Cargando…
644. Comparative Evaluation of ETEST® ERV bioMérieux with the CLSI Broth Microdilution Method for Eravacycline MIC Determination
BACKGROUND: Eravacycline (XERAVA™) is a novel, FDA and EMA-approved fully-synthetic fluorocycline antibiotic developed by Tetraphase Pharmaceuticals Inc. for the treatment of complicated intra-abdominal infections (cIAI) including those caused by multidrug-resistant (MDR) pathogens that have been hi...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6811247/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofz360.712 |
_version_ | 1783462435460481024 |
---|---|
author | Sauvonnet, Veronique Fyfe, Corey Halimi, Diane Martelin, Roland Zambardi, Gilles |
author_facet | Sauvonnet, Veronique Fyfe, Corey Halimi, Diane Martelin, Roland Zambardi, Gilles |
author_sort | Sauvonnet, Veronique |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Eravacycline (XERAVA™) is a novel, FDA and EMA-approved fully-synthetic fluorocycline antibiotic developed by Tetraphase Pharmaceuticals Inc. for the treatment of complicated intra-abdominal infections (cIAI) including those caused by multidrug-resistant (MDR) pathogens that have been highlighted as urgent public health threats by the US CDC and the WHO. The new ETEST ERV strip (MIC range 0.002 – 32 µg/mL) has been developed by bioMérieux and calibrated vs. the broth microdilution reference method (BMD) as described by the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) to determine the minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) of eravacycline against Enterobacterales and Enterococci. The aim of the study was to compare ETEST ERV to the CLSI BMD method on a panel of 166 strains comprising 131 Enterobacterales and 35 Enterococci. METHODS: Quality control was performed with the CLSI QC strains E.coli ATCC 25922 and E.faecalis ATCC 29212. The ETEST ERV strip was applied on a Mueller–Hinton agar plate previously seeded with a 0.5 McF bacterial suspension. After incubation for 16–20H at 35°C, the reading was performed using the bacteriostatic mode i.e.,80% of growth. The FDA-approved breakpoints were applied (S≤0.5µg/mL for Enterobacterales and S ≤0.064 µg/mL for Enterococci). RESULTS: The MIC essential agreement was 99.4% at ±1 dilution for the whole panel and the category agreement was 96.4% with 4.8% Major Errors (1 E. coli, 2 K. pneumoniae, 1 K.aerogenes, 1 C. koseri, 1 E. faecalis), all at ±1 dilution around the single breakpoint. No Very Major Error (VME) was observed. CONCLUSION: In this study, the new ETEST ERV strip has been found to be substantially equivalent to the CLI reference method. MIC end-points appear easier to read in comparison to the reference method. With a 15-dilution MIC range and simplicity of use, ETEST ERV could represent a valuable tool for MIC determination and an alternative to the BMD reference method. ETEST ERV will undergo clinical studies to seek IVD FDA clearance and CE marking. For Research Use Only. The performance characteristics of this product have not yet been established. DISCLOSURES: All authors: No reported disclosures. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6811247 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-68112472019-10-29 644. Comparative Evaluation of ETEST® ERV bioMérieux with the CLSI Broth Microdilution Method for Eravacycline MIC Determination Sauvonnet, Veronique Fyfe, Corey Halimi, Diane Martelin, Roland Zambardi, Gilles Open Forum Infect Dis Abstracts BACKGROUND: Eravacycline (XERAVA™) is a novel, FDA and EMA-approved fully-synthetic fluorocycline antibiotic developed by Tetraphase Pharmaceuticals Inc. for the treatment of complicated intra-abdominal infections (cIAI) including those caused by multidrug-resistant (MDR) pathogens that have been highlighted as urgent public health threats by the US CDC and the WHO. The new ETEST ERV strip (MIC range 0.002 – 32 µg/mL) has been developed by bioMérieux and calibrated vs. the broth microdilution reference method (BMD) as described by