Cargando…

1073. Analysis of the Antimicrobial Stewardship Program Recommendation Process in the Intensive Care Units at a Large Tertiary Community Hospital

BACKGROUND: Studies suggest up to 60% of antibiotics prescribed in the intensive care units (ICUs) may not be optimized. The antimicrobial stewardship team (AST) at Abbott Northwestern consists of infectious diseases trained pharmacists, pharmacy residents, and/or advanced pharmacy practice experien...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Song, Youchan, Holt, Jessica, Gens, Krista
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6811297/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofz360.937
_version_ 1783462448664150016
author Song, Youchan
Holt, Jessica
Gens, Krista
author_facet Song, Youchan
Holt, Jessica
Gens, Krista
author_sort Song, Youchan
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Studies suggest up to 60% of antibiotics prescribed in the intensive care units (ICUs) may not be optimized. The antimicrobial stewardship team (AST) at Abbott Northwestern consists of infectious diseases trained pharmacists, pharmacy residents, and/or advanced pharmacy practice experience (APPE) pharmacy students and provides prospective audits and feedback on all inpatients not being seen by infectious diseases specialists and currently receiving any anti-infectives. Comprehensive daily profile reviews are performed and recommendations are communicated via a physician sticky note in the electronic medical record (EMR) and/or via a direct page. Beginning January 2018, the AST started reviewing patients in the two ICU units earlier to ensure recommendations were completed prior to multidisciplinary rounds. The AST also initiated sending a message within the EMR alerting the decentral pharmacists prior to rounds. METHODS: A retrospective chart review was conducted on recommendations made by the AST between February and April 2017 (control group) and February and April 2018 (intervention group) for patients on two ICU units (ICU 1 and ICU 2). Time to acceptance and acceptance rates were calculated for the control and intervention period. A one-tailed t-test was performed for the time to acceptance analysis and a Chi-squared test was performed to compare acceptance rates. Results were deemed statistically significant when P < 0.05. RESULTS: Time to acceptance for the recommendations showed a significant decrease from 25.9 to 13.7 hours with the new process in ICU 1 (P = 0.038). Provider acceptance rate increased significantly from 77.8% to 88.4% in ICU 2 (P = 0.037). CONCLUSION: Changing the workflow of the prospective audit and feedback process by the AST had a meaningful impact by decreasing the response time (time to acceptance) and increasing acceptance rates of the recommendations in the ICUs. The revised process improved communication between the AST, decentral pharmacist, and attending provider, which in turn may have contributed to the positive outcomes. DISCLOSURES: All authors: No reported disclosures.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6811297
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-68112972019-10-29 1073. Analysis of the Antimicrobial Stewardship Program Recommendation Process in the Intensive Care Units at a Large Tertiary Community Hospital Song, Youchan Holt, Jessica Gens, Krista Open Forum Infect Dis Abstracts BACKGROUND: Studies suggest up to 60% of antibiotics prescribed in the intensive care units (ICUs) may not be optimized. The antimicrobial stewardship team (AST) at Abbott Northwestern consists of infectious diseases trained pharmacists, pharmacy residents, and/or advanced pharmacy practice experience (APPE) pharmacy students and provides prospective audits and feedback on all inpatients not being seen by infectious diseases specialists and currently receiving any anti-infectives. Comprehensive daily profile reviews are performed and recommendations are communicated via a physician sticky note in the electronic medical record (EMR) and/or via a direct page. Beginning January 2018, the AST started reviewing patients in the two ICU units earlier to ensure recommendations were completed prior to multidisciplinary rounds. The AST also initiated sending a message within the EMR alerting the decentral pharmacists prior to rounds. METHODS: A retrospective chart review was conducted on recommendations made by the AST between February and April 2017 (control group) and February and April 2018 (intervention group) for patients on two ICU units (ICU 1 and ICU 2). Time to acceptance and acceptance rates were calculated for the control and intervention period. A one-tailed t-test was performed for the time to acceptance analysis and a Chi-squared test was performed to compare acceptance rates. Results were deemed statistically significant when P < 0.05. RESULTS: Time to acceptance for the recommendations showed a significant decrease from 25.9 to 13.7 hours with the new process in ICU 1 (P = 0.038). Provider acceptance rate increased significantly from 77.8% to 88.4% in ICU 2 (P = 0.037). CONCLUSION: Changing the workflow of the prospective audit and feedback process by the AST had a meaningful impact by decreasing the response time (time to acceptance) and increasing acceptance rates of the recommendations in the ICUs. The revised process improved communication between the AST, decentral pharmacist, and attending provider, which in turn may have contributed to the positive outcomes. DISCLOSURES: All authors: No reported disclosures. Oxford University Press 2019-10-23 /pmc/articles/PMC6811297/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofz360.937 Text en © The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial reproduction and distribution of the work, in any medium, provided the original work is not altered or transformed in any way, and that the work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Abstracts
Song, Youchan
Holt, Jessica
Gens, Krista
1073. Analysis of the Antimicrobial Stewardship Program Recommendation Process in the Intensive Care Units at a Large Tertiary Community Hospital
title 1073. Analysis of the Antimicrobial Stewardship Program Recommendation Process in the Intensive Care Units at a Large Tertiary Community Hospital
title_full 1073. Analysis of the Antimicrobial Stewardship Program Recommendation Process in the Intensive Care Units at a Large Tertiary Community Hospital
title_fullStr 1073. Analysis of the Antimicrobial Stewardship Program Recommendation Process in the Intensive Care Units at a Large Tertiary Community Hospital
title_full_unstemmed 1073. Analysis of the Antimicrobial Stewardship Program Recommendation Process in the Intensive Care Units at a Large Tertiary Community Hospital
title_short 1073. Analysis of the Antimicrobial Stewardship Program Recommendation Process in the Intensive Care Units at a Large Tertiary Community Hospital
title_sort 1073. analysis of the antimicrobial stewardship program recommendation process in the intensive care units at a large tertiary community hospital
topic Abstracts
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6811297/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofz360.937
work_keys_str_mv AT songyouchan 1073analysisoftheantimicrobialstewardshipprogramrecommendationprocessintheintensivecareunitsatalargetertiarycommunityhospital
AT holtjessica 1073analysisoftheantimicrobialstewardshipprogramrecommendationprocessintheintensivecareunitsatalargetertiarycommunityhospital
AT genskrista 1073analysisoftheantimicrobialstewardshipprogramrecommendationprocessintheintensivecareunitsatalargetertiarycommunityhospital