Cargando…

766. Telehealth Practices, Barriers, and Future Interest among Pediatric Infectious Disease Clinicians in the United States: Results from the 2019 Pediatric Infectious Diseases Society (PIDS) Telehealth Working Group Survey

BACKGROUND: There is a paucity of access to pediatric infectious diseases (PID) physicians in the United States. To improve access, PID clinicians spend significant time providing nonreimbursed curbside consultations (CCs) to community providers. While there is increasing utilization of telehealth t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Olson, Daniel, Hakim, Amin, Gaviria-Agudelo, Claudia, Sabella, Camille, Fanella, Sergio, Arun, Aparna, Russo, Michael E, Kronman, Matthew, Adler-Shohet, Felice, Holzmann-Pazgal, Galit, Sanderson, Susan, Phillips, Terri Christene, Edwards, Kathryn, Siddiqui, Javeed, Bryant, Kristina
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6811249/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofz360.834
_version_ 1783462436077043712
author Olson, Daniel
Hakim, Amin
Gaviria-Agudelo, Claudia
Sabella, Camille
Fanella, Sergio
Arun, Aparna
Russo, Michael E
Kronman, Matthew
Adler-Shohet, Felice
Holzmann-Pazgal, Galit
Sanderson, Susan
Phillips, Terri Christene
Edwards, Kathryn
Siddiqui, Javeed
Bryant, Kristina
author_facet Olson, Daniel
Hakim, Amin
Gaviria-Agudelo, Claudia
Sabella, Camille
Fanella, Sergio
Arun, Aparna
Russo, Michael E
Kronman, Matthew
Adler-Shohet, Felice
Holzmann-Pazgal, Galit
Sanderson, Susan
Phillips, Terri Christene
Edwards, Kathryn
Siddiqui, Javeed
Bryant, Kristina
author_sort Olson, Daniel
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: There is a paucity of access to pediatric infectious diseases (PID) physicians in the United States. To improve access, PID clinicians spend significant time providing nonreimbursed curbside consultations (CCs) to community providers. While there is increasing utilization of telehealth technologies to increase access to PID physicians, there is limited knowledge regarding adoption of these technologies and how they may be used to improve care and reimbursement. METHODS: The PIDS Telehealth Working Group developed a 33-question online survey to collect individual- and practice-level data on the burden of CCs, current telehealth practices and barriers, and interest in providing future telehealth services. It was emailed to the PIDS Listserv (n = 1,213) in April 2019. RESULTS: A total of 161 (13%) providers completed the survey (100% MD/DO), representing 37 states; most are university- (n = 100, 62%) and/or hospital- (n = 74, 46%) employed. Respondents’ practices provide a mean of 1–10 CCs/week to outside institutions (median 3–5 hours/week), with a median of 6–10% resulting in referrals. Outside nonreimbursed CCs are performed by phone/paging systems (n = 156, 98%), secure email (n = 66, 42%), text messaging (n = 46, 29%), and EMR-messaging (n = 38, 24%); they include a variety of services (Figure 1). Only 46 (29%) of individual respondents provide any type of reimbursed telehealth at their practices (Figure 2). Reimbursement mechanisms include fee-for-service (31%), Medicaid/Medicare (25%), private insurance (24%), and internal institutional (i.e., internal RVU) payments (16%). The majority of respondents were unaware of credentialing (n = 90, 64%) and liability coverage needs for telehealth (n = 68, 47%). Though most respondents (n = 81, 57%) were not satisfied with their current telehealth program and barriers were significant (Figure 3), the majority (n = 144, 95%) were interested in implementing a variety of reimbursable telehealth services and modalities (Figure 4). CONCLUSION: PID survey respondents indicated a lack of knowledge on key aspects of telehealth and perceive significant barriers to implementing telehealth at their institutions. Nonetheless, there is a strong interest in participating in a variety of telehealth services to increase access to care, with appropriate institutional support. [Image: see text] [Image: see text] [Image: see text] [Image: see text] DISCLOSURES: All authors: No reported disclosures.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6811249
