Cargando…

572. Relationship Between Chlorhexidine Gluconate (CHG) Skin Concentrations and Microbial Skin Colonization among Medical Intensive Care Unit (MICU) Patients

BACKGROUND: CHG bathing is used to suppress patients’ microbial skin colonization, in order to prevent infections and transmission of multidrug-resistant organisms. Prior work has suggested that microbial growth is inhibited when CHG skin concentrations exceed threshold levels. METHODS: We conducted...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rhee, Yoona, Hayden, Mary K, Simms, Andrew T, Yelin, Rachel D, Lolans, Karen, Bell, Pamela B, Schoeny, Michael, Baker, Arthur W, Baker, Meghan A, Gohil, Shruti K, Rhee, Chanu, Talati, Naasha J, Warren, David K, Welbel, Sharon F, Dangana, Thelma E, Majalca, Thelma, Bravo, Heilen, Cass, Candice, Nelson, Alicia, Tolomeo, Pam C, Wolf, Robert, Lin, Michael Y
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6811213/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofz360.641
_version_ 1783462426724794368
author Rhee, Yoona
Hayden, Mary K
Simms, Andrew T
Yelin, Rachel D
Lolans, Karen
Bell, Pamela B
Schoeny, Michael
Baker, Arthur W
Baker, Meghan A
Gohil, Shruti K
Rhee, Chanu
Talati, Naasha J
Warren, David K
Welbel, Sharon F
Dangana, Thelma E
Majalca, Thelma
Bravo, Heilen
Cass, Candice
Nelson, Alicia
Tolomeo, Pam C
Wolf, Robert
Lin, Michael Y
author_facet Rhee, Yoona
Hayden, Mary K
Simms, Andrew T
Yelin, Rachel D
Lolans, Karen
Bell, Pamela B
Schoeny, Michael
Baker, Arthur W
Baker, Meghan A
Gohil, Shruti K
Rhee, Chanu
Talati, Naasha J
Warren, David K
Welbel, Sharon F
Dangana, Thelma E
Majalca, Thelma
Bravo, Heilen
Cass, Candice
Nelson, Alicia
Tolomeo, Pam C
Wolf, Robert
Lin, Michael Y
author_sort Rhee, Yoona
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: CHG bathing is used to suppress patients’ microbial skin colonization, in order to prevent infections and transmission of multidrug-resistant organisms. Prior work has suggested that microbial growth is inhibited when CHG skin concentrations exceed threshold levels. METHODS: We conducted 6 single-day surveys from January 2018 to February 2019 in 7 academic hospital MICUs with established CHG patient bathing. Adult patients were eligible to have skin swabbed from adjacent 25 cm2 areas on the neck, axilla, and inguinal region for culture and CHG concentration determination. CHG skin concentrations were measured by a semi-quantitative colorimetric assay. Selective media were used to isolate targeted microorganisms (Table 1). Species were confirmed by matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry; antibiotic susceptibility was determined by MicroScan (Beckman Coulter). We modeled the relationship between CHG skin concentrations (log2-transformed) and microorganism recovery (yes/no as primary outcome) using multilevel models controlling for clustering of body sites within patients and within ICUs, assessing slope and threshold effects. RESULTS: We enrolled 736/759 (97%) patients and sampled 2176 skin sites. Gram-positive bacteria were detected most frequently (Table 1). The adjusted odds of identifying gram-positive organisms decreased linearly as CHG skin levels increased (Figure 1a), without evidence of a threshold effect. We also found significant negative linear slopes without evidence of threshold effects for other pathogens tested (Table 2; Figure 1), with the exception of gram-negative bacteria and vancomycin-resistant enterococci. When modeling quantitative culture results (colony-forming units) for gram-positive organisms as a continuous outcome variable, a similar relationship was found. CONCLUSION: Higher concentrations of CHG were associated with less frequent recovery of gram-positive bacteria and Candida species on the skin of MICU patients who were bathed routinely with CHG. For microbial inhibition, we did not identify a threshold concentration of CHG on the skin; rather, increasing CHG skin concentrations led to additional gains in inhibition. For infection prevention, aiming for high CHG skin levels may be beneficial. [Image: see text] [Image: see text] [Image: see text] DISCLOSURES: All authors: No reported disclosures.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6811213
