Cargando…

1006. Do Antibiotic Choices Made in the ED Influence Inpatient Therapy?

BACKGROUND: Inappropriate antibiotic use (AU) is common among inpatients and may begin in the emergency department (ED). ED clinicians often make the first antibiotic decisions in patient care, but it is unknown whether or not these decisions influence inpatient AU. Understanding prescribing practic...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jones, Travis M, Dodds Ashley, Elizabeth, Johnson, Melissa D, Moehring, Rebekah W, Sarubbi, Christina, Wrenn, Rebekah
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6811290/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofz360.870
_version_ 1783462446316388352
author Jones, Travis M
Dodds Ashley, Elizabeth
Johnson, Melissa D
Moehring, Rebekah W
Sarubbi, Christina
Wrenn, Rebekah
author_facet Jones, Travis M
Dodds Ashley, Elizabeth
Johnson, Melissa D
Moehring, Rebekah W
Sarubbi, Christina
Wrenn, Rebekah
author_sort Jones, Travis M
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Inappropriate antibiotic use (AU) is common among inpatients and may begin in the emergency department (ED). ED clinicians often make the first antibiotic decisions in patient care, but it is unknown whether or not these decisions influence inpatient AU. Understanding prescribing practices at transitions of care is critical for implementing effective stewardship initiatives. METHODS: We performed a retrospective cohort study of AU in patients admitted to Duke University Hospital through the ED between July and December 2018. Included encounters had a minimum 2-day length of stay and received an antibiotic in both the ED and inpatient setting. Individual encounter IDs were used to link ED and inpatient AU reports generated from the DASON Antimicrobial Stewardship Assessment Portal. We compared the last ED administration date/time to the first inpatient unit administration for each agent. An antibiotic started in the ED was considered continued upon admission if the first inpatient administration occurred within 30 hours following the last ED administration. Demographic, clinical indication on order entry, length of therapy, and prescriber data were also collected. RESULTS: We included 3,336 encounters and 2,940 unique patients in the analysis. The median (IQR) patient age was 60 (42–72) years, and the most common indications for AU in the ED were sepsis (23.1%), pneumonia (17.8%), ABSSSI (15.5%), and intra-abdominal infection (12.8%). At least one antibiotic initiated in the ED was continued upon admission within 30 hours in 2,495 (74.8%) encounters. The most common antibiotics continued upon admission were piperacillin/tazobactam (32.8%), vancomycin (24.9%), and ceftriaxone (13.7%). The most common indications for agents continued upon admission were pneumonia (18%), intra-abdominal infection (15%), and ABSSSI (15%). Two or more antibiotics were continued upon admission in 916 (27.4%) encounters. CONCLUSION: In our retrospective review of ED antibiotic encounters resulting in admission for at least 2 days, three out of four encounters had at least one antibiotic continued upon admission. This finding highlights the importance of initial appropriate antibiotic selection and suggests stewardship interventions should target EDs as well as inpatient prescribing. DISCLOSURES: All authors: No reported disclosures.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6811290
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-68112902019-10-29 1006. Do Antibiotic Choices Made in the ED Influence Inpatient Therapy? Jones, Travis M Dodds Ashley, Elizabeth Johnson, Melissa D Moehring, Rebekah W Sarubbi, Christina Wrenn, Rebekah Open Forum Infect Dis Abstracts BACKGROUND: Inappropriate antibiotic use (AU) is common among inpatients and may begin in the emergency department (ED). ED clinicians often make the first antibiotic decisions in patient care, but it is unknown whether or not these decisions influence inpatient AU. Understanding prescribing practices at transitions of care is critical for implementing effective stewardship initiatives. METHODS: We performed a retrospective cohort study of AU in patients admitted to Duke University Hospital through the ED between July and December 2018. Included encounters had a minimum 2-day length of stay and received an antibiotic in both the ED and inpatient setting. Individual encounter IDs were used to link ED and inpatient AU reports generated from the DASON Antimicrobial Stewardship Assessment Portal. We compared the last ED administration date/time to the first inpatient unit administration for each agent. An antibiotic started in the ED was considered continued upon admission if the first inpatient administration occurred within 30 hours following the last ED administration. Demographic, clinical indication on order entry, length of therapy, and prescriber data were also collected. RESULTS: We included 3,336 encounters and 2,940 unique patients in the analysis. The median (IQR) patient age was 60 (42–72) years, and the most common indications for AU in the ED were sepsis (23.1%), pneumonia (17.8%), ABSSSI (15.5%), and intra-abdominal infection (12.8%). At least one antibiotic initiated in the ED was continued upon admission within 30 hours in 2,495 (74.8%) encounters. The most common antibiotics continued upon admission were piperacillin/tazobactam (32.8%), vancomycin (24.9%), and ceftriaxone (13.7%). The most common indications for agents continued upon admission were pneumonia (18%), intra-abdominal infection (15%), and ABSSSI (15%). Two or more antibiotics were continued upon admission in 916 (27.4%) encounters. CONCLUSION: In our retrospective review of ED antibiotic encounters resulting in admission for at least 2 days, three out of four encounters had at least one antibiotic continued upon admission. This finding highlights the importance of initial appropriate antibiotic selection and suggests stewardship interventions should target EDs as well as inpatient prescribing. DISCLOSURES: All authors: No reported disclosures. Oxford University Press 2019-10-23 /pmc/articles/PMC6811290/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofz360.870 Text en © The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial reproduction and distribution of the work, in any medium, provided the original work is not altered or transformed in any way, and that the work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Abstracts
Jones, Travis M
Dodds Ashley, Elizabeth
Johnson, Melissa D
Moehring, Rebekah W
Sarubbi, Christina
Wrenn, Rebekah
1006. Do Antibiotic Choices Made in the ED Influence Inpatient Therapy?
title 1006. Do Antibiotic Choices Made in the ED Influence Inpatient Therapy?
title_full 1006. Do Antibiotic Choices Made in the ED Influence Inpatient Therapy?
title_fullStr 1006. Do Antibiotic Choices Made in the ED Influence Inpatient Therapy?
title_full_unstemmed 1006. Do Antibiotic Choices Made in the ED Influence Inpatient Therapy?
title_short 1006. Do Antibiotic Choices Made in the ED Influence Inpatient Therapy?
title_sort 1006. do antibiotic choices made in the ed influence inpatient therapy?
topic Abstracts
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6811290/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofz360.870
work_keys_str_mv AT jonestravism 1006doantibioticchoicesmadeintheedinfluenceinpatienttherapy
AT doddsashleyelizabeth 1006doantibioticchoicesmadeintheedinfluenceinpatienttherapy
AT johnsonmelissad 1006doantibioticchoicesmadeintheedinfluenceinpatienttherapy
AT moehringrebekahw 1006doantibioticchoicesmadeintheedinfluenceinpatienttherapy
AT sarubbichristina 1006doantibioticchoicesmadeintheedinfluenceinpatienttherapy
AT wrennrebekah 1006doantibioticchoicesmadeintheedinfluenceinpatienttherapy