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-68112492019-10-29 766. Telehealth Practices, Barriers, and Future Interest among Pediatric Infectious Disease Clinicians in the United States: Results from the 2019 Pediatric Infectious Diseases Society (PIDS) Telehealth Working Group Survey Olson, Daniel Hakim, Amin Gaviria-Agudelo, Claudia Sabella, Camille Fanella, Sergio Arun, Aparna Russo, Michael E Kronman, Matthew Adler-Shohet, Felice Holzmann-Pazgal, Galit Sanderson, Susan Phillips, Terri Christene Edwards, Kathryn Siddiqui, Javeed Bryant, Kristina Open Forum Infect Dis Abstracts BACKGROUND: There is a paucity of access to pediatric infectious diseases (PID) physicians in the United States. To improve access, PID clinicians spend significant time providing nonreimbursed curbside consultations (CCs) to community providers. While there is increasing utilization of telehealth technologies to increase access to PID physicians, there is limited knowledge regarding adoption of these technologies and how they may be used to improve care and reimbursement. METHODS: The PIDS Telehealth Working Group developed a 33-question online survey to collect individual- and practice-level data on the burden of CCs, current telehealth practices and barriers, and interest in providing future telehealth services. It was emailed to the PIDS Listserv (n = 1,213) in April 2019. RESULTS: A total of 161 (13%) providers completed the survey (100% MD/DO), representing 37 states; most are university- (n = 100, 62%) and/or hospital- (n = 74, 46%) employed. Respondents’ practices provide a mean of 1–10 CCs/week to outside institutions (median 3–5 hours/week), with a median of 6–10% resulting in referrals. Outside nonreimbursed CCs are performed by phone/paging systems (n = 156, 98%), secure email (n = 66, 42%), text messaging (n = 46, 29%), and EMR-messaging (n = 38, 24%); they include a variety of services (Figure 1). Only 46 (29%) of individual respondents provide any type of reimbursed telehealth at their practices (Figure 2). Reimbursement mechanisms include fee-for-service (31%), Medicaid/Medicare (25%), private insurance (24%), and internal institutional (i.e., internal RVU) payments (16%). The majority of respondents were unaware of credentialing (n = 90, 64%) and liability coverage needs for telehealth (n = 68, 47%). Though most respondents (n = 81, 57%) were not satisfied with their current telehealth program and barriers were significant (Figure 3), the majority (n = 144, 95%) were interested in implementing a variety of reimbursable telehealth services and modalities (Figure 4). CONCLUSION: PID survey respondents indicated a lack of knowledge on key aspects of telehealth and perceive significant barriers to implementing telehealth at their institutions. Nonetheless, there is a strong interest in participating in a variety of telehealth services to increase access to care, with appropriate institutional support. [Image: see text] [Image: see text] [Image: see text] [Image: see text] DISCLOSURES: All authors: No reported disclosures. Oxford University Press 2019-10-23 /pmc/articles/PMC6811249/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofz360.834 Text en © The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial reproduction and distribution of the work, in any medium, provided the original work is not altered or transformed in any way, and that the work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Abstracts
Olson, Daniel
Hakim, Amin
Gaviria-Agudelo, Claudia
Sabella, Camille
Fanella, Sergio
Arun, Aparna
Russo, Michael E
Kronman, Matthew
Adler-Shohet, Felice
Holzmann-Pazgal, Galit
Sanderson, Susan
Phillips, Terri Christene
Edwards, Kathryn
Siddiqui, Javeed
Bryant, Kristina
766. Telehealth Practices, Barriers, and Future Interest among Pediatric Infectious Disease Clinicians in the United States: Results from the 2019 Pediatric Infectious Diseases Society (PIDS) Telehealth Working Group Survey
title 766. Telehealth Practices, Barriers, and Future Interest among Pediatric Infectious Disease Clinicians in the United States: Results from the 2019 Pediatric Infectious Diseases Society (PIDS) Telehealth Working Group Survey
title_full 766. Telehealth Practices, Barriers, and Future Interest among Pediatric Infectious Disease Clinicians in the United States: Results from the 2019 Pediatric Infectious Diseases Society (PIDS) Telehealth Working Group Survey
