Cargando…
1010. Exploring Antimicrobial Prescriptions in a National Audit of Hematology/Oncology Inpatients Compared with the General Inpatient Population: Targeted Analysis Highlights Key Areas for Targeted Intervention
BACKGROUND: Little is known about the antimicrobial prescribing practices in hematology and oncology (haemonc) populations. We aimed to explore antimicrobial prescribing practices in haemonc patients compared with other acute inpatients, in order to target areas for intervention. METHODS: In Austral...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6810919/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofz360.874 |
_version_ | 1783462352672260096 |
---|---|
author | Douglas, Abby Hall, Lisa James, Rodney Worth, Leon Slavin, Monica Thursky, Karin |
author_facet | Douglas, Abby Hall, Lisa James, Rodney Worth, Leon Slavin, Monica Thursky, Karin |
author_sort | Douglas, Abby |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Little is known about the antimicrobial prescribing practices in hematology and oncology (haemonc) populations. We aimed to explore antimicrobial prescribing practices in haemonc patients compared with other acute inpatients, in order to target areas for intervention. METHODS: In Australia, facilities nationwide participate in an annual point-prevalence survey of antimicrobial prescribing in hospitalized patients (Hospital National Antimicrobial Prescribing Survey (Hospital NAPS)). The results for adult inpatients from 2015–2018 were analyzed. Assessments of appropriateness were undertaken by local antimicrobial stewardship teams according to a structured algorithm, and defined as: 1 (optimal); 2 (adequate); 3 (suboptimal); 4 (inadequate); 5 (not assessable). A score of 1 or 2 is considered to be”appropriate’ and 3 or 4 ‘inappropriate’; those not assessable were excluded. Antimicrobial class, indication and appropriateness were compared between haemonc and other acute inpatient populations. Using logistic regression analysis, factors associated with appropriate prescribing of antibacterials were explored. RESULTS: The survey comprised 95809 antibiotic prescriptions for 63668 adult inpatients (4097 haemonc, 59571 other inpatients) in 423 acute facilities. The top treatment and prophylactic indications for all classes of antimicrobials were highly disparate between haemonc and other inpatients (table). Of note in the haemonc group, vancomycin use was high, and amphotericin B was used frequently for antifungal treatment. In multivariate analysis, haemonc patients were strongly associated with antibacterial appropriateness compared with other inpatients (adjusted OR 1.72, 95% CI 1.59–1.87, P < 0.001); factors associated with inappropriate prescription included antibiotic allergies and prophylactic indications. CONCLUSION: Haemonc patients were more likely to receive appropriate antimicrobials compared with other inpatients. However, we have identified key areas for targeted interventions (prophylaxis use, antimicrobial allergy labels, vancomycin and amphotericin B treatment). Separate analysis of haemonc populations is necessary to identify key areas of concern specific to this patient group. [Image: see text] DISCLOSURES: All authors: No reported disclosures. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6810919 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-68109192019-10-28 1010. Exploring Antimicrobial Prescriptions in a National Audit of Hematology/Oncology Inpatients Compared with the General Inpatient Population: Targeted Analysis Highlights Key Areas for Targeted Intervention Douglas, Abby Hall, Lisa James, Rodney Worth, Leon Slavin, Monica Thursky, Karin Open Forum Infect Dis Abstracts BACKGROUND: Little is known about the antimicrobial prescribing practices in hematology and oncology (haemonc) populations. We aimed to explore antimicrobial prescribing practices in haemonc patients compared with other acute inpatients, in order to target areas for intervention. METHODS: In Australia, facilities nationwide participate in an annual point-prevalence survey of antimicrobial prescribing in hospitalized patients (Hospital National Antimicrobial Prescribing Survey (Hospital NAPS)). The results for adult inpatients from 2015–2018 were analyzed. Assessments of appropriateness were undertaken by local antimicrobial stewardship teams according to a structured algorithm, and defined as: 1 (optimal); 2 (adequate); 3 (suboptimal); 4 (inadequate); 5 (not assessable). A score of 1 or 2 is considered to be”appropriate’ and 3 or 4 ‘inappropriate’; those not assessable were excluded. Antimicrobial class, indication and appropriateness were compared between haemonc and other acute inpatient populations. Using logistic