Cargando…

744. Antifungal De-escalation Strategy in ICU Patients: Clinical Success and Cost Savings

BACKGROUND: The incidence of Candida spp infections in critically ill patients is increasing. Initial broad-spectrum empiric antifungal agents (e.g., echinocandins), followed by immediate switching to fluconazole if isolates are fluconazole sensitive could be a low-cost de-escalation strategy. The a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: magira, Eleni, Kalogianni, Athanasia-Aikaterini, Zakynthinos, Spyros
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6811146/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofz360.812
_version_ 1783462409873129472
author magira, Eleni
Kalogianni, Athanasia-Aikaterini
Zakynthinos, Spyros
author_facet magira, Eleni
Kalogianni, Athanasia-Aikaterini
Zakynthinos, Spyros
author_sort magira, Eleni
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The incidence of Candida spp infections in critically ill patients is increasing. Initial broad-spectrum empiric antifungal agents (e.g., echinocandins), followed by immediate switching to fluconazole if isolates are fluconazole sensitive could be a low-cost de-escalation strategy. The aim of this study was to evaluate the budget impact of the de-escalation strategy using fungostatin in ICU patients and clinical effectiveness. METHODS: This prospective study was conducted in a 30-bed mixed ICU, from January 2015 through January 2017. Critically ill patients with invasive candidiasis were placed on initial empiric broad-spectrum antifungal agents either on echinocandins or liposomal amphoteric B. De-escalation to fungostatin strategy at day 3 vs. patients without de-escalation were compared. Clinical characteristics and the presence of clinical success by the eighth-day of treatment and 28-day outcome were evaluated. Clinical success was defined as the complete eradication of Candida spp. in blood cultures. Economic outcomes included budget impact was also evaluated. RESULTS: Forty-seven ICU patients with documented invasive candidemia enrolled and received empiric broad-spectrum antifungal agents with either echinocandins or liposomal amphotericin B. Of those, 22 (47%) were eligible for de-escalation at day 3 to fungostatin based on susceptibility test for fungi. Specific Candida species isolated in the de-escalation group were C. albicans (14, 64%), and non-C. albicans (8, 36%). Interestingly 6/22 (27%) invasive candidemia de-escalated cases relapsed by day 8 of initiation of the empiric therapy, vs. 2/25 (8%) of the control group (P = 0.12). Survival rates at day 28 were not statistically significant among the two groups [15/22 (68%) vs. 11/25 (44%), P = 0.12]. The budget impact of using de-escalation was greater, producing cost savings of €3,200 per patient but did not translate into significant clinical and mycological success. CONCLUSION: Critically ill patients who had received empiric antifungal therapy for documented candidemia and underwent de-escalation from echinocandins or liposomal ambisome B to fungostatin had a potential economic cost–benefit but did not associate with significantly improved clinical success rates. DISCLOSURES: All authors: No reported disclosures.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6811146
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-68111462019-10-29 744. Antifungal De-escalation Strategy in ICU Patients: Clinical Success and Cost Savings magira, Eleni Kalogianni, Athanasia-Aikaterini Zakynthinos, Spyros Open Forum Infect Dis Abstracts BACKGROUND: The incidence of Candida spp infections in critically ill patients is increasing. Initial broad-spectrum empiric antifungal agents (e.g., echinocandins), followed by immediate switching to fluconazole if isolates are fluconazole sensitive could be a low-cost de-escalation strategy. The aim of this study was to evaluate the budget impact of the de-escalation strategy using fungostatin in ICU patients and clinical effectiveness. METHODS: This prospective study was conducted in a 30-bed mixed ICU, from January 2015 through January 2017. Critically ill patients with invasive candidiasis were placed on initial empiric broad-spectrum antifungal agents either on echinocandins or liposomal amphoteric B. De-escalation to fungostatin strategy at day 3 vs. patients without de-escalation were compared. Clinical characteristics and the presence of clinical success by the eighth-day of treatment and 28-day outcome were evaluated. Clinical success was defined as the complete eradication of Candida spp. in blood cultures. Economic outcomes included budget impact was also evaluated. RESULTS: Forty-seven ICU patients with documented invasive candidemia enrolled and received empiric broad-spectrum antifungal agents with either echinocandins or liposomal amphotericin B. Of those, 22 (47%) were eligible for de-escalation at day 3 to fungostatin based on susceptibility test for fungi. Specific Candida species isolated in the de-escalation group were C. albicans (14, 64%), and non-C. albicans (8, 36%). Interestingly 6/22 (27%) invasive candidemia de-escalated cases relapsed by day 8 of initiation of the empiric therapy, vs. 2/25 (8%) of the control group (P = 0.12). Survival rates at day 28 were not statistically significant among the two groups [15/22 (68%) vs. 11/25 (44%), P = 0.12]. The budget impact of using de-escalation was greater, producing cost savings of €3,200 per patient but did not translate into significant clinical and mycological success. CONCLUSION: Critically ill patients who had received empiric antifungal therapy for documented candidemia and underwent de-escalation from echinocandins or liposomal ambisome B to fungostatin had a potential economic cost–benefit but did not associate with significantly improved clinical success rates. DISCLOSURES: All authors: No reported disclosures. Oxford University Press 2019-10-23 /pmc/articles/PMC6811146/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofz360.812 Text en © The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial reproduction and distribution of the work, in any medium, provided the original work is not altered or transformed in any way, and that the work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Abstracts
magira, Eleni
Kalogianni, Athanasia-Aikaterini
Zakynthinos, Spyros
744. Antifungal De-escalation Strategy in ICU Patients: Clinical Success and Cost Savings
title 744. Antifungal De-escalation Strategy in ICU Patients: Clinical Success and Cost Savings
title_full 744. Antifungal De-escalation Strategy in ICU Patients: Clinical Success and Cost Savings
title_fullStr 744. Antifungal De-escalation Strategy in ICU Patients: Clinical Success and Cost Savings
title_full_unstemmed 744. Antifungal De-escalation Strategy in ICU Patients: Clinical Success and Cost Savings
title_short 744. Antifungal De-escalation Strategy in ICU Patients: Clinical Success and Cost Savings
title_sort 744. antifungal de-escalation strategy in icu patients: clinical success and cost savings
topic Abstracts
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6811146/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofz360.812
work_keys_str_mv AT magiraeleni 744antifungaldeescalationstrategyinicupatientsclinicalsuccessandcostsavings
AT kalogianniathanasiaaikaterini 744antifungaldeescalationstrategyinicupatientsclinicalsuccessandcostsavings
AT zakynthinosspyros 744antifungaldeescalationstrategyinicupatientsclinicalsuccessandcostsavings