title_fullStr 766. Telehealth Practices, Barriers, and Future Interest among Pediatric Infectious Disease Clinicians in the United States: Results from the 2019 Pediatric Infectious Diseases Society (PIDS) Telehealth Working Group Survey
title_full_unstemmed 766. Telehealth Practices, Barriers, and Future Interest among Pediatric Infectious Disease Clinicians in the United States: Results from the 2019 Pediatric Infectious Diseases Society (PIDS) Telehealth Working Group Survey
title_short 766. Telehealth Practices, Barriers, and Future Interest among Pediatric Infectious Disease Clinicians in the United States: Results from the 2019 Pediatric Infectious Diseases Society (PIDS) Telehealth Working Group Survey
title_sort 766. telehealth practices, barriers, and future interest among pediatric infectious disease clinicians in the united states: results from the 2019 pediatric infectious diseases society (pids) telehealth working group survey
topic Abstracts
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6811249/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofz360.834
work_keys_str_mv AT olsondaniel 766telehealthpracticesbarriersandfutureinterestamongpediatricinfectiousdiseasecliniciansintheunitedstatesresultsfromthe2019pediatricinfectiousdiseasessocietypidstelehealthworkinggroupsurvey
AT hakimamin 766telehealthpracticesbarriersandfutureinterestamongpediatricinfectiousdiseasecliniciansintheunitedstatesresultsfromthe2019pediatricinfectiousdiseasessocietypidstelehealthworkinggroupsurvey
AT gaviriaagudeloclaudia 766telehealthpracticesbarriersandfutureinterestamongpediatricinfectiousdiseasecliniciansintheunitedstatesresultsfromthe2019pediatricinfectiousdiseasessocietypidstelehealthworkinggroupsurvey
AT sabellacamille 766telehealthpracticesbarriersandfutureinterestamongpediatricinfectiousdiseasecliniciansintheunitedstatesresultsfromthe2019pediatricinfectiousdiseasessocietypidstelehealthworkinggroupsurvey
AT fanellasergio 766telehealthpracticesbarriersandfutureinterestamongpediatricinfectiousdiseasecliniciansintheunitedstatesresultsfromthe2019pediatricinfectiousdiseasessocietypidstelehealthworkinggroupsurvey
AT arunaparna 766telehealthpracticesbarriersandfutureinterestamongpediatricinfectiousdiseasecliniciansintheunitedstatesresultsfromthe2019pediatricinfectiousdiseasessocietypidstelehealthworkinggroupsurvey
AT russomichaele 766telehealthpracticesbarriersandfutureinterestamongpediatricinfectiousdiseasecliniciansintheunitedstatesresultsfromthe2019pediatricinfectiousdiseasessocietypidstelehealthworkinggroupsurvey
AT kronmanmatthew 766telehealthpracticesbarriersandfutureinterestamongpediatricinfectiousdiseasecliniciansintheunitedstatesresultsfromthe2019pediatricinfectiousdiseasessocietypidstelehealthworkinggroupsurvey
AT adlershohetfelice 766telehealthpracticesbarriersandfutureinterestamongpediatricinfectiousdiseasecliniciansintheunitedstatesresultsfromthe2019pediatricinfectiousdiseasessocietypidstelehealthworkinggroupsurvey
AT holzmannpazgalgalit 766telehealthpracticesbarriersandfutureinterestamongpediatricinfectiousdiseasecliniciansintheunitedstatesresultsfromthe2019pediatricinfectiousdiseasessocietypidstelehealthworkinggroupsurvey
AT sandersonsusan 766telehealthpracticesbarriersandfutureinterestamongpediatricinfectiousdiseasecliniciansintheunitedstatesresultsfromthe2019pediatricinfectiousdiseasessocietypidstelehealthworkinggroupsurvey
AT phillipsterrichristene 766telehealthpracticesbarriersandfutureinterestamongpediatricinfectiousdiseasecliniciansintheunitedstatesresultsfromthe2019pediatricinfectiousdiseasessocietypidstelehealthworkinggroupsurvey
AT edwardskathryn 766telehealthpracticesbarriersandfutureinterestamongpediatricinfectiousdiseasecliniciansintheunitedstatesresultsfromthe2019pediatricinfectiousdiseasessocietypidstelehealthworkinggroupsurvey
AT siddiquijaveed 766telehealthpracticesbarriersandfutureinterestamongpediatricinfectiousdiseasecliniciansintheunitedstatesresultsfromthe2019pediatricinfectiousdiseasessocietypidstelehealthworkinggroupsurvey
AT bryantkristina 766telehealthpracticesbarriersandfutureinterestamongpediatricinfectiousdiseasecliniciansintheunitedstatesresultsfromthe2019pediatricinfectiousdiseasessocietypidstelehealthworkinggroupsurvey