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-68112132019-10-29 572. Relationship Between Chlorhexidine Gluconate (CHG) Skin Concentrations and Microbial Skin Colonization among Medical Intensive Care Unit (MICU) Patients Rhee, Yoona Hayden, Mary K Simms, Andrew T Yelin, Rachel D Lolans, Karen Bell, Pamela B Schoeny, Michael Baker, Arthur W Baker, Meghan A Gohil, Shruti K Rhee, Chanu Talati, Naasha J Warren, David K Welbel, Sharon F Dangana, Thelma E Majalca, Thelma Bravo, Heilen Cass, Candice Nelson, Alicia Tolomeo, Pam C Wolf, Robert Lin, Michael Y Open Forum Infect Dis Abstracts BACKGROUND: CHG bathing is used to suppress patients’ microbial skin colonization, in order to prevent infections and transmission of multidrug-resistant organisms. Prior work has suggested that microbial growth is inhibited when CHG skin concentrations exceed threshold levels. METHODS: We conducted 6 single-day surveys from January 2018 to February 2019 in 7 academic hospital MICUs with established CHG patient bathing. Adult patients were eligible to have skin swabbed from adjacent 25 cm2 areas on the neck, axilla, and inguinal region for culture and CHG concentration determination. CHG skin concentrations were measured by a semi-quantitative colorimetric assay. Selective media were used to isolate targeted microorganisms (Table 1). Species were confirmed by matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry; antibiotic susceptibility was determined by MicroScan (Beckman Coulter). We modeled the relationship between CHG skin concentrations (log2-transformed) and microorganism recovery (yes/no as primary outcome) using multilevel models controlling for clustering of body sites within patients and within ICUs, assessing slope and threshold effects. RESULTS: We enrolled 736/759 (97%) patients and sampled 2176 skin sites. Gram-positive bacteria were detected most frequently (Table 1). The adjusted odds of identifying gram-positive organisms decreased linearly as CHG skin levels increased (Figure 1a), without evidence of a threshold effect. We also found significant negative linear slopes without evidence of threshold effects for other pathogens tested (Table 2; Figure 1), with the exception of gram-negative bacteria and vancomycin-resistant enterococci. When modeling quantitative culture results (colony-forming units) for gram-positive organisms as a continuous outcome variable, a similar relationship was found. CONCLUSION: Higher concentrations of CHG were associated with less frequent recovery of gram-positive bacteria and Candida species on the skin of MICU patients who were bathed routinely with CHG. For microbial inhibition, we did not identify a threshold concentration of CHG on the skin; rather, increasing CHG skin concentrations led to additional gains in inhibition. For infection prevention, aiming for high CHG skin levels may be beneficial. [Image: see text] [Image: see text] [Image: see text] DISCLOSURES: All authors: No reported disclosures. Oxford University Press 2019-10-23 /pmc/articles/PMC6811213/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofz360.641 Text en © The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial reproduction and distribution of the work, in any medium, provided the original work is not altered or transformed in any way, and that the work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Abstracts
Rhee, Yoona
Hayden, Mary K
Simms, Andrew T
Yelin, Rachel D
Lolans, Karen
Bell, Pamela B
Schoeny, Michael
Baker, Arthur W
Baker, Meghan A
Gohil, Shruti K
Rhee, Chanu
Talati, Naasha J
Warren, David K
Welbel, Sharon F
Dangana, Thelma E
Majalca, Thelma
Bravo, Heilen
Cass, Candice
Nelson, Alicia
Tolomeo, Pam C
Wolf, Robert
Lin, Michael Y
572. Relationship Between Chlorhexidine Gluconate (CHG) Skin Concentrations and Microbial Skin Colonization among Medical Intensive Care Unit (MICU) Patients
title 572. Relationship Between Chlorhexidine Gluconate (CHG) Skin Concentrations and Microbial Skin Colonization among Medical Intensive Care Unit (MICU) Patients
title_full 572. Relationship Between Chlorhexidine Gluconate (CHG) Skin Concentrations and Microbial Skin Colonization among Medical Intensive Care Unit (MICU) Patients
