748. Does Improving Discharge Documentation Improve Post-Discharge Care for Patients on Outpatient Parenteral Antimicrobial Therapy (OPAT)?

BACKGROUND: Patients discharged on intravenous antibiotics require regular monitoring by an infectious disease (ID) specialist or other provider familiar with outpatient parenteral antibiotic therapy (OPAT). However, the lab monitoring and outpatient follow-up plan outlined prior to discharge is not always realized. We are working to understand what steps the discharging hospital can take to improve the outpatient monitoring and follow-up for patients on OPAT, who are discharged to a wide variety of institutions. We studied whether documenting the OPAT plan in a standardized note led to increased inclusion of that plan in the discharge documentation and thus to improved lab monitoring and outpatient follow-up for our patients. METHODS: We compared the pre- and post-intervention frequency of seven key OPAT elements (antibiotic, duration, end date, indication, follow-up appointment, recommend labs, fax number for labs) in the discharge documentation. Pre-intervention, this information was documented by the inpatient ID service in the Problem List (overview) section of the electronic health record. Post-intervention, OPAT plans were documented within standardized OPAT Progress Notes. Efficiency and clinical outcomes were: proportion of OPAT treatment weeks with laboratory monitoring; number of weeks the outpatient ID team had to track down missing laboratory results; number of “No Show” ID clinic visits; number of OPAT-related telephone encounters. RESULTS: There were 73 patients in the pre- and 68 in the post-intervention cohort. Having a formal OPAT Progress Note was associated with a significant increase in the number of OPAT elements included in the discharge documentation (7 vs. 5, P = 0.002). In addition, the entire OPAT note was included in the discharge documentation more frequently in the post-intervention cohort (3/73 vs.. 14/68, P = 0.007). However, except for reduced telephone encounters related to OPAT (2 vs. 1 per patient, P = 0.0001), there were no significant improvements in post-discharge clinical or efficiency outcomes. CONCLUSION: Creating an OPAT Progress Note improves the capture of OPAT elements into discharge documentation. Except for reducing telephone encounters, no other benefits occurred. Future interventions will focus on improving the other measured outcomes. DISCLOSURES: All authors: No reported disclosures.