Cargando…

2367. Selecting Testing Frequency for Estimation of Incubation Periods: A Simulation Study Based on Clostridioides difficile Observations

BACKGROUND: Estimates of the incubation period (time between pathogen transmission and symptom onset) for an infection inform infection control and prevention measures. However, observation of the exact transmission and onset times rarely occurs and “coarse,” or doubly interval-censored, data about...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wilson, Brigid, Ascha, Mustafa S, O’Hagan, Justin, Donskey, Curtis
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6811206/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofz360.2045
_version_ 1783462424989401088
author Wilson, Brigid
Ascha, Mustafa S
O’Hagan, Justin
Donskey, Curtis
author_facet Wilson, Brigid
Ascha, Mustafa S
O’Hagan, Justin
Donskey, Curtis
author_sort Wilson, Brigid
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Estimates of the incubation period (time between pathogen transmission and symptom onset) for an infection inform infection control and prevention measures. However, observation of the exact transmission and onset times rarely occurs and “coarse,” or doubly interval-censored, data about these exact times are typically used for estimation. The effect of coarseness on the required number of symptomatic cases and the uncertainty of the estimates is unknown, prompting a simulation study informed by data from an investigation of the incubation period of Clostridioides difficile. METHODS: We simulated incubation period data assuming a log-normal distribution, a true median incubation period of 7 days, and a standard deviation of 1 day for sample sizes of 50 to 300 symptomatic cases. For each sample size, we simulated 1000 datasets and examined the impact of testing frequencies, considering intervals between tests of 0.25 to 2 times the median incubation period (1.75 to 14 days) about both transmission and symptom onset times. With these doubly interval-censored observed values, we fit accelerated failure time models to estimate the median incubation time and its 95% confidence interval (CI). Comparing the coverage of the true median and the widths of the CIs, we summarized simulation results across sample sizes and testing frequencies. RESULTS: Model results from all combinations of sample sizes and testing frequencies yielded median incubation period CIs close to the target 95% coverage level (Figure 1). The width of the 95% CI about the median decreased with larger sample sizes and shorter times between tests (Figure 2). Thus, similar estimates and confidence intervals would be observed from 100 symptomatic cases with a testing frequency of 3.5 days as from 200 symptomatic cases tested every 14 days. CONCLUSION: The frequency of testing is a key factor in planning studies to estimate incubation periods for infectious diseases. To achieve a desired degree of certainty in estimation, increased frequency of testing can reduce the number of symptomatic cases required. We showed that simulations can assist in planning natural history studies, and these methods could be extended to include population data (e.g., transmission incidence) and cost constraints. [Image: see text] [Image: see text] DISCLOSURES: All authors: No reported disclosures.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6811206
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-68112062019-10-29 2367. Selecting Testing Frequency for Estimation of Incubation Periods: A Simulation Study Based on Clostridioides difficile Observations Wilson, Brigid Ascha, Mustafa S O’Hagan, Justin Donskey, Curtis Open Forum Infect Dis Abstracts BACKGROUND: Estimates of the incubation period (time between pathogen transmission and symptom onset) for an infection inform infection control and prevention measures. However, observation of the exact transmission and onset times rarely occurs and “coarse,” or doubly interval-censored, data about these exact times are typically used for estimation. The effect of coarseness on the required number of symptomatic cases and the uncertainty of the estimates is unknown, prompting a simulation study informed by data from an investigation of the incubation period of Clostridioides difficile. METHODS: We simulated incubation period data assuming a log-normal distribution, a true median incubation period of 7 days, and a standard deviation of 1 day for sample sizes of 50 to 300 symptomatic cases. For each sample size, we simulated 1000 datasets and examined the impact of testing frequencies, considering intervals between tests of 0.25 to 2 times the median incubation period (1.75 to 14 days) about both transmission and symptom onset times. With these doubly interval-censored observed values, we fit accelerated failure time models to estimate the median incubation time and its 95% confidence interval (CI). Comparing the coverage of the true median and the widths of the CIs, we summarized simulation results across sample sizes and testing frequencies. RESULTS: Model results from all combinations of sample sizes and testing frequencies yielded median incubation period CIs close to the target 95% coverage level (Figure 1). The width of the 95% CI about the median decreased with larger sample sizes and shorter times between tests (Figure 2). Thus, similar estimates and confidence intervals would be observed from 100 symptomatic cases with a testing frequency of 3.5 days as from 200 symptomatic cases tested every 14 days. CONCLUSION: The frequency of testing is a key factor in planning studies to estimate incubation periods for infectious diseases. To achieve a desired degree of certainty in estimation, increased frequency of testing can reduce the number of symptomatic cases required. We showed that simulations can assist in planning natural history studies, and these methods could be extended to include population data (e.g., transmission incidence) and cost constraints. [Image: see text] [Image: see text] DISCLOSURES: All authors: No reported disclosures. Oxford University Press 2019-10-23 /pmc/articles/PMC6811206/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofz360.2045 Text en © The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial reproduction and distribution of the work, in any medium, provided the original work is not altered or transformed in any way, and that the work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Abstracts
Wilson, Brigid
Ascha, Mustafa S
O’Hagan, Justin
Donskey, Curtis
2367. Selecting Testing Frequency for Estimation of Incubation Periods: A Simulation Study Based on Clostridioides difficile Observations
title 2367. Selecting Testing Frequency for Estimation of Incubation Periods: A Simulation Study Based on Clostridioides difficile Observations
title_full 2367. Selecting Testing Frequency for Estimation of Incubation Periods: A Simulation Study Based on Clostridioides difficile Observations
title_fullStr 2367. Selecting Testing Frequency for Estimation of Incubation Periods: A Simulation Study Based on Clostridioides difficile Observations
title_full_unstemmed 2367. Selecting Testing Frequency for Estimation of Incubation Periods: A Simulation Study Based on Clostridioides difficile Observations
title_short 2367. Selecting Testing Frequency for Estimation of Incubation Periods: A Simulation Study Based on Clostridioides difficile Observations
title_sort 2367. selecting testing frequency for estimation of incubation periods: a simulation study based on clostridioides difficile observations
topic Abstracts
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6811206/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofz360.2045
work_keys_str_mv AT wilsonbrigid 2367selectingtestingfrequencyforestimationofincubationperiodsasimulationstudybasedonclostridioidesdifficileobservations
AT aschamustafas 2367selectingtestingfrequencyforestimationofincubationperiodsasimulationstudybasedonclostridioidesdifficileobservations
AT ohaganjustin 2367selectingtestingfrequencyforestimationofincubationperiodsasimulationstudybasedonclostridioidesdifficileobservations
AT donskeycurtis 2367selectingtestingfrequencyforestimationofincubationperiodsasimulationstudybasedonclostridioidesdifficileobservations