Cargando…

1047. Impact of Indication for Antibiotic Orders on Pharmacist Interventions

BACKGROUND: Joint Commission mandates that prescribers document indication for antibiotics at the time of prescribing. Antibiotic indications may offer opportunities for pharmacists to optimize dosing and frequency or provide alternative therapeutic options. We examined the impact of antibiotic indi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Scardina, Tonya, Sun, Shan, Kotsonis-Chiampas, Lori, Patel, Avani, Patel, Sameer
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6810904/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofz360.911
_version_ 1783462349103955968
author Scardina, Tonya
Sun, Shan
Kotsonis-Chiampas, Lori
Patel, Avani
Patel, Sameer
author_facet Scardina, Tonya
Sun, Shan
Kotsonis-Chiampas, Lori
Patel, Avani
Patel, Sameer
author_sort Scardina, Tonya
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Joint Commission mandates that prescribers document indication for antibiotics at the time of prescribing. Antibiotic indications may offer opportunities for pharmacists to optimize dosing and frequency or provide alternative therapeutic options. We examined the impact of antibiotic indications during order entry on frequency and type of pharmacist interventions, time to order verification, and time to administration of antibiotics. METHODS: Number of pharmacist interventions documented in EPIC from 4/28/17 through 4/28/18 (pre-intervention) were compared with interventions from 4/29/18 through 2/28/19 (post-intervention). All pharmacist interventions involving antibiotic orders were included. For antibiotic orders involving a pharmacist intervention, data collected included antibiotic prescribed, indication for antibiotic (post-intervention only) and reason for intervention. For administered antibiotics, data collected included order time, time of arrival of order in pharmacist queue, pharmacist verification time, patient administration time. Statistical analysis involved chi-squared test (compare the reason for intervention) and t-test (compare difference in time). RESULTS: There were 790 orders and 638 orders that involved a pharmacist’s interventions, pre-intervention and post-intervention, respectively (Tables 1 and 2). Pre-intervention, there were 200 antibiotic orders that had a documented pharmacist intervention and were administered. Post-intervention, there were 184 orders that had a documented pharmacist intervention and were administered. Abdominal/pelvic (29 orders, 16%), sepsis (19 orders, 10%), and surgical prophylaxis (18 orders, 9.7%) were the most frequent indications selected during order entry. Average time to order verification was 119 minutes pre-intervention and 123 minutes post-intervention (P =0.97). Average time to administration of antibiotics was 313 minutes and 360 minutes pre-intervention and post-intervention, respectively (P =0.45). CONCLUSION: Inclusion of the selection of antibiotic indications during order entry did not significantly impact the number of pharmacist interventions, time to order verification nor time to administration. [Image: see text] [Image: see text] DISCLOSURES: All authors: No reported disclosures.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6810904
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-68109042019-10-28 1047. Impact of Indication for Antibiotic Orders on Pharmacist Interventions Scardina, Tonya Sun, Shan Kotsonis-Chiampas, Lori Patel, Avani Patel, Sameer Open Forum Infect Dis Abstracts BACKGROUND: Joint Commission mandates that prescribers document indication for antibiotics at the time of prescribing. Antibiotic indications may offer opportunities for pharmacists to optimize dosing and frequency or provide alternative therapeutic options. We examined the impact of antibiotic indications during order entry on frequency and type of pharmacist interventions, time to order verification, and time to administration of antibiotics. METHODS: Number of pharmacist interventions documented in EPIC from 4/28/17 through 4/28/18 (pre-intervention) were compared with interventions from 4/29/18 through 2/28/19 (post-intervention). All pharmacist interventions involving antibiotic orders were included. For antibiotic orders involving a pharmacist intervention, data collected included antibiotic prescribed, indication for antibiotic (post-intervention only) and reason for intervention. For administered antibiotics, data collected included order time, time of arrival of order in pharmacist queue, pharmacist verification time, patient administration time. Statistical analysis involved chi-squared test (compare the reason for intervention) and t-test (compare difference in time). RESULTS: There were 790 orders and 638 orders that involved a pharmacist’s interventions, pre-intervention and post-intervention, respectively (Tables 1 and 2). Pre-intervention, there were 200 antibiotic orders that had a documented pharmacist intervention and were administered. Post-intervention, there were 184 orders that had a documented pharmacist intervention and were administered. Abdominal/pelvic (29 orders, 16%), sepsis (19 orders, 10%), and surgical prophylaxis (18 orders, 9.7%) were the most frequent indications selected during order entry. Average time to order verification was 119 minutes pre-intervention and 123 minutes post-intervention (P =0.97). Average time to administration of antibiotics was 313 minutes and 360 minutes pre-intervention and post-intervention, respectively (P =0.45). CONCLUSION: Inclusion of the selection of antibiotic indications during order entry did not significantly impact the number of pharmacist interventions, time to order verification nor time to administration. [Image: see text] [Image: see text] DISCLOSURES: All authors: No reported disclosures. Oxford University Press 2019-10-23 /pmc/articles/PMC6810904/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofz360.911 Text en © The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial reproduction and distribution of the work, in any medium, provided the original work is not altered or transformed in any way, and that the work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Abstracts
Scardina, Tonya
Sun, Shan
Kotsonis-Chiampas, Lori
Patel, Avani
Patel, Sameer
1047. Impact of Indication for Antibiotic Orders on Pharmacist Interventions
title 1047. Impact of Indication for Antibiotic Orders on Pharmacist Interventions
title_full 1047. Impact of Indication for Antibiotic Orders on Pharmacist Interventions
title_fullStr 1047. Impact of Indication for Antibiotic Orders on Pharmacist Interventions
title_full_unstemmed 1047. Impact of Indication for Antibiotic Orders on Pharmacist Interventions
title_short 1047. Impact of Indication for Antibiotic Orders on Pharmacist Interventions
title_sort 1047. impact of indication for antibiotic orders on pharmacist interventions
topic Abstracts
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6810904/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofz360.911
work_keys_str_mv AT scardinatonya 1047impactofindicationforantibioticordersonpharmacistinterventions
AT sunshan 1047impactofindicationforantibioticordersonpharmacistinterventions
AT kotsonischiampaslori 1047impactofindicationforantibioticordersonpharmacistinterventions
AT patelavani 1047impactofindicationforantibioticordersonpharmacistinterventions
AT patelsameer 1047impactofindicationforantibioticordersonpharmacistinterventions