Cargando…

644. Comparative Evaluation of ETEST® ERV bioMérieux with the CLSI Broth Microdilution Method for Eravacycline MIC Determination

BACKGROUND: Eravacycline (XERAVA™) is a novel, FDA and EMA-approved fully-synthetic fluorocycline antibiotic developed by Tetraphase Pharmaceuticals Inc. for the treatment of complicated intra-abdominal infections (cIAI) including those caused by multidrug-resistant (MDR) pathogens that have been hi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sauvonnet, Veronique, Fyfe, Corey, Halimi, Diane, Martelin, Roland, Zambardi, Gilles
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6811247/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofz360.712
_version_ 1783462435460481024
author Sauvonnet, Veronique
Fyfe, Corey
Halimi, Diane
Martelin, Roland
Zambardi, Gilles
author_facet Sauvonnet, Veronique
Fyfe, Corey
Halimi, Diane
Martelin, Roland
Zambardi, Gilles
author_sort Sauvonnet, Veronique
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Eravacycline (XERAVA™) is a novel, FDA and EMA-approved fully-synthetic fluorocycline antibiotic developed by Tetraphase Pharmaceuticals Inc. for the treatment of complicated intra-abdominal infections (cIAI) including those caused by multidrug-resistant (MDR) pathogens that have been highlighted as urgent public health threats by the US CDC and the WHO. The new ETEST ERV strip (MIC range 0.002 – 32 µg/mL) has been developed by bioMérieux and calibrated vs. the broth microdilution reference method (BMD) as described by the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) to determine the minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) of eravacycline against Enterobacterales and Enterococci. The aim of the study was to compare ETEST ERV to the CLSI BMD method on a panel of 166 strains comprising 131 Enterobacterales and 35 Enterococci. METHODS: Quality control was performed with the CLSI QC strains E.coli ATCC 25922 and E.faecalis ATCC 29212. The ETEST ERV strip was applied on a Mueller–Hinton agar plate previously seeded with a 0.5 McF bacterial suspension. After incubation for 16–20H at 35°C, the reading was performed using the bacteriostatic mode i.e.,80% of growth. The FDA-approved breakpoints were applied (S≤0.5µg/mL for Enterobacterales and S ≤0.064 µg/mL for Enterococci). RESULTS: The MIC essential agreement was 99.4% at ±1 dilution for the whole panel and the category agreement was 96.4% with 4.8% Major Errors (1 E. coli, 2 K. pneumoniae, 1 K.aerogenes, 1 C. koseri, 1 E. faecalis), all at ±1 dilution around the single breakpoint. No Very Major Error (VME) was observed. CONCLUSION: In this study, the new ETEST ERV strip has been found to be substantially equivalent to the CLI reference method. MIC end-points appear easier to read in comparison to the reference method. With a 15-dilution MIC range and simplicity of use, ETEST ERV could represent a valuable tool for MIC determination and an alternative to the BMD reference method. ETEST ERV will undergo clinical studies to seek IVD FDA clearance and CE marking. For Research Use Only. The performance characteristics of this product have not yet been established. DISCLOSURES: All authors: No reported disclosures.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6811247
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-68112472019-10-29 644. Comparative Evaluation of ETEST® ERV bioMérieux with the CLSI Broth Microdilution Method for Eravacycline MIC Determination Sauvonnet, Veronique Fyfe, Corey Halimi, Diane Martelin, Roland Zambardi, Gilles Open Forum Infect Dis Abstracts BACKGROUND: Eravacycline (XERAVA™) is a novel, FDA and EMA-approved fully-synthetic fluorocycline antibiotic developed by Tetraphase Pharmaceuticals Inc. for the treatment of complicated intra-abdominal infections (cIAI) including those caused by multidrug-resistant (MDR) pathogens that have been highlighted as urgent public health threats by the US CDC and the WHO. The new ETEST ERV strip (MIC range 0.002 – 32 µg/mL) has been developed by