Cargando…

531. Practical and Evidence-Based Considerations for Implementation of Bacterial Whole-Genome Sequencing Within Longitudinal Infection Control Practice

BACKGROUND: Whole-genome sequencing (WGS) of bacteria is becoming a routine tool within microbiology, yet its utility to help guide infection control (IC) practice longitudinally is underexplored. As with any technology adopted in the hospital, the integration of WGS into IC practice must be careful...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chen, Donald S, Quinn, Moira, Sussner, Rita M, Wang, Guiqing, Fallon, John T, Chanza, Melissa, Doty, Alan J, Ashworth, Judy L, Kelleher, Steven W, Holler, Devon J, Fortunato-habib, Mary M, Loving, Joshua, Abdolahi, Amir, Carmona, Juan J, Gross, Brian D
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6811132/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofz360.600
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: Whole-genome sequencing (WGS) of bacteria is becoming a routine tool within microbiology, yet its utility to help guide infection control (IC) practice longitudinally is underexplored. As with any technology adopted in the hospital, the integration of WGS into IC practice must be carefully managed and considered. We qualitatively report an evidence-based implementation workflow that considers WGS to help proactively guide IC professionals during investigation of infectious outbreaks. METHODS: We built upon lessons learned in an ongoing surveillance effort at a tertiary care hospital—utilizing retrospective WGS data within the Philips IntelliSpace Epidemiology system—to understand facilitators and barriers to the use of bacterial WGS longitudinally to inform IC workflow. Our team established a 9-month workgroup to study the practical aspects of implementing WGS in routine IC practice. From expert opinion collected via the workgroup, in addition to evidence from the literature, a workflow guidance document and checklist were codified. New ideas included incorporating education to promote the establishment of an IC triage process. RESULTS: Facilitators to implementation included ability to display genomic relatedness alongside relevant patient data to enable clinical actionability, ability to pivot time and resources rapidly when infections are a pseudo outbreak (false positive) or missed outbreak (false negative), opportunities for nuanced staff education, and willingness to be a first-of-kind adopter. Barriers were communication of genomic concepts to IC professionals and relevant institutional stakeholders, maintaining sharable notes of active investigations to promote data-sharing practices, and timing and review of relevant interventions into the facility workflow. Strategies to address these issues are considered. CONCLUSION: This study provides a novel framework for adaptation of existing IC workflow strategies to leverage the utility of bacterial WGS, and it presents a schema to effectively engage relevant stakeholders, based on an analysis of the unique challenges inherent within IC practice. It also offers an innovative model for the development and implementation of IC workflows to account for, and adapt to, site-specific conditions. DISCLOSURES: All authors: No reported disclosures.