Cargando…
1047. Impact of Indication for Antibiotic Orders on Pharmacist Interventions
BACKGROUND: Joint Commission mandates that prescribers document indication for antibiotics at the time of prescribing. Antibiotic indications may offer opportunities for pharmacists to optimize dosing and frequency or provide alternative therapeutic options. We examined the impact of antibiotic indi...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6810904/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofz360.911 |
_version_ | 1783462349103955968 |
---|---|
author | Scardina, Tonya Sun, Shan Kotsonis-Chiampas, Lori Patel, Avani Patel, Sameer |
author_facet | Scardina, Tonya Sun, Shan Kotsonis-Chiampas, Lori Patel, Avani Patel, Sameer |
author_sort | Scardina, Tonya |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Joint Commission mandates that prescribers document indication for antibiotics at the time of prescribing. Antibiotic indications may offer opportunities for pharmacists to optimize dosing and frequency or provide alternative therapeutic options. We examined the impact of antibiotic indications during order entry on frequency and type of pharmacist interventions, time to order verification, and time to administration of antibiotics. METHODS: Number of pharmacist interventions documented in EPIC from 4/28/17 through 4/28/18 (pre-intervention) were compared with interventions from 4/29/18 through 2/28/19 (post-intervention). All pharmacist interventions involving antibiotic orders were included. For antibiotic orders involving a pharmacist intervention, data collected included antibiotic prescribed, indication for antibiotic (post-intervention only) and reason for intervention. For administered antibiotics, data collected included order time, time of arrival of order in pharmacist queue, pharmacist verification time, patient administration time. Statistical analysis involved chi-squared test (compare the reason for intervention) and t-test (compare difference in time). RESULTS: There were 790 orders and 638 orders that involved a pharmacist’s interventions, pre-intervention and post-intervention, respectively (Tables 1 and 2). Pre-intervention, there were 200 antibiotic orders that had a documented pharmacist intervention and were administered. Post-intervention, there were 184 orders that had a documented pharmacist intervention and were administered. Abdominal/pelvic (29 orders, 16%), sepsis (19 orders, 10%), and surgical prophylaxis (18 orders, 9.7%) were the most frequent indications selected during order entry. Average time to order verification was 119 minutes pre-intervention and 123 minutes post-intervention (P =0.97). Average time to administration of antibiotics was 313 minutes and 360 minutes pre-intervention and post-intervention, respectively (P =0.45). CONCLUSION: Inclusion of the selection of antibiotic indications during order entry did not significantly impact the number of pharmacist interventions, time to order verification nor time to administration. [Image: see text] [Image: see text] DISCLOSURES: All authors: No reported disclosures. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6810904 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-68109042019-10-28 1047. Impact of Indication for Antibiotic Orders on Pharmacist Interventions Scardina, Tonya Sun, Shan Kotsonis-Chiampas, Lori Patel, Avani Patel, Sameer Open Forum Infect Dis Abstracts BACKGROUND: Joint Commission mandates that prescribers document indication for antibiotics at the time of prescribing. Antibiotic indications may offer opportunities for pharmacists to optimize dosing and frequency or provide alternative therapeutic options. We examined the impact of antibiotic indications during order entry on frequency and type of pharmacist interventions, time to order verification, and time to administration of antibiotics. METHODS: Number of pharmacist interventions documented in EPIC from 4/28/17 through 4/28/18 (pre-intervention) were compared with interventions from 4/29/18 through 2/28/19 (post-intervention). All pharmacist interventions involving antibiotic orders were included. For antibiotic orders involving a pharmacist intervention, data collected included antibiotic prescribed, indication for antibiotic (post-intervention only) and reason for intervention. For administered antibiotics, data collected included order time, time of arrival of order in pharmacist queue, pharmacist verification time, patient administration time. Statistical analysis involved chi-squared test (compare the reason for intervention) and t-test (compare difference in time). RESULTS: There were 790 orders and 638 orders that involved a pharmacist’s interventions, pre-intervention and post-intervention, respectively (Tables 1 and 2). Pre-intervention, there were 200 antibiotic orders that had a documented pharmacist intervention and were administered. Post-intervention, there were 184 orders that had a documented pharmacist intervention and were administered. Abdominal/pelvic (29 orders, 16%), sepsis (19 orders, 10%), and surgical prophylaxis (18 orders, 9.7%) were the most frequent indications selected during order entry. Average time to order verification was 119 minutes pre-intervention and 123 minutes post-intervention (P =0.97). Average time to administration of antibiotics was 313 minutes and 360 minutes pre-intervention and post-intervention, respectively (P =0.45). CONCLUSION: Inclusion of the selection of antibiotic indications during order entry did not significantly impact the number of pharmacist interventions, time to order verification nor time to administration. [Image: see text] [Image: see text] DISCLOSURES: All authors: No reported disclosures. Oxford University Press 2019-10-23 /pmc/articles/PMC6810904/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofz360.911 Text en © The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial reproduction and distribution of the work, in any medium, provided the original work is not altered or transformed in any way, and that the work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com |
spellingShingle | Abstracts Scardina, Tonya Sun, Shan Kotsonis-Chiampas, Lori Patel, Avani Patel, Sameer 1047. Impact of Indication for Antibiotic Orders on Pharmacist Interventions |
title | 1047. Impact of Indication for Antibiotic Orders on Pharmacist Interventions |
title_full | 1047. Impact of Indication for Antibiotic Orders on Pharmacist Interventions |
title_fullStr | 1047. Impact of Indication for Antibiotic Orders on Pharmacist Interventions |
title_full_unstemmed | 1047. Impact of Indication for Antibiotic Orders on Pharmacist Interventions |
title_short | 1047. Impact of Indication for Antibiotic Orders on Pharmacist Interventions |
title_sort | 1047. impact of indication for antibiotic orders on pharmacist interventions |
topic | Abstracts |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6810904/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofz360.911 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT scardinatonya 1047impactofindicationforantibioticordersonpharmacistinterventions AT sunshan 1047impactofindicationforantibioticordersonpharmacistinterventions AT kotsonischiampaslori 1047impactofindicationforantibioticordersonpharmacistinterventions AT patelavani 1047impactofindicationforantibioticordersonpharmacistinterventions AT patelsameer 1047impactofindicationforantibioticordersonpharmacistinterventions |