title_fullStr 572. Relationship Between Chlorhexidine Gluconate (CHG) Skin Concentrations and Microbial Skin Colonization among Medical Intensive Care Unit (MICU) Patients
title_full_unstemmed 572. Relationship Between Chlorhexidine Gluconate (CHG) Skin Concentrations and Microbial Skin Colonization among Medical Intensive Care Unit (MICU) Patients
title_short 572. Relationship Between Chlorhexidine Gluconate (CHG) Skin Concentrations and Microbial Skin Colonization among Medical Intensive Care Unit (MICU) Patients
title_sort 572. relationship between chlorhexidine gluconate (chg) skin concentrations and microbial skin colonization among medical intensive care unit (micu) patients
topic Abstracts
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6811213/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofz360.641
work_keys_str_mv AT rheeyoona 572relationshipbetweenchlorhexidinegluconatechgskinconcentrationsandmicrobialskincolonizationamongmedicalintensivecareunitmicupatients
AT haydenmaryk 572relationshipbetweenchlorhexidinegluconatechgskinconcentrationsandmicrobialskincolonizationamongmedicalintensivecareunitmicupatients
AT simmsandrewt 572relationshipbetweenchlorhexidinegluconatechgskinconcentrationsandmicrobialskincolonizationamongmedicalintensivecareunitmicupatients
AT yelinracheld 572relationshipbetweenchlorhexidinegluconatechgskinconcentrationsandmicrobialskincolonizationamongmedicalintensivecareunitmicupatients
AT lolanskaren 572relationshipbetweenchlorhexidinegluconatechgskinconcentrationsandmicrobialskincolonizationamongmedicalintensivecareunitmicupatients
AT bellpamelab 572relationshipbetweenchlorhexidinegluconatechgskinconcentrationsandmicrobialskincolonizationamongmedicalintensivecareunitmicupatients
AT schoenymichael 572relationshipbetweenchlorhexidinegluconatechgskinconcentrationsandmicrobialskincolonizationamongmedicalintensivecareunitmicupatients
AT bakerarthurw 572relationshipbetweenchlorhexidinegluconatechgskinconcentrationsandmicrobialskincolonizationamongmedicalintensivecareunitmicupatients
AT bakermeghana 572relationshipbetweenchlorhexidinegluconatechgskinconcentrationsandmicrobialskincolonizationamongmedicalintensivecareunitmicupatients
AT gohilshrutik 572relationshipbetweenchlorhexidinegluconatechgskinconcentrationsandmicrobialskincolonizationamongmedicalintensivecareunitmicupatients
AT rheechanu 572relationshipbetweenchlorhexidinegluconatechgskinconcentrationsandmicrobialskincolonizationamongmedicalintensivecareunitmicupatients
AT talatinaashaj 572relationshipbetweenchlorhexidinegluconatechgskinconcentrationsandmicrobialskincolonizationamongmedicalintensivecareunitmicupatients
AT warrendavidk 572relationshipbetweenchlorhexidinegluconatechgskinconcentrationsandmicrobialskincolonizationamongmedicalintensivecareunitmicupatients
AT welbelsharonf 572relationshipbetweenchlorhexidinegluconatechgskinconcentrationsandmicrobialskincolonizationamongmedicalintensivecareunitmicupatients
AT danganathelmae 572relationshipbetweenchlorhexidinegluconatechgskinconcentrationsandmicrobialskincolonizationamongmedicalintensivecareunitmicupatients
AT majalcathelma 572relationshipbetweenchlorhexidinegluconatechgskinconcentrationsandmicrobialskincolonizationamongmedicalintensivecareunitmicupatients
AT bravoheilen 572relationshipbetweenchlorhexidinegluconatechgskinconcentrationsandmicrobialskincolonizationamongmedicalintensivecareunitmicupatients
AT casscandice 572relationshipbetweenchlorhexidinegluconatechgskinconcentrationsandmicrobialskincolonizationamongmedicalintensivecareunitmicupatients
AT nelsonalicia 572relationshipbetweenchlorhexidinegluconatechgskinconcentrationsandmicrobialskincolonizationamongmedicalintensivecareunitmicupatients
AT tolomeopamc 572relationshipbetweenchlorhexidinegluconatechgskinconcentrationsandmicrobialskincolonizationamongmedicalintensivecareunitmicupatients
AT wolfrobert 572relationshipbetweenchlorhexidinegluconatechgskinconcentrationsandmicrobialskincolonizationamongmedicalintensivecareunitmicupatients
AT linmichaely 572relationshipbetweenchlorhexidinegluconatechgskinconcentrationsandmicrobialskincolonizationamongmedicalintensivecareunitmicupatients