Cargando…

1100. Facility Factors Are a Stronger Driver of Peri-Operative Vancomycin Use Than Patient Risk Factors

BACKGROUND: Prior reports suggest that the use of vancomycin for surgical prophylaxis is common and increasing. However, rates of administration and reasons for choosing vancomycin are unknown. Thus, we sought to quantify the frequency of vancomycin as a surgical prophylaxis agent and to determine d...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Branch-Elliman, Westyn, O’Brien, William, Strymish, Judith, Itani, Kamal, Gupta, Kalpana
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6811058/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofz360.964
_version_ 1783462387063455744
author Branch-Elliman, Westyn
O’Brien, William
Strymish, Judith
Itani, Kamal
Gupta, Kalpana
author_facet Branch-Elliman, Westyn
O’Brien, William
Strymish, Judith
Itani, Kamal
Gupta, Kalpana
author_sort Branch-Elliman, Westyn
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Prior reports suggest that the use of vancomycin for surgical prophylaxis is common and increasing. However, rates of administration and reasons for choosing vancomycin are unknown. Thus, we sought to quantify the frequency of vancomycin as a surgical prophylaxis agent and to determine drivers of use. METHODS: All Veteran patients undergoing major cardiac, orthopedic total joint, vascular, or colorectal procedures and entered into the VA External Peer Review Program (EPRP) database during the period from October 1, 2008 to September 30, 2013 were included. EPRP includes a manual review of surgical cases to measure type of prophylaxis, and, in the case of vancomycin, clinician-documented reasons for vancomycin use (β-lactam allergy, patient at high risk of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), facility high rate of MRSA). Descriptive statistics were used to evaluate findings. RESULTS: Among 79, 058 surgical procedures at 109 different medical centers, 20,349 (25.7%) received vancomycin either alone or in combination with another agent for prophylaxis. Rates of vancomycin use were the highest for cardiac surgeries (10,455/21,396, 48.9%), followed by orthopedic total joint replacement surgeries (8,044/38,675, 20.8%), vascular surgeries (1,504/8,177, 18.4%) and colorectal surgeries (346/10,810, 3.2%). The most common reason for vancomycin use was a perceived high facility rate of MRSA (7,367, 36.2%) followed by β-lactam allergy (4,855, 23.9%) and high-risk patient (1,420/20,349, 7.0%). There was no reason documented in 5,194 (25.5%). The most common reason for vancomycin use differed by surgical type. Among cardiac and orthopedic cases, high facility rate was the most commonly reported reason, but β-lactam allergy was the most common driver among vascular and colorectal procedures. CONCLUSION: Facility factors are a major driver of peri-operative vancomycin use, more so than β-lactam allergy or patient-level factors, particularly in cardiac and orthopedic surgery. These data suggest that facility-level interventions, such as implementation of specific guidelines, may be helpful for limiting vancomycin use in this population. DISCLOSURES: All authors: No reported disclosures.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6811058
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-68110582019-10-28 1100. Facility Factors Are a Stronger Driver of Peri-Operative Vancomycin Use Than Patient Risk Factors Branch-Elliman, Westyn O’Brien, William Strymish, Judith Itani, Kamal Gupta, Kalpana Open Forum Infect Dis Abstracts BACKGROUND: Prior reports suggest that the use of vancomycin for surgical prophylaxis is common and increasing. However, rates of administration and reasons for choosing vancomycin are unknown. Thus, we sought to quantify the frequency of vancomycin as a surgical prophylaxis agent and to determine drivers of use. METHODS: All Veteran patients undergoing major cardiac, orthopedic total joint, vascular, or colorectal procedures and entered into the VA External Peer Review Program (EPRP) database during the period from October 1, 2008 to September 30, 2013 were included. EPRP includes a manual review of surgical cases to measure type of prophylaxis, and, in the case of vancomycin, clinician-documented reasons for vancomycin use (β-lactam allergy, patient at high risk of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), facility high rate of MRSA). Descriptive statistics were used to evaluate findings. RESULTS: Among 79, 058 surgical procedures at 109 different medical centers, 20,349 (25.7%) received vancomycin either alone or in combination with another agent for prophylaxis. Rates of vancomycin use were the highest for cardiac surgeries (10,455/21,396, 48.9%), followed by orthopedic total joint replacement surgeries (8,044/38,675, 20.8%), vascular surgeries (1,504/8,177, 18.4%) and colorectal surgeries (346/10,810, 3.2%). The most common reason for vancomycin use was a perceived high facility rate of MRSA (7,367, 36.2%) followed by β-lactam allergy (4,855, 23.9%) and high-risk patient (1,420/20,349, 7.0%). There was no reason documented in 5,194 (25.5%). The most common reason for vancomycin use differed by surgical type. Among cardiac and orthopedic cases, high facility rate was the most commonly reported reason, but β-lactam allergy was the most common driver among vascular and colorectal procedures. CONCLUSION: Facility factors are a major driver of peri-operative vancomycin use, more so than β-lactam allergy or patient-level factors, particularly in cardiac and orthopedic surgery. These data suggest that facility-level interventions, such as implementation of specific guidelines, may be helpful for limiting vancomycin use in this population. DISCLOSURES: All authors: No reported disclosures. Oxford University Press 2019-10-23 /pmc/articles/PMC6811058/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofz360.964 Text en © The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial reproduction and distribution of the work, in any medium, provided the original work is not altered or transformed in any way, and that the work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Abstracts
Branch-Elliman, Westyn
O’Brien, William
Strymish, Judith
Itani, Kamal
Gupta, Kalpana
1100. Facility Factors Are a Stronger Driver of Peri-Operative Vancomycin Use Than Patient Risk Factors
title 1100. Facility Factors Are a Stronger Driver of Peri-Operative Vancomycin Use Than Patient Risk Factors
title_full 1100. Facility Factors Are a Stronger Driver of Peri-Operative Vancomycin Use Than Patient Risk Factors
title_fullStr 1100. Facility Factors Are a Stronger Driver of Peri-Operative Vancomycin Use Than Patient Risk Factors
title_full_unstemmed 1100. Facility Factors Are a Stronger Driver of Peri-Operative Vancomycin Use Than Patient Risk Factors
title_short 1100. Facility Factors Are a Stronger Driver of Peri-Operative Vancomycin Use Than Patient Risk Factors
title_sort 1100. facility factors are a stronger driver of peri-operative vancomycin use than patient risk factors
topic Abstracts
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6811058/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofz360.964
work_keys_str_mv AT branchellimanwestyn 1100facilityfactorsareastrongerdriverofperioperativevancomycinusethanpatientriskfactors
AT obrienwilliam 1100facilityfactorsareastrongerdriverofperioperativevancomycinusethanpatientriskfactors
AT strymishjudith 1100facilityfactorsareastrongerdriverofperioperativevancomycinusethanpatientriskfactors
AT itanikamal 1100facilityfactorsareastrongerdriverofperioperativevancomycinusethanpatientriskfactors
AT guptakalpana 1100facilityfactorsareastrongerdriverofperioperativevancomycinusethanpatientriskfactors