Cargando…
571. Determining the Utility of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Nares Screening in Antimicrobial Stewardship
BACKGROUND: Treatment of suspected Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) is a cornerstone of many antibiotic regimens; however, some anti-MRSA antibiotics are associated with toxicity. The Veterans Affairs (VA) screens each patient on admission for MRSA nares colonization. The objective...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6811055/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofz360.640 |
_version_ | 1783462386322112512 |
---|---|
author | Mergenhagen, Kari A Victor, Kaitlyn Sellick, John Wattengel, Bethany A Sumon, Zarchi Lesse, Alan |
author_facet | Mergenhagen, Kari A Victor, Kaitlyn Sellick, John Wattengel, Bethany A Sumon, Zarchi Lesse, Alan |
author_sort | Mergenhagen, Kari A |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Treatment of suspected Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) is a cornerstone of many antibiotic regimens; however, some anti-MRSA antibiotics are associated with toxicity. The Veterans Affairs (VA) screens each patient on admission for MRSA nares colonization. The objective of this study was to determine whether MRSA nares screening can be used as a stewardship tool for de-escalation as well as avoidance of anti-MRSA therapy. METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study across VA medical centers nationwide from January 1, 2007 to January 1, 2018. Data from patients with MRSA nares screening were obtained from the Corporate Data Warehouse. Subsequent clinical cultures within 7 days of the nares swab were evaluated for the presence of MRSA. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive values (PPVs), and negative predictive values (NPVs) were calculated for the entire cohort, as well as subgroups for specific culture sites. Cultures were considered to be from a sterile site if they were from a fluid/aspirate, bone, tissue, or blood taken from the periphery. NPVs and PPVs were calculated for each of these sterile sites. RESULTS: A total of 447,579 clinical cultures were included in the final analysis. The NPV of MRSA nares screening for ruling out MRSA was 95.7% for all cultures submitted. The sensitivity and specificity for positive clinical cultures were 67.4% and 83%, respectively. The NPV for bloodstream infections (n = 64,128) was 96.2% for intra-abdominal cultures (n = 8,071) was 97.9%, for respiratory cultures (n = 75,242) was 95.3%, for wound cultures (n = 95,832) was 90.4%, and for renal cultures (n = 164,330) was 99.1%. NPVs for sterile sites are as follows: intra-abdominal (n = 7,426) was 98.1%, respiratory (n = 15,583) was 95.2%, wound (n = 51,793) was 91%. CONCLUSION: MRSA nares screening has a high NPV and specificity for ruling out potential MRSA infections at a variety of culture sites including bloodstream, intra-abdominal, respiratory, renal, and wounds. MRSA nares screening is a powerful stewardship tool for de-escalation and avoidance of empirical anti-MRSA therapy. [Image: see text] DISCLOSURES: All authors: No reported disclosures. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6811055 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-68110552019-10-28 571. Determining the Utility of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Nares Screening in Antimicrobial Stewardship Mergenhagen, Kari A Victor, Kaitlyn Sellick, John Wattengel, Bethany A Sumon, Zarchi Lesse, Alan Open Forum Infect Dis Abstracts BACKGROUND: Treatment of suspected Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) is a cornerstone of many antibiotic regimens; however, some anti-MRSA antibiotics are associated with toxicity. The Veterans Affairs (VA) screens each patient on admission for MRSA nares colonization. The objective of this study was to determine whether MRSA nares screening can be used as a stewardship tool for de-escalation as well as avoidance of anti-MRSA therapy. METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study across VA medical centers nationwide from January 1, 2007 to January 1, 2018. Data from patients with MRSA nares screening were obtained from the Corporate Data Warehouse. Subsequent clinical cultures within 7 days of the nares swab were evaluated for the presence of MRSA. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive values (PPVs), and negative predictive values (NPVs) were calculated for the entire cohort, as well as subgroups for specific culture sites. Cultures were considered to be from a sterile site if they were from a fluid/aspirate, bone, tissue, or blood taken from the periphery. NPVs and PPVs were calculated for each of these sterile sites. RESULTS: A total of 447,579 clinical cultures were included in the final analysis. The NPV of MRSA nares screening for ruling out MRSA was 95.7% for all cultures submitted. The sensitivity and specificity for positive clinical cultures were 67.4% and 83%, respectively. The NPV for bloodstream infections (n = 64,128) was 96.2% for intra-abdominal cultures (n = 8,071) was 97.9%, for respiratory cultures (n = 75,242) was 95.3%, for wound cultures (n = 95,832) was 90.4%, and for renal cultures (n = 164,330) was 99.1%. NPVs for sterile sites are as follows: intra-abdominal (n = 7,426) was 98.1%, respiratory (n = 15,583) was 95.2%, wound (n = 51,793) was 91%. CONCLUSION: MRSA nares screening has a high NPV and specificity for ruling out potential MRSA infections at a variety of culture sites including bloodstream, intra-abdominal, respiratory, renal, and wounds. MRSA nares screening is a powerful stewardship tool for de-escalation and avoidance of empirical anti-MRSA therapy. [Image: see text] DISCLOSURES: All authors: No reported disclosures. Oxford University Press 2019-10-23 /pmc/articles/PMC6811055/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofz360.640 Text en © The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial reproduction and distribution of the work, in any medium, provided the original work is not altered or transformed in any way, and that the work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com |
spellingShingle | Abstracts Mergenhagen, Kari A Victor, Kaitlyn Sellick, John Wattengel, Bethany A Sumon, Zarchi Lesse, Alan 571. Determining the Utility of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Nares Screening in Antimicrobial Stewardship |
title | 571. Determining the Utility of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Nares Screening in Antimicrobial Stewardship |
title_full | 571. Determining the Utility of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Nares Screening in Antimicrobial Stewardship |
title_fullStr | 571. Determining the Utility of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Nares Screening in Antimicrobial Stewardship |
title_full_unstemmed | 571. Determining the Utility of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Nares Screening in Antimicrobial Stewardship |
title_short | 571. Determining the Utility of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Nares Screening in Antimicrobial Stewardship |
title_sort | 571. determining the utility of methicillin-resistant staphylococcus aureus nares screening in antimicrobial stewardship |
topic | Abstracts |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6811055/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofz360.640 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT mergenhagenkaria 571determiningtheutilityofmethicillinresistantstaphylococcusaureusnaresscreeninginantimicrobialstewardship AT victorkaitlyn 571determiningtheutilityofmethicillinresistantstaphylococcusaureusnaresscreeninginantimicrobialstewardship AT sellickjohn 571determiningtheutilityofmethicillinresistantstaphylococcusaureusnaresscreeninginantimicrobialstewardship AT wattengelbethanya 571determiningtheutilityofmethicillinresistantstaphylococcusaureusnaresscreeninginantimicrobialstewardship AT sumonzarchi 571determiningtheutilityofmethicillinresistantstaphylococcusaureusnaresscreeninginantimicrobialstewardship AT lessealan 571determiningtheutilityofmethicillinresistantstaphylococcusaureusnaresscreeninginantimicrobialstewardship |