Cargando…

1013. Electronic Assessment of Empiric Antibiotic Prescribing Using Diagnosis Codes

BACKGROUND: Antimicrobial stewardship programs (ASPs) must understand empiric choices for specific disease syndromes to assess adherence to local empiric treatment guidelines. Electronically-derived metrics to track empiric therapy choices would allow ASPs to target areas for intervention without si...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Dodds Ashley, Elizabeth, Nelson, Alicia, Johnson, Melissa D, Jones, Travis M, Davis, Angelina, Dyer, April, Moehring, Rebekah W
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6810924/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofz360.877
_version_ 1783462353902239744
author Dodds Ashley, Elizabeth
Nelson, Alicia
Johnson, Melissa D
Jones, Travis M
Davis, Angelina
Dyer, April
Moehring, Rebekah W
author_facet Dodds Ashley, Elizabeth
Nelson, Alicia
Johnson, Melissa D
Jones, Travis M
Davis, Angelina
Dyer, April
Moehring, Rebekah W
author_sort Dodds Ashley, Elizabeth
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Antimicrobial stewardship programs (ASPs) must understand empiric choices for specific disease syndromes to assess adherence to local empiric treatment guidelines. Electronically-derived metrics to track empiric therapy choices would allow ASPs to target areas for intervention without significant data collection burden. METHODS: Admissions from 10 community hospitals between 7/2016 and December 2018 were reviewed to identify those with common infectious syndromes: pneumonia (PNA), urinary tract infection (UTI) and skin and soft-tissue infection (SSTI). Admissions with a syndrome of interest were identified using AHRQ clinical classifications software codes based on ICD-10 codes for infection at the time of discharge. Admissions were categorized as having the syndrome of interest with or without sepsis. Antibiotics received during the first 48 hours of inpatient admission were obtained from electronic medication administration records. The proportion of syndrome admissions receiving specific antibiotic agents was determined to evaluate initial treatment choices as compared with local empiric guidelines. Antibiotic categories were not mutually exclusive, admissions receiving combination therapy were included in the count for each individual agent as well as the combination group. The denominator was the count of admissions with the syndrome of interest. Distributions were tracked over time to observe the effects of ASP intervention. RESULTS: The analysis included 49,303 admissions. The most common diagnosis was UTI (30%) followed by PNA (23%). Empiric antibiotic use varied by syndrome (Figure 1). In general, patients with a targeted infectious diagnosis and sepsis received more broad-spectrum agents than those without sepsis. SSTI was an exception, but few patients admitted with SSTI did not also have presumed sepsis. Longitudinal analysis demonstrated shifts from less preferred agents to guideline-concordant choices. For example, for admissions with a diagnosis of PNA, we observed a steady year on year increase in ceftriaxone (preferred) while levofloxacin (avoided in local guidelines) declined. (Figure 2) CONCLUSION: Syndrome-specific diagnosis codes were helpful in assessing empiric antibiotic selection and may assist ASPs in improving empiric guideline adherence. [Image: see text] [Image: see text] DISCLOSURES: All authors: No reported disclosures.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6810924
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-68109242019-10-28 1013. Electronic Assessment of Empiric Antibiotic Prescribing Using Diagnosis Codes Dodds Ashley, Elizabeth Nelson, Alicia Johnson, Melissa D Jones, Travis M Davis, Angelina Dyer, April Moehring, Rebekah W Open Forum Infect Dis Abstracts BACKGROUND: Antimicrobial stewardship programs (ASPs) must understand empiric choices for specific disease syndromes to assess adherence to local empiric treatment guidelines. Electronically-derived metrics to track empiric therapy choices would allow ASPs to target areas for intervention without significant data collection burden. METHODS: Admissions from 10 community hospitals between 7/2016 and December 2018 were reviewed to identify those with common infectious syndromes: pneumonia (PNA), urinary tract infection (UTI) and skin and soft-tissue infection (SSTI). Admissions with a syndrome of interest were identified using AHRQ clinical classifications software codes based on ICD-10 codes for infection at the time of discharge. Admissions were categorized as having the syndrome of interest with or without sepsis. Antibiotics received during the first 48 hours of inpatient admission were obtained from electronic medication administration records. The proportion of syndrome admissions receiving specific antibiotic agents was determined to evaluate initial treatment choices as compared with local empiric guidelines. Antibiotic categories were not mutually exclusive, admissions receiving combination therapy were included in the count for each individual agent as well as the combination group. The denominator was the count of admissions with the syndrome of interest. Distributions were tracked over time to observe the effects of ASP intervention. RESULTS: The analysis included 49,303 admissions. The most common diagnosis was UTI (30%) followed by PNA (23%). Empiric antibiotic use varied by syndrome (Figure 1). In general, patients with a targeted infectious diagnosis and sepsis received more broad-spectrum agents than those without sepsis. SSTI was an exception, but few patients admitted with SSTI did not also have presumed sepsis. Longitudinal analysis demonstrated shifts from less preferred agents to guideline-concordant choices. For example, for admissions with a diagnosis of PNA, we observed a steady year on year increase in ceftriaxone (preferred) while levofloxacin (avoided in local guidelines) declined. (Figure 2) CONCLUSION: Syndrome-specific diagnosis codes were helpful in assessing empiric antibiotic selection and may assist ASPs in improving empiric guideline adherence. [Image: see text] [Image: see text] DISCLOSURES: All authors: No reported disclosures. Oxford University Press 2019-10-23 /pmc/articles/PMC6810924/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofz360.877 Text en © The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial reproduction and distribution of the work, in any medium, provided the original work is not altered or transformed in any way, and that the work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Abstracts
Dodds Ashley, Elizabeth
Nelson, Alicia
Johnson, Melissa D
Jones, Travis M
Davis, Angelina
Dyer, April
Moehring, Rebekah W
1013. Electronic Assessment of Empiric Antibiotic Prescribing Using Diagnosis Codes
title 1013. Electronic Assessment of Empiric Antibiotic Prescribing Using Diagnosis Codes
title_full 1013. Electronic Assessment of Empiric Antibiotic Prescribing Using Diagnosis Codes
title_fullStr 1013. Electronic Assessment of Empiric Antibiotic Prescribing Using Diagnosis Codes
title_full_unstemmed 1013. Electronic Assessment of Empiric Antibiotic Prescribing Using Diagnosis Codes
title_short 1013. Electronic Assessment of Empiric Antibiotic Prescribing Using Diagnosis Codes
title_sort 1013. electronic assessment of empiric antibiotic prescribing using diagnosis codes
topic Abstracts
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6810924/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofz360.877
work_keys_str_mv AT doddsashleyelizabeth 1013electronicassessmentofempiricantibioticprescribingusingdiagnosiscodes
AT nelsonalicia 1013electronicassessmentofempiricantibioticprescribingusingdiagnosiscodes
AT johnsonmelissad 1013electronicassessmentofempiricantibioticprescribingusingdiagnosiscodes
AT jonestravism 1013electronicassessmentofempiricantibioticprescribingusingdiagnosiscodes
AT davisangelina 1013electronicassessmentofempiricantibioticprescribingusingdiagnosiscodes
AT dyerapril 1013electronicassessmentofempiricantibioticprescribingusingdiagnosiscodes
AT moehringrebekahw 1013electronicassessmentofempiricantibioticprescribingusingdiagnosiscodes