Cargando…
766. Telehealth Practices, Barriers, and Future Interest among Pediatric Infectious Disease Clinicians in the United States: Results from the 2019 Pediatric Infectious Diseases Society (PIDS) Telehealth Working Group Survey
BACKGROUND: There is a paucity of access to pediatric infectious diseases (PID) physicians in the United States. To improve access, PID clinicians spend significant time providing nonreimbursed curbside consultations (CCs) to community providers. While there is increasing utilization of telehealth t...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6811249/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofz360.834 |
_version_ | 1783462436077043712 |
---|---|
author | Olson, Daniel Hakim, Amin Gaviria-Agudelo, Claudia Sabella, Camille Fanella, Sergio Arun, Aparna Russo, Michael E Kronman, Matthew Adler-Shohet, Felice Holzmann-Pazgal, Galit Sanderson, Susan Phillips, Terri Christene Edwards, Kathryn Siddiqui, Javeed Bryant, Kristina |
author_facet | Olson, Daniel Hakim, Amin Gaviria-Agudelo, Claudia Sabella, Camille Fanella, Sergio Arun, Aparna Russo, Michael E Kronman, Matthew Adler-Shohet, Felice Holzmann-Pazgal, Galit Sanderson, Susan Phillips, Terri Christene Edwards, Kathryn Siddiqui, Javeed Bryant, Kristina |
author_sort | Olson, Daniel |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: There is a paucity of access to pediatric infectious diseases (PID) physicians in the United States. To improve access, PID clinicians spend significant time providing nonreimbursed curbside consultations (CCs) to community providers. While there is increasing utilization of telehealth technologies to increase access to PID physicians, there is limited knowledge regarding adoption of these technologies and how they may be used to improve care and reimbursement. METHODS: The PIDS Telehealth Working Group developed a 33-question online survey to collect individual- and practice-level data on the burden of CCs, current telehealth practices and barriers, and interest in providing future telehealth services. It was emailed to the PIDS Listserv (n = 1,213) in April 2019. RESULTS: A total of 161 (13%) providers completed the survey (100% MD/DO), representing 37 states; most are university- (n = 100, 62%) and/or hospital- (n = 74, 46%) employed. Respondents’ practices provide a mean of 1–10 CCs/week to outside institutions (median 3–5 hours/week), with a median of 6–10% resulting in referrals. Outside nonreimbursed CCs are performed by phone/paging systems (n = 156, 98%), secure email (n = 66, 42%), text messaging (n = 46, 29%), and EMR-messaging (n = 38, 24%); they include a variety of services (Figure 1). Only 46 (29%) of individual respondents provide any type of reimbursed telehealth at their practices (Figure 2). Reimbursement mechanisms include fee-for-service (31%), Medicaid/Medicare (25%), private insurance (24%), and internal institutional (i.e., internal RVU) payments (16%). The majority of respondents were unaware of credentialing (n = 90, 64%) and liability coverage needs for telehealth (n = 68, 47%). Though most respondents (n = 81, 57%) were not satisfied with their current telehealth program and barriers were significant (Figure 3), the majority (n = 144, 95%) were interested in implementing a variety of reimbursable telehealth services and modalities (Figure 4). CONCLUSION: PID survey respondents indicated a lack of knowledge on key aspects of telehealth and perceive significant barriers to implementing telehealth at their institutions. Nonetheless, there is a strong interest in participating in a variety of telehealth services to increase access to care, with appropriate institutional support. [Image: see text] [Image: see text] [Image: see text] [Image: see text] DISCLOSURES: All authors: No reported disclosures. