Cargando…

1093. Evaluation of an Antimicrobial Stewardship Elective Rotation for Medicine Residents

BACKGROUND: In 2017, an Antibiotic Stewardship (ASP) elective was established for the medicine residents to engage directly in stewardship practice, learn how to communicate recommendations effectively to their peers, and gain further understanding of the rationale for antimicrobial stewardship. Rec...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Watanabe, Mika, Jeng, Arthur, Kim, Brian
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6811100/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofz360.957
_version_ 1783462398550605824
author Watanabe, Mika
Jeng, Arthur
Kim, Brian
author_facet Watanabe, Mika
Jeng, Arthur
Kim, Brian
author_sort Watanabe, Mika
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: In 2017, an Antibiotic Stewardship (ASP) elective was established for the medicine residents to engage directly in stewardship practice, learn how to communicate recommendations effectively to their peers, and gain further understanding of the rationale for antimicrobial stewardship. Recommendations are co-formulated with the ID Pharmacist and ID Attending Physician, and documented as an ASP Note in the electronic health record. Additionally, the residents disseminate recommendations via page and verbal communication to their peers. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the response of the primary care teams to guidance formulated and communicated by the residents while on this clinical elective. METHODS: Recommendations by the medicine residents participating on the ASP elective from January 2018 to July 2018 were reviewed. Response to the recommendations was categorized as accepted, not accepted, or partially accepted with alternative change. Recommendations were considered as accepted if changes were made by the primary team within 24 hours from time of the ASP note. Responses were further reviewed based on the following medical services: medicine (including hematology/oncology), surgery, and intensive care (ICU). RESULTS: A total of 124 recommendations were reviewed for response.11 of the patients were excluded as changes either occurred prior to the documentation of the ASP note, or proposed changes did not pertain to antibiotic management. Ninety-four of the included interventions were accepted. Medicine, surgery, and ICU services accepted 84%, 82.4%, and 83.3% of recommendations, respectively. The services did not accept 5%, 11.8%, and 11.1% of recommendations, and partial acceptance with alternative changes was 11%, 5.8%, and 5.6%, respectively. CONCLUSION: Recommendations formulated and communicated by residents participating in the ASP Elective rotation resulted in a high degree of acceptance. The acceptance rates did not differ significantly between the medical services. The addition of the ASP Elective has demonstrated a benefit to the ASP program at Olive View-UCLA Medical Center, and other medical residency training programs should consider implementation of such an elective rotation to enhance stewardship efforts and medical resident education. DISCLOSURES: All authors: No reported disclosures.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6811100
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-68111002019-10-28 1093. Evaluation of an Antimicrobial Stewardship Elective Rotation for Medicine Residents Watanabe, Mika Jeng, Arthur Kim, Brian Open Forum Infect Dis Abstracts BACKGROUND: In 2017, an Antibiotic Stewardship (ASP) elective was established for the medicine residents to engage directly in stewardship practice, learn how to communicate recommendations effectively to their peers, and gain further understanding of the rationale for antimicrobial stewardship. Recommendations are co-formulated with the ID Pharmacist and ID Attending Physician, and documented as an ASP Note in the electronic health record. Additionally, the residents disseminate recommendations via page and verbal communication to their peers. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the response of the primary care teams to guidance formulated and communicated by the residents while on this clinical elective. METHODS: Recommendations by the medicine residents participating on the ASP elective from January 2018 to July 2018 were reviewed. Response to the recommendations was categorized as accepted, not accepted, or partially accepted with alternative change. Recommendations were considered as accepted if changes were made by the primary team within 24 hours from time of the ASP note. Responses were further reviewed based on the following medical services: medicine (including hematology/oncology), surgery, and intensive care (ICU). RESULTS: A total of 124 recommendations were reviewed for response.11 of the patients were excluded as changes either occurred prior to the documentation of the ASP note, or proposed changes did not pertain to antibiotic management. Ninety-four of the included interventions were accepted. Medicine, surgery, and ICU services accepted 84%, 82.4%, and 83.3% of recommendations, respectively. The services did not accept 5%, 11.8%, and 11.1% of recommendations, and partial acceptance with alternative changes was 11%, 5.8%, and 5.6%, respectively. CONCLUSION: Recommendations formulated and communicated by residents participating in the ASP Elective rotation resulted in a high degree of acceptance. The acceptance rates did not differ significantly between the medical services. The addition of the ASP Elective has demonstrated a benefit to the ASP program at Olive View-UCLA Medical Center, and other medical residency training programs should consider implementation of such an elective rotation to enhance stewardship efforts and medical resident education. DISCLOSURES: All authors: No reported disclosures. Oxford University Press 2019-10-23 /pmc/articles/PMC6811100/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofz360.957 Text en © The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial reproduction and distribution of the work, in any medium, provided the original work is not altered or transformed in any way, and that the work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Abstracts
Watanabe, Mika
Jeng, Arthur
Kim, Brian
1093. Evaluation of an Antimicrobial Stewardship Elective Rotation for Medicine Residents
title 1093. Evaluation of an Antimicrobial Stewardship Elective Rotation for Medicine Residents
title_full 1093. Evaluation of an Antimicrobial Stewardship Elective Rotation for Medicine Residents
title_fullStr 1093. Evaluation of an Antimicrobial Stewardship Elective Rotation for Medicine Residents
title_full_unstemmed 1093. Evaluation of an Antimicrobial Stewardship Elective Rotation for Medicine Residents
title_short 1093. Evaluation of an Antimicrobial Stewardship Elective Rotation for Medicine Residents
title_sort 1093. evaluation of an antimicrobial stewardship elective rotation for medicine residents
topic Abstracts
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6811100/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofz360.957
work_keys_str_mv AT watanabemika 1093evaluationofanantimicrobialstewardshipelectiverotationformedicineresidents
AT jengarthur 1093evaluationofanantimicrobialstewardshipelectiverotationformedicineresidents
AT kimbrian 1093evaluationofanantimicrobialstewardshipelectiverotationformedicineresidents