bioMérieux and calibrated vs. the broth microdilution reference method (BMD) as described by the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) to determine the minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) of eravacycline against Enterobacterales and Enterococci. The aim of the study was to compare ETEST ERV to the CLSI BMD method on a panel of 166 strains comprising 131 Enterobacterales and 35 Enterococci. METHODS: Quality control was performed with the CLSI QC strains E.coli ATCC 25922 and E.faecalis ATCC 29212. The ETEST ERV strip was applied on a Mueller–Hinton agar plate previously seeded with a 0.5 McF bacterial suspension. After incubation for 16–20H at 35°C, the reading was performed using the bacteriostatic mode i.e.,80% of growth. The FDA-approved breakpoints were applied (S≤0.5µg/mL for Enterobacterales and S ≤0.064 µg/mL for Enterococci). RESULTS: The MIC essential agreement was 99.4% at ±1 dilution for the whole panel and the category agreement was 96.4% with 4.8% Major Errors (1 E. coli, 2 K. pneumoniae, 1 K.aerogenes, 1 C. koseri, 1 E. faecalis), all at ±1 dilution around the single breakpoint. No Very Major Error (VME) was observed. CONCLUSION: In this study, the new ETEST ERV strip has been found to be substantially equivalent to the CLI reference method. MIC end-points appear easier to read in comparison to the reference method. With a 15-dilution MIC range and simplicity of use, ETEST ERV could represent a valuable tool for MIC determination and an alternative to the BMD reference method. ETEST ERV will undergo clinical studies to seek IVD FDA clearance and CE marking. For Research Use Only. The performance characteristics of this product have not yet been established. DISCLOSURES: All authors: No reported disclosures. Oxford University Press 2019-10-23 /pmc/articles/PMC6811247/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofz360.712 Text en © The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial reproduction and distribution of the work, in any medium, provided the original work is not altered or transformed in any way, and that the work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Abstracts
Sauvonnet, Veronique
Fyfe, Corey
Halimi, Diane
Martelin, Roland
Zambardi, Gilles
644. Comparative Evaluation of ETEST® ERV bioMérieux with the CLSI Broth Microdilution Method for Eravacycline MIC Determination
title 644. Comparative Evaluation of ETEST® ERV bioMérieux with the CLSI Broth Microdilution Method for Eravacycline MIC Determination
title_full 644. Comparative Evaluation of ETEST® ERV bioMérieux with the CLSI Broth Microdilution Method for Eravacycline MIC Determination
title_fullStr 644. Comparative Evaluation of ETEST® ERV bioMérieux with the CLSI Broth Microdilution Method for Eravacycline MIC Determination
title_full_unstemmed 644. Comparative Evaluation of ETEST® ERV bioMérieux with the CLSI Broth Microdilution Method for Eravacycline MIC Determination
title_short 644. Comparative Evaluation of ETEST® ERV bioMérieux with the CLSI Broth Microdilution Method for Eravacycline MIC Determination
title_sort 644. comparative evaluation of etest® erv biomérieux with the clsi broth microdilution method for eravacycline mic determination
topic Abstracts
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6811247/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofz360.712
work_keys_str_mv AT sauvonnetveronique 644comparativeevaluationofetestervbiomerieuxwiththeclsibrothmicrodilutionmethodforeravacyclinemicdetermination
AT fyfecorey 644comparativeevaluationofetestervbiomerieuxwiththeclsibrothmicrodilutionmethodforeravacyclinemicdetermination
AT halimidiane 644comparativeevaluationofetestervbiomerieuxwiththeclsibrothmicrodilutionmethodforeravacyclinemicdetermination
AT martelinroland 644comparativeevaluationofetestervbiomerieuxwiththeclsibrothmicrodilutionmethodforeravacyclinemicdetermination
AT zambardigilles 644comparativeevaluationofetestervbiomerieuxwiththeclsibrothmicrodilutionmethodforeravacyclinemicdetermination