Cargando…

1046. Evaluating the outcomes of embedding Antimicrobial Stewardship order sets in the General Medicine Admission Electronic Order Set: A Retrospective Study

BACKGROUND: The use of facility-specific guidelines and clinical decision-making tools are recommended by a number of organizations to improve the appropriateness of empiric antimicrobial prescribing; however, how to increase usage is not clear. We evaluated the impact of embedding antimicrobial ste...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chan, April, Kapur, Ajay, Langford, Bradley, Downing, Mark
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6811036/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofz360.910
_version_ 1783462381417922560
author Chan, April
Kapur, Ajay
Langford, Bradley
Downing, Mark
author_facet Chan, April
Kapur, Ajay
Langford, Bradley
Downing, Mark
author_sort Chan, April
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The use of facility-specific guidelines and clinical decision-making tools are recommended by a number of organizations to improve the appropriateness of empiric antimicrobial prescribing; however, how to increase usage is not clear. We evaluated the impact of embedding antimicrobial stewardship (AS) electronic order sets (EOS) into the general medicine admission EOS in the context of an established AS program. METHODS: The standalone EOS for community-acquired pneumonia (CAP), urinary tract infection (UTI) and cellulitis were reviewed and simplified to only include the antibiotic section prior to embedding. The intervention was introduced on March 30, 2017 with pre-intervention period defined as January 1, 2016 to March 29, 2017 and post-intervention period as of March 30, 2017 to June 30, 2018. The primary outcome was the change in usage of embedded AS EOS compared with the corresponding standalone EOS using counts. In addition, other standalone AS EOS (i.e., Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI), etc) were used as a control. The secondary outcomes were the change in antibiotic usage de-emphasized in embedded EOS (i.e., ceftriaxone, ciprofloxacin, clindamycin, moxifloxacin) and predicted prescribing shifts to antibiotics in the embedded EOS (i.e., amoxicillin-clavulanate, azithromycin and sulfamethoxazole-trimethoprim) using Days of Therapy (DOT)/1000 patient-days (PD). Paired t-test was used to compare antibiotic usage pre- and post-intervention. RESULTS: The usage of standalone EOS remained similar pre- and post-intervention except for a 16-fold increased usage of CDI EOS. There were large increases in uptake of the embedded EOS compared with the standalone EOS: 11-fold () increase for CAP, 47-fold () increase for UTI and 24-fold () increase for cellulitis. In addition, there was a statistically significant decrease in ciprofloxacin (mean 16.6 DOT/1000-PD vs. 13.6 DOT/1000-PD, P = 0.026) and moxifloxacin usage (mean 9.3 DOT/1000-PD vs. 5.2 DOT/1000-PD) during the study time period. CONCLUSION: Our study showed that simplifying AS EOS and embedding these into a more commonly used EOS is associated with a significant increase in EOS usage and uptake of AS recommended empiric antibiotics with a decrease in fluoroquinolone usage. [Image: see text] [Image: see text] DISCLOSURES: All authors: No reported disclosures.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6811036
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-68110362019-10-28 1046. Evaluating the outcomes of embedding Antimicrobial Stewardship order sets in the General Medicine Admission Electronic Order Set: A Retrospective Study Chan, April Kapur, Ajay Langford, Bradley Downing, Mark Open Forum Infect Dis Abstracts BACKGROUND: The use of facility-specific guidelines and clinical decision-making tools are recommended by a number of organizations to improve the appropriateness of empiric antimicrobial prescribing; however, how to increase usage is not clear. We evaluated the impact of embedding antimicrobial stewardship (AS) electronic order sets (EOS) into the general medicine admission EOS in the context of an established AS program. METHODS: The standalone EOS for community-acquired pneumonia (CAP), urinary tract infection (UTI) and cellulitis