical Outcomes with Extended Infusion (EI) vs. Intermittent Infusion (II) of Cefepime (FEP), Piperacillin/Tazobactam (TZP), and Meropenem (MEM) in Patients with Gram-Negative (GN) Bacteremia
title_fullStr 2244. Clinical Outcomes with Extended Infusion (EI) vs. Intermittent Infusion (II) of Cefepime (FEP), Piperacillin/Tazobactam (TZP), and Meropenem (MEM) in Patients with Gram-Negative (GN) Bacteremia
title_full_unstemmed 2244. Clinical Outcomes with Extended Infusion (EI) vs. Intermittent Infusion (II) of Cefepime (FEP), Piperacillin/Tazobactam (TZP), and Meropenem (MEM) in Patients with Gram-Negative (GN) Bacteremia
title_short 2244. Clinical Outcomes with Extended Infusion (EI) vs. Intermittent Infusion (II) of Cefepime (FEP), Piperacillin/Tazobactam (TZP), and Meropenem (MEM) in Patients with Gram-Negative (GN) Bacteremia
title_sort 2244. clinical outcomes with extended infusion (ei) vs. intermittent infusion (ii) of cefepime (fep), piperacillin/tazobactam (tzp), and meropenem (mem) in patients with gram-negative (gn) bacteremia
topic Abstracts
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6810835/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofz360.1922
work_keys_str_mv AT trankieunhi 2244clinicaloutcomeswithextendedinfusioneivsintermittentinfusioniiofcefepimefeppiperacillintazobactamtzpandmeropenemmeminpatientswithgramnegativegnbacteremia
AT mynattryan 2244clinicaloutcomeswithextendedinfusioneivsintermittentinfusioniiofcefepimefeppiperacillintazobactamtzpandmeropenemmeminpatientswithgramnegativegnbacteremia
AT kayekeiths 2244clinicaloutcomeswithextendedinfusioneivsintermittentinfusioniiofcefepimefeppiperacillintazobactamtzpandmeropenemmeminpatientswithgramnegativegnbacteremia
AT poguejasonm 2244clinicaloutcomeswithextendedinfusioneivsintermittentinfusioniiofcefepimefeppiperacillintazobactamtzpandmeropenemmeminpatientswithgramnegativegnbacteremia