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6811249 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-68112492019-10-29 766. Telehealth Practices, Barriers, and Future Interest among Pediatric Infectious Disease Clinicians in the United States: Results from the 2019 Pediatric Infectious Diseases Society (PIDS) Telehealth Working Group Survey Olson, Daniel Hakim, Amin Gaviria-Agudelo, Claudia Sabella, Camille Fanella, Sergio Arun, Aparna Russo, Michael E Kronman, Matthew Adler-Shohet, Felice Holzmann-Pazgal, Galit Sanderson, Susan Phillips, Terri Christene Edwards, Kathryn Siddiqui, Javeed Bryant, Kristina Open Forum Infect Dis Abstracts BACKGROUND: There is a paucity of access to pediatric infectious diseases (PID) physicians in the United States. To improve access, PID clinicians spend significant time providing nonreimbursed curbside consultations (CCs) to community providers. While there is increasing utilization of telehealth technologies to increase access to PID physicians, there is limited knowledge regarding adoption of these technologies and how they may be used to improve care and reimbursement. METHODS: The PIDS Telehealth Working Group developed a 33-question online survey to collect individual- and practice-level data on the burden of CCs, current telehealth practices and barriers, and interest in providing future telehealth services. It was emailed to the PIDS Listserv (n = 1,213) in April 2019. RESULTS: A total of 161 (13%) providers completed the survey (100% MD/DO), representing 37 states; most are university- (n = 100, 62%) and/or hospital- (n = 74, 46%) employed. Respondents’ practices provide a mean of 1–10 CCs/week to outside institutions (median 3–5 hours/week), with a median of 6–10% resulting in referrals. Outside nonreimbursed CCs are performed by phone/paging systems (n = 156, 98%), secure email (n = 66, 42%), text messaging (n = 46, 29%), and EMR-messaging (n = 38, 24%); they include a variety of services (Figure 1). Only 46 (29%) of individual respondents provide any type of reimbursed telehealth at their practices (Figure 2). Reimbursement mechanisms include fee-for-service (31%), Medicaid/Medicare (25%), private insurance (24%), and internal institutional (i.e., internal RVU) payments (16%). The majority of respondents were unaware of credentialing (n = 90, 64%) and liability coverage needs for telehealth (n = 68, 47%). Though most respondents (n = 81, 57%) were not satisfied with their current telehealth program and barriers were significant (Figure 3), the majority (n = 144, 95%) were interested in implementing a variety of reimbursable telehealth services and modalities (Figure 4). CONCLUSION: PID survey respondents indicated a lack of knowledge on key aspects of telehealth and perceive significant barriers to implementing telehealth at their institutions. Nonetheless, there is a strong interest in participating in a variety of telehealth services to increase access to care, with appropriate institutional support. [Image: see text] [Image: see text] [Image: see text] [Image: see text] DISCLOSURES: All authors: No reported disclosures. Oxford University Press 2019-10-23 /pmc/articles/PMC6811249/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofz360.834 Text en © The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial reproduction and distribution of the work, in any medium, provided the original work is not altered or transformed in any way, and that the work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com |
spellingShingle | Abstracts Olson, Daniel Hakim, Amin Gaviria-Agudelo, Claudia Sabella, Camille Fanella, Sergio Arun, Aparna Russo, Michael E Kronman, Matthew Adler-Shohet, Felice Holzmann-Pazgal, Galit Sanderson, Susan Phillips, Terri Christene Edwards, Kathryn Siddiqui, Javeed Bryant, Kristina 766. Telehealth Practices, Barriers, and Future Interest among Pediatric Infectious Disease Clinicians in the United States: Results from the 2019 Pediatric Infectious Diseases Society (PIDS) Telehealth Working Group Survey |
title | 766. Telehealth Practices, Barriers, and Future Interest among Pediatric Infectious Disease Clinicians in the United States: Results from the 2019 Pediatric Infectious Diseases Society (PIDS) Telehealth Working Group Survey |
title_full | 766. Telehealth Practices, Barriers, and Future Interest among Pediatric Infectious Disease Clinicians in the United States: Results from the 2019 Pediatric Infectious Diseases Society (PIDS) Telehealth Working Group Survey |