regression analysis, factors associated with appropriate prescribing of antibacterials were explored. RESULTS: The survey comprised 95809 antibiotic prescriptions for 63668 adult inpatients (4097 haemonc, 59571 other inpatients) in 423 acute facilities. The top treatment and prophylactic indications for all classes of antimicrobials were highly disparate between haemonc and other inpatients (table). Of note in the haemonc group, vancomycin use was high, and amphotericin B was used frequently for antifungal treatment. In multivariate analysis, haemonc patients were strongly associated with antibacterial appropriateness compared with other inpatients (adjusted OR 1.72, 95% CI 1.59–1.87, P < 0.001); factors associated with inappropriate prescription included antibiotic allergies and prophylactic indications. CONCLUSION: Haemonc patients were more likely to receive appropriate antimicrobials compared with other inpatients. However, we have identified key areas for targeted interventions (prophylaxis use, antimicrobial allergy labels, vancomycin and amphotericin B treatment). Separate analysis of haemonc populations is necessary to identify key areas of concern specific to this patient group. [Image: see text] DISCLOSURES: All authors: No reported disclosures. Oxford University Press 2019-10-23 /pmc/articles/PMC6810919/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofz360.874 Text en © The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial reproduction and distribution of the work, in any medium, provided the original work is not altered or transformed in any way, and that the work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com |
spellingShingle | Abstracts Douglas, Abby Hall, Lisa James, Rodney Worth, Leon Slavin, Monica Thursky, Karin 1010. Exploring Antimicrobial Prescriptions in a National Audit of Hematology/Oncology Inpatients Compared with the General Inpatient Population: Targeted Analysis Highlights Key Areas for Targeted Intervention |
title | 1010. Exploring Antimicrobial Prescriptions in a National Audit of Hematology/Oncology Inpatients Compared with the General Inpatient Population: Targeted Analysis Highlights Key Areas for Targeted Intervention |
title_full | 1010. Exploring Antimicrobial Prescriptions in a National Audit of Hematology/Oncology Inpatients Compared with the General Inpatient Population: Targeted Analysis Highlights Key Areas for Targeted Intervention |
title_fullStr | 1010. Exploring Antimicrobial Prescriptions in a National Audit of Hematology/Oncology Inpatients Compared with the General Inpatient Population: Targeted Analysis Highlights Key Areas for Targeted Intervention |
title_full_unstemmed | 1010. Exploring Antimicrobial Prescriptions in a National Audit of Hematology/Oncology Inpatients Compared with the General Inpatient Population: Targeted Analysis Highlights Key Areas for Targeted Intervention |
title_short | 1010. Exploring Antimicrobial Prescriptions in a National Audit of Hematology/Oncology Inpatients Compared with the General Inpatient Population: Targeted Analysis Highlights Key Areas for Targeted Intervention |
title_sort | 1010. exploring antimicrobial prescriptions in a national audit of hematology/oncology inpatients compared with the general inpatient population: targeted analysis highlights key areas for targeted intervention |
topic | Abstracts |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6810919/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofz360.874 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT douglasabby 1010exploringantimicrobialprescriptionsinanationalauditofhematologyoncologyinpatientscomparedwiththegeneralinpatientpopulationtargetedanalysishighlightskeyareasfortargetedintervention AT halllisa 1010exploringantimicrobialprescriptionsinanationalauditofhematologyoncologyinpatientscomparedwiththegeneralinpatientpopulationtargetedanalysishighlightskeyareasfortargetedintervention AT jamesrodney 1010exploringantimicrobialprescriptionsinanationalauditofhematologyoncologyinpatientscomparedwiththegeneralinpatientpopulationtargetedanalysishighlightskeyareasfortargetedintervention AT worthleon 1010exploringantimicrobialprescriptionsinanationalauditofhematologyoncologyinpatientscomparedwiththegeneralinpatientpopulationtargetedanalysishighlightskeyareasfortargetedintervention AT slavinmonica 1010exploringantimicrobialprescriptionsinanationalauditofhematologyoncologyinpatientscomparedwiththegeneralinpatientpopulationtargetedanalysishighlightskeyareasfortargetedintervention AT thurskykarin 1010exploringantimicrobialprescriptionsinanationalauditofhematologyoncologyinpatientscomparedwiththegeneralinpatientpopulationtargetedanalysishighlightskeyareasfortargetedintervention |