Cargando…
1066. Antimicrobial Stewardship Program: Audit and Feedback for Continued Improvement
BACKGROUND: Audit and feedback is a foundational approach used by antimicrobial stewardship programs (ASP) and has been our primary method for ASP intervention for over 7 years. We sought to evaluate and improve our ASP methods as well as identify barriers to effective antimicrobial management. METH...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6811221/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofz360.930 |
_version_ | 1783462428730720256 |
---|---|
author | Wang, Joseph Alexander, Bryan Bergman, Scott Ma, Jihyun Stohs, Erica J Van Schooneveld, Trevor C Marcelin, Jasmine R Marcelin, Jasmine R |
author_facet | Wang, Joseph Alexander, Bryan Bergman, Scott Ma, Jihyun Stohs, Erica J Van Schooneveld, Trevor C Marcelin, Jasmine R Marcelin, Jasmine R |
author_sort | Wang, Joseph |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Audit and feedback is a foundational approach used by antimicrobial stewardship programs (ASP) and has been our primary method for ASP intervention for over 7 years. We sought to evaluate and improve our ASP methods as well as identify barriers to effective antimicrobial management. METHODS: We distributed an online survey at our institution, to clinicians (prescribers and pharmacists). Results compared their perceptions of the ASP and barriers to antimicrobial stewardship. Descriptive statistics include counts and percentages for categorical variables. Fisher’s exact test was performed to describe the comparison groups for each survey response. We reviewed survey comments and categorized according to themes. RESULTS: We distributed the survey to 459 clinicians over 4 months with 110 surveys completed for a response rate of 24%. Prescribers comprised 77.3% of respondents. 74.5% of clinicians reported that antibiotic overuse is a problem at our institution. Prescribers were more likely to agree that conflicting priorities to core measures was a barrier to stewardship as well as disagree with current guidelines (P < 0.05) compared with pharmacists. Figure 1 demonstrates other barriers. Prescribers found ASP more helpful than pharmacists in antimicrobial dose adjustments (P < 0.05). Figure 2 demonstrates other scenarios where ASP provided input with varying degrees of perceived helpfulness. Pharmacists used the ASP website more than prescribers (P < 0.05). Text message and phone call were preferred methods of contact with prescribers favoring messages and pharmacists favoring phone calls. Clinicians infrequently used order-sets; Figure 3 demonstrates reasons for lack of use. 17.2% of participants commented about the ASP; of these, 42% were positive and 32% contained suggestions to improve communication and education. Comments are summarized in Figure 4. CONCLUSION: Overall, clinicians agree that antimicrobial overuse is a concern at our institution. ASP is generally well received; however, after 7 years of operation, this survey shows that continued improvement is needed, notably in communication, education, and EMR order-sets. Results will be used to refine methods of effective communication and information delivery to nurture an effective relationship. [Image: see text] [Image: see text] [Image: see text] [Image: see text] DISCLOSURES: All authors: No reported disclosures. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6811221 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-68112212019-10-29 1066. Antimicrobial Stewardship Program: Audit and Feedback for Continued Improvement Wang, Joseph Alexander, Bryan Bergman, Scott Ma, Jihyun Stohs, Erica J Van Schooneveld, Trevor C Marcelin, Jasmine R Marcelin, Jasmine R Open Forum Infect Dis Abstracts BACKGROUND: Audit and feedback is a foundational approach used by antimicrobial stewardship programs (ASP) and has been our primary method for ASP intervention for over 7 years. We sought to evaluate and improve our ASP methods as well as identify barriers to effective antimicrobial management. METHODS: We distributed an online survey at our institution, to clinicians (prescribers and pharmacists). Results compared their perceptions of the ASP and barriers to antimicrobial stewardship. Descriptive statistics include counts and percentages for categorical variables. Fisher’s exact test was performed to describe the comparison groups for each survey response. We reviewed survey comments and categorized according to themes. RESULTS: We distributed the survey to 459 clinicians over 4 months with 110 surveys completed for a response rate of 24%. Prescribers comprised 77.3% of respondents. 74.5% of clinicians reported that antibiotic overuse is a problem at our institution. Prescribers were more likely to agree that conflicting priorities to core measures was a barrier to stewardship as well as disagree with current guidelines (P < 0.05) compared with pharmacists. Figure 1 demonstrates other barriers. Prescribers found ASP more helpful than pharmacists in antimicrobial dose adjustments (P < 0.05). Figure 2 demonstrates other scenarios where ASP provided input with varying degrees of perceived helpfulness. Pharmacists used the ASP website more than prescribers (P < 0.05). Text message and phone call were preferred methods of contact with prescribers favoring messages and pharmacists favoring phone calls. Clinicians infrequently used order-sets; Figure 3 demonstrates reasons for lack of use. 17.2% of participants commented about the ASP; of these, 42% were positive and 32% contained suggestions to improve communication and education. Comments are summarized in Figure 4. CONCLUSION: Overall, clinicians agree that antimicrobial overuse is a concern at our institution. ASP is generally well received; however, after 7 years of operation, this survey shows that continued improvement is needed, notably in communication, education, and EMR order-sets. Results will be used to refine methods of effective communication and information delivery to nurture an effective relationship. [Image: see text] [Image: see text] [Image: see text] [Image: see text] DISCLOSURES: All authors: No reported disclosures. Oxford University Press 2019-10-23 /pmc/articles/PMC6811221/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofz360.930 Text en © The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial reproduction and distribution of the work, in any medium, provided the original work is not altered or transformed in any way, and that the work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com |
spellingShingle | Abstracts Wang, Joseph Alexander, Bryan Bergman, Scott Ma, Jihyun Stohs, Erica J Van Schooneveld, Trevor C Marcelin, Jasmine R Marcelin, Jasmine R 1066. Antimicrobial Stewardship Program: Audit and Feedback for Continued Improvement |
title | 1066. Antimicrobial Stewardship Program: Audit and Feedback for Continued Improvement |
title_full | 1066. Antimicrobial Stewardship Program: Audit and Feedback for Continued Improvement |
title_fullStr | 1066. Antimicrobial Stewardship Program: Audit and Feedback for Continued Improvement |
title_full_unstemmed | 1066. Antimicrobial Stewardship Program: Audit and Feedback for Continued Improvement |
title_short | 1066. Antimicrobial Stewardship Program: Audit and Feedback for Continued Improvement |
title_sort | 1066. antimicrobial stewardship program: audit and feedback for continued improvement |
topic | Abstracts |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6811221/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofz360.930 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT wangjoseph 1066antimicrobialstewardshipprogramauditandfeedbackforcontinuedimprovement AT alexanderbryan 1066antimicrobialstewardshipprogramauditandfeedbackforcontinuedimprovement AT bergmanscott 1066antimicrobialstewardshipprogramauditandfeedbackforcontinuedimprovement AT majihyun 1066antimicrobialstewardshipprogramauditandfeedbackforcontinuedimprovement AT stohsericaj 1066antimicrobialstewardshipprogramauditandfeedbackforcontinuedimprovement AT vanschooneveldtrevorc 1066antimicrobialstewardshipprogramauditandfeedbackforcontinuedimprovement AT marcelinjasminer 1066antimicrobialstewardshipprogramauditandfeedbackforcontinuedimprovement AT marcelinjasminer 1066antimicrobialstewardshipprogramauditandfeedbackforcontinuedimprovement |