Cargando…

1049. Using Alternative Alerts in the Electronic Health Record to Guide Antimicrobial Selection Decisionmaking at the Point of Order Entry

BACKGROUND: In a White Paper published in 2019, SHEA describes “The role of electronic health record and ‘add-on’ clinical decision support systems to enhance antimicrobial stewardship programs.” Modifications of the electronic health record and add-on clinical decision support systems are compared...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Ebert, Steven C
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6811284/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofz360.913
_version_ 1783462444611403776
author Ebert, Steven C
author_facet Ebert, Steven C
author_sort Ebert, Steven C
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: In a White Paper published in 2019, SHEA describes “The role of electronic health record and ‘add-on’ clinical decision support systems to enhance antimicrobial stewardship programs.” Modifications of the electronic health record and add-on clinical decision support systems are compared and contrasted. Some disadvantages of modification of the EHR include the need to include all end-user affiliates in modifications, lack of order set utilization, and heavy demands of IT staff to modify the EHR. We have utilized alternative alerts which may be customized to individual affiliates and are relatively easy to build which fire when specific medications are ordered (whether within order sets or not) and guide clinicians to more appropriate antibiotic choices. METHODS: From an antimicrobial stewardship perspective, alternative alerts are activated during the ordering of antibiotics for which routine use is discouraged (e.g., carbapenems, fluoroquinolones). When a provider enters an order, the alternative alert will pop up. The alert consists of two sections: an alert section describing the reason for the alert and a list of therapeutic options for the targeted drug; and links to orders for alternative antibiotics/combinations. The alerts may be configured to allow or not allow the orderer to continue with the original order. Different alternative alerts can be created and used at different facilities using the same EHR platform. We designed alternative alerts for fluoroquinolones, carbapenems, and fifth-generation cephalosporins that allowed providers to continue with the original order. We tested their impact on antimicrobial prescribing for 18 months after implementation, measured as quarterly days of therapy (DOT)/1000 pt-days. RESULTS: We noted marked reductions in quarterly DOT/1000 pt-days for fluoroquinolones (-70%) and fifth-generation cephalosporins (-90%). The impact on carbapenem prescribing was more variable. CONCLUSION: Alternative alerts represent an easily created, customizable means to guide providers’ antimicrobial selections. We plan to incorporate more alternative alerts into our antimicrobial ordering process and strengthen the alert for carbapenems. [Image: see text] DISCLOSURES: All authors: No reported disclosures.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6811284
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-68112842019-10-29 1049. Using Alternative Alerts in the Electronic Health Record to Guide Antimicrobial Selection Decisionmaking at the Point of Order Entry Ebert, Steven C Open Forum Infect Dis Abstracts BACKGROUND: In a White Paper published in 2019, SHEA describes “The role of electronic health record and ‘add-on’ clinical decision support systems to enhance antimicrobial stewardship programs.” Modifications of the electronic health record and add-on clinical decision support systems are compared and contrasted. Some disadvantages of modification of the EHR include the need to include all end-user affiliates in modifications, lack of order set utilization, and heavy demands of IT staff to modify the EHR. We have utilized alternative alerts which may be customized to individual affiliates and are relatively easy to build which fire when specific medications are ordered (whether within order sets or not) and guide clinicians to more appropriate antibiotic choices. METHODS: From an antimicrobial stewardship perspective, alternative alerts are activated during the ordering of antibiotics for which routine use is discouraged (e.g., carbapenems, fluoroquinolones). When a provider enters an order, the alternative alert will pop up. The alert consists of two sections: an alert section describing the reason for the alert and a list of therapeutic options for the targeted drug; and links to orders for alternative antibiotics/combinations. The alerts may be configured to allow or not allow the orderer to continue with the original order. Different alternative alerts can be created and used at different facilities using the same EHR platform. We designed alternative alerts for fluoroquinolones, carbapenems, and fifth-generation cephalosporins that allowed providers to continue with the original order. We tested their impact on antimicrobial prescribing for 18 months after implementation, measured as quarterly days of therapy (DOT)/1000 pt-days. RESULTS: We noted marked reductions in quarterly DOT/1000 pt-days for fluoroquinolones (-70%) and fifth-generation cephalosporins (-90%). The impact on carbapenem prescribing was more variable. CONCLUSION: Alternative alerts represent an easily created, customizable means to guide providers’ antimicrobial selections. We plan to incorporate more alternative alerts into our antimicrobial ordering process and strengthen the alert for carbapenems. [Image: see text] DISCLOSURES: All authors: No reported disclosures. Oxford University Press 2019-10-23 /pmc/articles/PMC6811284/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofz360.913 Text en © The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial reproduction and distribution of the work, in any medium, provided the original work is not altered or transformed in any way, and that the work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Abstracts
Ebert, Steven C
1049. Using Alternative Alerts in the Electronic Health Record to Guide Antimicrobial Selection Decisionmaking at the Point of Order Entry
title 1049. Using Alternative Alerts in the Electronic Health Record to Guide Antimicrobial Selection Decisionmaking at the Point of Order Entry
title_full 1049. Using Alternative Alerts in the Electronic Health Record to Guide Antimicrobial Selection Decisionmaking at the Point of Order Entry
title_fullStr 1049. Using Alternative Alerts in the Electronic Health Record to Guide Antimicrobial Selection Decisionmaking at the Point of Order Entry
title_full_unstemmed 1049. Using Alternative Alerts in the Electronic Health Record to Guide Antimicrobial Selection Decisionmaking at the Point of Order Entry
title_short 1049. Using Alternative Alerts in the Electronic Health Record to Guide Antimicrobial Selection Decisionmaking at the Point of Order Entry
title_sort 1049. using alternative alerts in the electronic health record to guide antimicrobial selection decisionmaking at the point of order entry
topic Abstracts
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6811284/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofz360.913
work_keys_str_mv AT ebertstevenc 1049usingalternativealertsintheelectronichealthrecordtoguideantimicrobialselectiondecisionmakingatthepointoforderentry