title_fullStr | 766. Telehealth Practices, Barriers, and Future Interest among Pediatric Infectious Disease Clinicians in the United States: Results from the 2019 Pediatric Infectious Diseases Society (PIDS) Telehealth Working Group Survey |
title_full_unstemmed | 766. Telehealth Practices, Barriers, and Future Interest among Pediatric Infectious Disease Clinicians in the United States: Results from the 2019 Pediatric Infectious Diseases Society (PIDS) Telehealth Working Group Survey |
title_short | 766. Telehealth Practices, Barriers, and Future Interest among Pediatric Infectious Disease Clinicians in the United States: Results from the 2019 Pediatric Infectious Diseases Society (PIDS) Telehealth Working Group Survey |
title_sort | 766. telehealth practices, barriers, and future interest among pediatric infectious disease clinicians in the united states: results from the 2019 pediatric infectious diseases society (pids) telehealth working group survey |
topic | Abstracts |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6811249/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofz360.834 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT olsondaniel 766telehealthpracticesbarriersandfutureinterestamongpediatricinfectiousdiseasecliniciansintheunitedstatesresultsfromthe2019pediatricinfectiousdiseasessocietypidstelehealthworkinggroupsurvey AT hakimamin 766telehealthpracticesbarriersandfutureinterestamongpediatricinfectiousdiseasecliniciansintheunitedstatesresultsfromthe2019pediatricinfectiousdiseasessocietypidstelehealthworkinggroupsurvey AT gaviriaagudeloclaudia 766telehealthpracticesbarriersandfutureinterestamongpediatricinfectiousdiseasecliniciansintheunitedstatesresultsfromthe2019pediatricinfectiousdiseasessocietypidstelehealthworkinggroupsurvey AT sabellacamille 766telehealthpracticesbarriersandfutureinterestamongpediatricinfectiousdiseasecliniciansintheunitedstatesresultsfromthe2019pediatricinfectiousdiseasessocietypidstelehealthworkinggroupsurvey AT fanellasergio 766telehealthpracticesbarriersandfutureinterestamongpediatricinfectiousdiseasecliniciansintheunitedstatesresultsfromthe2019pediatricinfectiousdiseasessocietypidstelehealthworkinggroupsurvey AT arunaparna 766telehealthpracticesbarriersandfutureinterestamongpediatricinfectiousdiseasecliniciansintheunitedstatesresultsfromthe2019pediatricinfectiousdiseasessocietypidstelehealthworkinggroupsurvey AT russomichaele 766telehealthpracticesbarriersandfutureinterestamongpediatricinfectiousdiseasecliniciansintheunitedstatesresultsfromthe2019pediatricinfectiousdiseasessocietypidstelehealthworkinggroupsurvey AT kronmanmatthew 766telehealthpracticesbarriersandfutureinterestamongpediatricinfectiousdiseasecliniciansintheunitedstatesresultsfromthe2019pediatricinfectiousdiseasessocietypidstelehealthworkinggroupsurvey AT adlershohetfelice 766telehealthpracticesbarriersandfutureinterestamongpediatricinfectiousdiseasecliniciansintheunitedstatesresultsfromthe2019pediatricinfectiousdiseasessocietypidstelehealthworkinggroupsurvey AT holzmannpazgalgalit 766telehealthpracticesbarriersandfutureinterestamongpediatricinfectiousdiseasecliniciansintheunitedstatesresultsfromthe2019pediatricinfectiousdiseasessocietypidstelehealthworkinggroupsurvey AT sandersonsusan 766telehealthpracticesbarriersandfutureinterestamongpediatricinfectiousdiseasecliniciansintheunitedstatesresultsfromthe2019pediatricinfectiousdiseasessocietypidstelehealthworkinggroupsurvey AT phillipsterrichristene 766telehealthpracticesbarriersandfutureinterestamongpediatricinfectiousdiseasecliniciansintheunitedstatesresultsfromthe2019pediatricinfectiousdiseasessocietypidstelehealthworkinggroupsurvey AT edwardskathryn 766telehealthpracticesbarriersandfutureinterestamongpediatricinfectiousdiseasecliniciansintheunitedstatesresultsfromthe2019pediatricinfectiousdiseasessocietypidstelehealthworkinggroupsurvey AT siddiquijaveed 766telehealthpracticesbarriersandfutureinterestamongpediatricinfectiousdiseasecliniciansintheunitedstatesresultsfromthe2019pediatricinfectiousdiseasessocietypidstelehealthworkinggroupsurvey AT bryantkristina 766telehealthpracticesbarriersandfutureinterestamongpediatricinfectiousdiseasecliniciansintheunitedstatesresultsfromthe2019pediatricinfectiousdiseasessocietypidstelehealthworkinggroupsurvey |