Cargando…

761. Sepsis Readmissions and Coding in Two Community Hospitals

BACKGROUND: An estimated 1.7 million adults in the United States develop sepsis and nearly 270,000 Americans die because of sepsis annually. A diagnosis of sepsis increases hospitalization costs, antibiotic usage, and mortality. Admissions for sepsis account for a high proportion of 30-day readmissi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cheruranky, Anita, Li, Aldon, Faiad, Graciela
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6810992/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofz360.829
_version_ 1783462370666872832
author Cheruranky, Anita
Li, Aldon
Faiad, Graciela
author_facet Cheruranky, Anita
Li, Aldon
Faiad, Graciela
author_sort Cheruranky, Anita
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: An estimated 1.7 million adults in the United States develop sepsis and nearly 270,000 Americans die because of sepsis annually. A diagnosis of sepsis increases hospitalization costs, antibiotic usage, and mortality. Admissions for sepsis account for a high proportion of 30-day readmissions, creating a major financial burden for the healthcare system. However, reliable measurement of sepsis incidence remains challenging given increasing clinical awareness, changes in diagnosis/coding practices and changing definitions. We thus sought to evaluate sepsis readmissions and coding practices at 2 community hospitals (226, 99 beds). METHODS: A total of 997 hospitalizations occurred at both institutions with a primary diagnosis of sepsis from January 30, 2018–December 31, 2018; out of which 130 were readmitted within 30 days.An Infectious Disease trained physician reviewed all 130 index admissions and readmissions. Sepsis was defined as per the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) sepsis-1 mandate: 2 of 4 SIRS criteria + suspected infection. RESULTS: All 130/130 (100%) index hospital admissions had a primary discharge diagnosis of sepsis, out of which only 85/130 (65%) met criteria for sepsis. While coded as sepsis, in 45/130 (35%) cases no infectious etiology was found. Among 130 readmissions 51 (39%) truly met criteria for sepsis. The infectious etiologies of index admissions included urinary tract infections (UTI) (18), pneumonia (16), bacteremia (16), abscess (9), Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) (8), cellulitis (5), neutropenic fever (5), cholecystitis (4), meningoencephalitis (1), candidemia (1). Readmissions that met criteria for sepsis included pneumonia (10), UTI (8), abscess (7), CDI (5), bacteremia (5), osteomyelitis (4), cellulitis (4), neutropenic fever (3), candidemia (2), and cholecystitis (2). CONCLUSION: Shockingly 35% of the index admission cases were misdiagnosed as sepsis and as high as 61% on re-admissions. Increasing clinical awareness and compliance with CMS may have led to overdiagnosis and treatment of sepsis. Given the significant treatment and prevention initiatives that are being undertaken; reliable sepsis definition and coding is warranted for accurate surveillance purposes. DISCLOSURES: All authors: No reported disclosures.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6810992
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-68109922019-10-28 761. Sepsis Readmissions and Coding in Two Community Hospitals Cheruranky, Anita Li, Aldon Faiad, Graciela Open Forum Infect Dis Abstracts BACKGROUND: An estimated 1.7 million adults in the United States develop sepsis and nearly 270,000 Americans die because of sepsis annually. A diagnosis of sepsis increases hospitalization costs, antibiotic usage, and mortality. Admissions for sepsis account for a high proportion of 30-day readmissions, creating a major financial burden for the healthcare system. However, reliable measurement of sepsis incidence remains challenging given increasing clinical awareness, changes in diagnosis/coding practices and changing definitions. We thus sought to evaluate sepsis readmissions and coding practices at 2 community hospitals (226, 99 beds). METHODS: A total of 997 hospitalizations occurred at both institutions with a primary diagnosis of sepsis from January 30, 2018–December 31, 2018; out of which 130 were readmitted within 30 days.An Infectious Disease trained physician reviewed all 130 index admissions and readmissions. Sepsis was defined as per the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) sepsis-1 mandate: 2 of 4 SIRS criteria + suspected infection. RESULTS: All 130/130 (100%) index hospital admissions had a primary discharge diagnosis of sepsis, out of which only 85/130 (65%) met criteria for sepsis. While coded as sepsis, in 45/130 (35%) cases no infectious etiology was found. Among 130 readmissions 51 (39%) truly met criteria for sepsis. The infectious etiologies of index admissions included urinary tract infections (UTI) (18), pneumonia (16), bacteremia (16), abscess (9), Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) (8), cellulitis (5), neutropenic fever (5), cholecystitis (4), meningoencephalitis (1), candidemia (1). Readmissions that met criteria for sepsis included pneumonia (10), UTI (8), abscess (7), CDI (5), bacteremia (5), osteomyelitis (4), cellulitis (4), neutropenic fever (3), candidemia (2), and cholecystitis (2). CONCLUSION: Shockingly 35% of the index admission cases were misdiagnosed as sepsis and as high as 61% on re-admissions. Increasing clinical awareness and compliance with CMS may have led to overdiagnosis and treatment of sepsis. Given the significant treatment and prevention initiatives that are being undertaken; reliable sepsis definition and coding is warranted for accurate surveillance purposes. DISCLOSURES: All authors: No reported disclosures. Oxford University Press 2019-10-23 /pmc/articles/PMC6810992/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofz360.829 Text en © The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial reproduction and distribution of the work, in any medium, provided the original work is not altered or transformed in any way, and that the work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Abstracts
Cheruranky, Anita
Li, Aldon
Faiad, Graciela
761. Sepsis Readmissions and Coding in Two Community Hospitals
title 761. Sepsis Readmissions and Coding in Two Community Hospitals
title_full 761. Sepsis Readmissions and Coding in Two Community Hospitals
title_fullStr 761. Sepsis Readmissions and Coding in Two Community Hospitals
title_full_unstemmed 761. Sepsis Readmissions and Coding in Two Community Hospitals
title_short 761. Sepsis Readmissions and Coding in Two Community Hospitals
title_sort 761. sepsis readmissions and coding in two community hospitals
topic Abstracts
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6810992/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofz360.829
work_keys_str_mv AT cherurankyanita 761sepsisreadmissionsandcodingintwocommunityhospitals
AT lialdon 761sepsisreadmissionsandcodingintwocommunityhospitals
AT faiadgraciela 761sepsisreadmissionsandcodingintwocommunityhospitals