Cargando…

734. Modeling the Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of Intravenous and Oral Omadacycline with and without a Loading Dose

BACKGROUND: Omadacycline (OMC) is an intravenous (IV) and oral aminomethylcycline antibiotic in the tetracycline class approved in the United States to treat acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections (ABSSSI) and community-acquired bacterial pneumonia (CABP) in adults. The approved dosing r...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Friedrich, Lawrence, Curran, Marla, Chitra, Surya, Manley, Amy, Bai, Stephen, Noble, Bob, Steenbergen, Judith N, Garrity-Ryan, Lynne, Tzanis, Evan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6811165/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofz360.802
_version_ 1783462414524612608
author Friedrich, Lawrence
Curran, Marla
Chitra, Surya
Manley, Amy
Bai, Stephen
Noble, Bob
Steenbergen, Judith N
Garrity-Ryan, Lynne
Tzanis, Evan
author_facet Friedrich, Lawrence
Curran, Marla
Chitra, Surya
Manley, Amy
Bai, Stephen
Noble, Bob
Steenbergen, Judith N
Garrity-Ryan, Lynne
Tzanis, Evan
author_sort Friedrich, Lawrence
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Omadacycline (OMC) is an intravenous (IV) and oral aminomethylcycline antibiotic in the tetracycline class approved in the United States to treat acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections (ABSSSI) and community-acquired bacterial pneumonia (CABP) in adults. The approved dosing regimens of OMC include a loading dose designed to achieve steady-state exposures early in the course of therapy. We assessed the impact on OMC exposure and subsequent pharmacodynamics (PD) on Day 2 and at steady state (Day 5) in the situation where a loading dose may not be given. METHODS: Phase 1 pharmacokinetic (PK) data were used to determine OMC exposure on Day 2 and at steady state (Day 5) for the following: IV regimens 100 mg IV q12h on Day 1 then 100 mg IV QD (load), 100 mg IV QD (no load); and oral regimens 450 mg oral QD on Days 1 and 2 then 300 mg QD (load) and 300 mg oral QD (no load). AUCs on Day 2 and Day 5 for no-load regimens were compared with the regimens with loading doses. Additionally, AUC:MIC ratios were calculated using OMC MIC(90) for two main pathogens of interest in ABSSSI and CABP, respectively, Staphylococcus aureus (0.25 mg/L) and Streptococcus pneumoniae (0.12 mg/L). In vivo AUC:MIC targets for stasis and 1-log kill used were 21.9 and 57.7 (S. aureus) and 31.2 and 65.8 (S. pneumoniae). RESULTS: Day 2 and 5 AUCs are shown in the Figure. AUCs on Day 2 were lower for the two regimens without loading doses and were 72% (IV) and 73% (oral) of those with a loading dose. However, at steady state on Day 5, no-load regimen AUCs were essentially the same at 98% for both the IV and oral regimens. Despite lower AUCs on Day 2 for the no-load regimens, the AUC:MIC ratio would still be expected to exceed the stasis threshold for both pathogens and the 1-log kill threshold for S. pneumoniae (figure). This same pattern was also noted on Day 5. CONCLUSION: Exposure as assessed using AUC was lower early on in therapy on Day 2 for both IV and oral regimens. However, exposures were not different on Day 5 at steady state. Despite lower exposure on Day 2, OMC would still be expected to meet or exceed PK/PD thresholds associated with stasis for S. aureus and S. pneumoniae. The 1-log kill threshold was exceeded for S. pneumoniae. Further studies are needed to confirm any clinical impact of the omission of OMC loading doses. [Image: see text] DISCLOSURES: All authors: No reported disclosures.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6811165
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-68111652019-10-29 734. Modeling the Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of Intravenous and Oral Omadacycline with and without a Loading Dose Friedrich, Lawrence Curran, Marla Chitra, Surya Manley, Amy Bai, Stephen Noble, Bob Steenbergen, Judith N Garrity-Ryan, Lynne Tzanis, Evan Open Forum Infect Dis Abstracts BACKGROUND: Omadacycline (OMC) is an intravenous (IV) and oral aminomethylcycline antibiotic in the tetracycline class approved in the United States to treat acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections (ABSSSI) and community-acquired bacterial pneumonia (CABP) in adults. The approved dosing regimens of OMC include a loading dose designed to achieve steady-state exposures early in the course of therapy. We assessed the impact on OMC exposure and subsequent pharmacodynamics (PD) on Day 2 and at steady state (Day 5) in the situation where a loading dose may not be given. METHODS: Phase 1 