the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) to determine the minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) of eravacycline against Enterobacterales and Enterococci. The aim of the study was to compare ETEST ERV to the CLSI BMD method on a panel of 166 strains comprising 131 Enterobacterales and 35 Enterococci. METHODS: Quality control was performed with the CLSI QC strains E.coli ATCC 25922 and E.faecalis ATCC 29212. The ETEST ERV strip was applied on a Mueller–Hinton agar plate previously seeded with a 0.5 McF bacterial suspension. After incubation for 16–20H at 35°C, the reading was performed using the bacteriostatic mode i.e.,80% of growth. The FDA-approved breakpoints were applied (S≤0.5µg/mL for Enterobacterales and S ≤0.064 µg/mL for Enterococci). RESULTS: The MIC essential agreement was 99.4% at ±1 dilution for the whole panel and the category agreement was 96.4% with 4.8% Major Errors (1 E. coli, 2 K. pneumoniae, 1 K.aerogenes, 1 C. koseri, 1 E. faecalis), all at ±1 dilution around the single breakpoint. No Very Major Error (VME) was observed. CONCLUSION: In this study, the new ETEST ERV strip has been found to be substantially equivalent to the CLI reference method. MIC end-points appear easier to read in comparison to the reference method. With a 15-dilution MIC range and simplicity of use, ETEST ERV could represent a valuable tool for MIC determination and an alternative to the BMD reference method. ETEST ERV will undergo clinical studies to seek IVD FDA clearance and CE marking. For Research Use Only. The performance characteristics of this product have not yet been established. DISCLOSURES: All authors: No reported disclosures. Oxford University Press 2019-10-23 /pmc/articles/PMC6811247/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofz360.712 Text en © The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial reproduction and distribution of the work, in any medium, provided the original work is not altered or transformed in any way, and that the work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com |
spellingShingle | Abstracts Sauvonnet, Veronique Fyfe, Corey Halimi, Diane Martelin, Roland Zambardi, Gilles 644. Comparative Evaluation of ETEST® ERV bioMérieux with the CLSI Broth Microdilution Method for Eravacycline MIC Determination |
title | 644. Comparative Evaluation of ETEST® ERV bioMérieux with the CLSI Broth Microdilution Method for Eravacycline MIC Determination |
title_full | 644. Comparative Evaluation of ETEST® ERV bioMérieux with the CLSI Broth Microdilution Method for Eravacycline MIC Determination |
title_fullStr | 644. Comparative Evaluation of ETEST® ERV bioMérieux with the CLSI Broth Microdilution Method for Eravacycline MIC Determination |
title_full_unstemmed | 644. Comparative Evaluation of ETEST® ERV bioMérieux with the CLSI Broth Microdilution Method for Eravacycline MIC Determination |
title_short | 644. Comparative Evaluation of ETEST® ERV bioMérieux with the CLSI Broth Microdilution Method for Eravacycline MIC Determination |
title_sort | 644. comparative evaluation of etest® erv biomérieux with the clsi broth microdilution method for eravacycline mic determination |
topic | Abstracts |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6811247/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofz360.712 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT sauvonnetveronique 644comparativeevaluationofetestervbiomerieuxwiththeclsibrothmicrodilutionmethodforeravacyclinemicdetermination AT fyfecorey 644comparativeevaluationofetestervbiomerieuxwiththeclsibrothmicrodilutionmethodforeravacyclinemicdetermination AT halimidiane 644comparativeevaluationofetestervbiomerieuxwiththeclsibrothmicrodilutionmethodforeravacyclinemicdetermination AT martelinroland 644comparativeevaluationofetestervbiomerieuxwiththeclsibrothmicrodilutionmethodforeravacyclinemicdetermination AT zambardigilles 644comparativeevaluationofetestervbiomerieuxwiththeclsibrothmicrodilutionmethodforeravacyclinemicdetermination |