Cargando…
1087. Fluoroquinolone Prophylaxis vs. No Bacterial Prophylaxis in Hospitalized Neutropenic Patients Undergoing Induction Chemotherapy for Acute Myeloid Leukemia
BACKGROUND: Despite evidence to support outpatient anti-pseudomonal fluoroquinolone (FQ) prophylaxis in neutropenic patients, limited data exist to support this for inpatients undergoing induction chemotherapy for acute myeloid leukemia (AML). At our institution, we implemented an initiative to repl...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6811052/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofz360.951 |
_version_ | 1783462385536729088 |
---|---|
author | Buchanan, Carley Bremmer, Derek N Koget, Anna Moffa, Matthew Shively, Nathan Patel, Monank Walsh, Thomas L |
author_facet | Buchanan, Carley Bremmer, Derek N Koget, Anna Moffa, Matthew Shively, Nathan Patel, Monank Walsh, Thomas L |
author_sort | Buchanan, Carley |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Despite evidence to support outpatient anti-pseudomonal fluoroquinolone (FQ) prophylaxis in neutropenic patients, limited data exist to support this for inpatients undergoing induction chemotherapy for acute myeloid leukemia (AML). At our institution, we implemented an initiative to replace FQ prophylaxis with a conditional order for an anti-pseudomonal β-lactam to be given if a fever occurred. METHODS: A retrospective chart review was conducted to analyze the outcome differences between patients receiving FQ prophylaxis (pre-intervention) and those who had a conditional order for an anti-pseudomonal β-lactam in place of FQ prophylaxis (post-intervention). Patients were included if they were ≥18 years of age and were newly diagnosed with AML undergoing induction chemotherapy. The primary outcome was 90-day all-cause mortality. Secondary outcomes included the number of patients requiring ICU admission and rate of bacteremic episodes caused by any pathogen and from a Gram-negative rod (GNR). Additionally, ciprofloxacin susceptibility of these pathogens was analyzed. RESULTS: There were 35 and 26 patients in the pre- and post-intervention groups, respectively. Between pre- and post-intervention groups, there was no difference in 90-day mortality (20.0% vs. 15.4%; P = 0.745) or ICU admissions (25.7% vs. 23.1%, P = 1), respectively. The rate of any bacteremic episode was similar between the pre- and post-intervention groups (51.4% vs. 65.4%; P = 0.307), but more patients in the post-intervention group developed GNR bacteremia (17.1% vs. 46.2%; P = 0.023). In the patients with GNR bacteremia, the number of ciprofloxacin nonsusceptible isolates was higher in the pre-intervention group (100% vs. 30.7%; P = 0.011). CONCLUSION: Replacing FQ prophylaxis with a conditional order for an anti-pseudomonal β-lactam for inpatients newly diagnosed with AML receiving induction chemotherapy is a feasible option to decrease FQ exposure. Though increased episodes of GNR bacteremia were observed, there was no difference in total bacteremic episodes or clinical outcomes, and the improved ciprofloxacin susceptibility patterns will allow for an additional treatment option in this extremely vulnerable patient population. [Image: see text] DISCLOSURES: All authors: No reported disclosures. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6811052 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-68110522019-10-28 1087. Fluoroquinolone Prophylaxis vs. No Bacterial Prophylaxis in Hospitalized Neutropenic Patients Undergoing Induction Chemotherapy for Acute Myeloid Leukemia Buchanan, Carley Bremmer, Derek N Koget, Anna Moffa, Matthew Shively, Nathan Patel, Monank Walsh, Thomas L Open Forum Infect Dis Abstracts BACKGROUND: Despite evidence to support outpatient anti-pseudomonal fluoroquinolone (FQ) prophylaxis in neutropenic patients, limited data exist to support this for inpatients undergoing induction chemotherapy for acute myeloid leukemia (AML). At our institution, we implemented an initiative to replace FQ prophylaxis with a conditional order for an anti-pseudomonal β-lactam to be given if a fever occurred. METHODS: A retrospective chart review was conducted to analyze the outcome differences between patients receiving FQ prophylaxis (pre-intervention) and those who had a conditional order for an anti-pseudomonal β-lactam in place of FQ prophylaxis (post-intervention). Patients were included if they were ≥18 years of age and were newly diagnosed with AML undergoing induction chemotherapy. The primary outcome was 90-day all-cause