pharmacokinetic (PK) data were used to determine OMC exposure on Day 2 and at steady state (Day 5) for the following: IV regimens 100 mg IV q12h on Day 1 then 100 mg IV QD (load), 100 mg IV QD (no load); and oral regimens 450 mg oral QD on Days 1 and 2 then 300 mg QD (load) and 300 mg oral QD (no load). AUCs on Day 2 and Day 5 for no-load regimens were compared with the regimens with loading doses. Additionally, AUC:MIC ratios were calculated using OMC MIC(90) for two main pathogens of interest in ABSSSI and CABP, respectively, Staphylococcus aureus (0.25 mg/L) and Streptococcus pneumoniae (0.12 mg/L). In vivo AUC:MIC targets for stasis and 1-log kill used were 21.9 and 57.7 (S. aureus) and 31.2 and 65.8 (S. pneumoniae). RESULTS: Day 2 and 5 AUCs are shown in the Figure. AUCs on Day 2 were lower for the two regimens without loading doses and were 72% (IV) and 73% (oral) of those with a loading dose. However, at steady state on Day 5, no-load regimen AUCs were essentially the same at 98% for both the IV and oral regimens. Despite lower AUCs on Day 2 for the no-load regimens, the AUC:MIC ratio would still be expected to exceed the stasis threshold for both pathogens and the 1-log kill threshold for S. pneumoniae (figure). This same pattern was also noted on Day 5. CONCLUSION: Exposure as assessed using AUC was lower early on in therapy on Day 2 for both IV and oral regimens. However, exposures were not different on Day 5 at steady state. Despite lower exposure on Day 2, OMC would still be expected to meet or exceed PK/PD thresholds associated with stasis for S. aureus and S. pneumoniae. The 1-log kill threshold was exceeded for S. pneumoniae. Further studies are needed to confirm any clinical impact of the omission of OMC loading doses. [Image: see text] DISCLOSURES: All authors: No reported disclosures. Oxford University Press 2019-10-23 /pmc/articles/PMC6811165/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofz360.802 Text en © The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial reproduction and distribution of the work, in any medium, provided the original work is not altered or transformed in any way, and that the work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Abstracts
Friedrich, Lawrence
Curran, Marla
Chitra, Surya
Manley, Amy
Bai, Stephen
Noble, Bob
Steenbergen, Judith N
Garrity-Ryan, Lynne
Tzanis, Evan
734. Modeling the Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of Intravenous and Oral Omadacycline with and without a Loading Dose
title 734. Modeling the Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of Intravenous and Oral Omadacycline with and without a Loading Dose
title_full 734. Modeling the Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of Intravenous and Oral Omadacycline with and without a Loading Dose
title_fullStr 734. Modeling the Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of Intravenous and Oral Omadacycline with and without a Loading Dose
title_full_unstemmed 734. Modeling the Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of Intravenous and Oral Omadacycline with and without a Loading Dose
title_short 734. Modeling the Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of Intravenous and Oral Omadacycline with and without a Loading Dose
title_sort 734. modeling the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of intravenous and oral omadacycline with and without a loading dose
topic Abstracts
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6811165/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofz360.802
work_keys_str_mv AT friedrichlawrence 734modelingthepharmacokineticsandpharmacodynamicsofintravenousandoralomadacyclinewithandwithoutaloadingdose
AT curranmarla 734modelingthepharmacokineticsandpharmacodynamicsofintravenousandoralomadacyclinewithandwithoutaloadingdose
AT chitrasurya 734modelingthepharmacokineticsandpharmacodynamicsofintravenousandoralomadacyclinewithandwithoutaloadingdose
AT manleyamy 734modelingthepharmacokineticsandpharmacodynamicsofintravenousandoralomadacyclinewithandwithoutaloadingdose
AT baistephen 734modelingthepharmacokineticsandpharmacodynamicsofintravenousandoralomadacyclinewithandwithoutaloadingdose
AT noblebob 734modelingthepharmacokineticsandpharmacodynamicsofintravenousandoralomadacyclinewithandwithoutaloadingdose
AT steenbergenjudithn 734modelingthepharmacokineticsandpharmacodynamicsofintravenousandoralomadacyclinewithandwithoutaloadingdose
AT garrityryanlynne 734modelingthepharmacokineticsandpharmacodynamicsofintravenousandoralomadacyclinewithandwithoutaloadingdose
AT tzanisevan 734modelingthepharmacokineticsandpharmacodynamicsofintravenousandoralomadacyclinewithandwithoutaloadingdose