were reviewed and simplified to only include the antibiotic section prior to embedding. The intervention was introduced on March 30, 2017 with pre-intervention period defined as January 1, 2016 to March 29, 2017 and post-intervention period as of March 30, 2017 to June 30, 2018. The primary outcome was the change in usage of embedded AS EOS compared with the corresponding standalone EOS using counts. In addition, other standalone AS EOS (i.e., Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI), etc) were used as a control. The secondary outcomes were the change in antibiotic usage de-emphasized in embedded EOS (i.e., ceftriaxone, ciprofloxacin, clindamycin, moxifloxacin) and predicted prescribing shifts to antibiotics in the embedded EOS (i.e., amoxicillin-clavulanate, azithromycin and sulfamethoxazole-trimethoprim) using Days of Therapy (DOT)/1000 patient-days (PD). Paired t-test was used to compare antibiotic usage pre- and post-intervention. RESULTS: The usage of standalone EOS remained similar pre- and post-intervention except for a 16-fold increased usage of CDI EOS. There were large increases in uptake of the embedded EOS compared with the standalone EOS: 11-fold () increase for CAP, 47-fold () increase for UTI and 24-fold () increase for cellulitis. In addition, there was a statistically significant decrease in ciprofloxacin (mean 16.6 DOT/1000-PD vs. 13.6 DOT/1000-PD, P = 0.026) and moxifloxacin usage (mean 9.3 DOT/1000-PD vs. 5.2 DOT/1000-PD) during the study time period. CONCLUSION: Our study showed that simplifying AS EOS and embedding these into a more commonly used EOS is associated with a significant increase in EOS usage and uptake of AS recommended empiric antibiotics with a decrease in fluoroquinolone usage. [Image: see text] [Image: see text] DISCLOSURES: All authors: No reported disclosures. Oxford University Press 2019-10-23 /pmc/articles/PMC6811036/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofz360.910 Text en © The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial reproduction and distribution of the work, in any medium, provided the original work is not altered or transformed in any way, and that the work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Abstracts
Chan, April
Kapur, Ajay
Langford, Bradley
Downing, Mark
1046. Evaluating the outcomes of embedding Antimicrobial Stewardship order sets in the General Medicine Admission Electronic Order Set: A Retrospective Study
title 1046. Evaluating the outcomes of embedding Antimicrobial Stewardship order sets in the General Medicine Admission Electronic Order Set: A Retrospective Study
title_full 1046. Evaluating the outcomes of embedding Antimicrobial Stewardship order sets in the General Medicine Admission Electronic Order Set: A Retrospective Study
title_fullStr 1046. Evaluating the outcomes of embedding Antimicrobial Stewardship order sets in the General Medicine Admission Electronic Order Set: A Retrospective Study
title_full_unstemmed 1046. Evaluating the outcomes of embedding Antimicrobial Stewardship order sets in the General Medicine Admission Electronic Order Set: A Retrospective Study
title_short 1046. Evaluating the outcomes of embedding Antimicrobial Stewardship order sets in the General Medicine Admission Electronic Order Set: A Retrospective Study
title_sort 1046. evaluating the outcomes of embedding antimicrobial stewardship order sets in the general medicine admission electronic order set: a retrospective study
topic Abstracts
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6811036/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofz360.910
work_keys_str_mv AT chanapril 1046evaluatingtheoutcomesofembeddingantimicrobialstewardshipordersetsinthegeneralmedicineadmissionelectronicordersetaretrospectivestudy
AT kapurajay 1046evaluatingtheoutcomesofembeddingantimicrobialstewardshipordersetsinthegeneralmedicineadmissionelectronicordersetaretrospectivestudy
AT langfordbradley 1046evaluatingtheoutcomesofembeddingantimicrobialstewardshipordersetsinthegeneralmedicineadmissionelectronicordersetaretrospectivestudy
AT downingmark 1046evaluatingtheoutcomesofembeddingantimicrobialstewardshipordersetsinthegeneralmedicineadmissionelectronicordersetaretrospectivestudy