mortality. Secondary outcomes included the number of patients requiring ICU admission and rate of bacteremic episodes caused by any pathogen and from a Gram-negative rod (GNR). Additionally, ciprofloxacin susceptibility of these pathogens was analyzed. RESULTS: There were 35 and 26 patients in the pre- and post-intervention groups, respectively. Between pre- and post-intervention groups, there was no difference in 90-day mortality (20.0% vs. 15.4%; P = 0.745) or ICU admissions (25.7% vs. 23.1%, P = 1), respectively. The rate of any bacteremic episode was similar between the pre- and post-intervention groups (51.4% vs. 65.4%; P = 0.307), but more patients in the post-intervention group developed GNR bacteremia (17.1% vs. 46.2%; P = 0.023). In the patients with GNR bacteremia, the number of ciprofloxacin nonsusceptible isolates was higher in the pre-intervention group (100% vs. 30.7%; P = 0.011). CONCLUSION: Replacing FQ prophylaxis with a conditional order for an anti-pseudomonal β-lactam for inpatients newly diagnosed with AML receiving induction chemotherapy is a feasible option to decrease FQ exposure. Though increased episodes of GNR bacteremia were observed, there was no difference in total bacteremic episodes or clinical outcomes, and the improved ciprofloxacin susceptibility patterns will allow for an additional treatment option in this extremely vulnerable patient population. [Image: see text] DISCLOSURES: All authors: No reported disclosures. Oxford University Press 2019-10-23 /pmc/articles/PMC6811052/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofz360.951 Text en © The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial reproduction and distribution of the work, in any medium, provided the original work is not altered or transformed in any way, and that the work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com |
spellingShingle | Abstracts Buchanan, Carley Bremmer, Derek N Koget, Anna Moffa, Matthew Shively, Nathan Patel, Monank Walsh, Thomas L 1087. Fluoroquinolone Prophylaxis vs. No Bacterial Prophylaxis in Hospitalized Neutropenic Patients Undergoing Induction Chemotherapy for Acute Myeloid Leukemia |
title | 1087. Fluoroquinolone Prophylaxis vs. No Bacterial Prophylaxis in Hospitalized Neutropenic Patients Undergoing Induction Chemotherapy for Acute Myeloid Leukemia |
title_full | 1087. Fluoroquinolone Prophylaxis vs. No Bacterial Prophylaxis in Hospitalized Neutropenic Patients Undergoing Induction Chemotherapy for Acute Myeloid Leukemia |
title_fullStr | 1087. Fluoroquinolone Prophylaxis vs. No Bacterial Prophylaxis in Hospitalized Neutropenic Patients Undergoing Induction Chemotherapy for Acute Myeloid Leukemia |
title_full_unstemmed | 1087. Fluoroquinolone Prophylaxis vs. No Bacterial Prophylaxis in Hospitalized Neutropenic Patients Undergoing Induction Chemotherapy for Acute Myeloid Leukemia |
title_short | 1087. Fluoroquinolone Prophylaxis vs. No Bacterial Prophylaxis in Hospitalized Neutropenic Patients Undergoing Induction Chemotherapy for Acute Myeloid Leukemia |
title_sort | 1087. fluoroquinolone prophylaxis vs. no bacterial prophylaxis in hospitalized neutropenic patients undergoing induction chemotherapy for acute myeloid leukemia |
topic | Abstracts |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6811052/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofz360.951 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT buchanancarley 1087fluoroquinoloneprophylaxisvsnobacterialprophylaxisinhospitalizedneutropenicpatientsundergoinginductionchemotherapyforacutemyeloidleukemia AT bremmerderekn 1087fluoroquinoloneprophylaxisvsnobacterialprophylaxisinhospitalizedneutropenicpatientsundergoinginductionchemotherapyforacutemyeloidleukemia AT kogetanna 1087fluoroquinoloneprophylaxisvsnobacterialprophylaxisinhospitalizedneutropenicpatientsundergoinginductionchemotherapyforacutemyeloidleukemia AT moffamatthew 1087fluoroquinoloneprophylaxisvsnobacterialprophylaxisinhospitalizedneutropenicpatientsundergoinginductionchemotherapyforacutemyeloidleukemia AT shivelynathan 1087fluoroquinoloneprophylaxisvsnobacterialprophylaxisinhospitalizedneutropenicpatientsundergoinginductionchemotherapyforacutemyeloidleukemia AT patelmonank 1087fluoroquinoloneprophylaxisvsnobacterialprophylaxisinhospitalizedneutropenicpatientsundergoinginductionchemotherapyforacutemyeloidleukemia AT walshthomasl 1087fluoroquinoloneprophylaxisvsnobacterialprophylaxisinhospitalizedneutropenicpatientsundergoinginductionchemotherapyforacutemyeloidleukemia |